Ignition/Tuner/ECM/Fuel Injection Need advice on ignition issues? Questions about a tuner? Have questions about a EFI calibration or Fuel Injection? Tips on Engine Diagnostics, how to get codes, and what they mean. Find your answers here.

Set AFR or raise VE for Power Vision with Target Tune??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-16-2018, 03:02 AM
uwiik's Avatar
uwiik
uwiik is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Jakarta - Indonesia
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default Set AFR or raise VE for Power Vision with Target Tune??

Logged some minor knock retard events on some area of my map according to MegalogviewerHD. I prefer to add a bit more fuel on the problem area and re test before resorting to timing reduction of the knocking area.

The question is, when using Target Tune should I add some VE to the area where I want to add fuel or just simply change the target AFR/lambda on the knocking area?

I understand that adding VE is the way to go for basic narrow band version of AT when you want to add more fuel to certain area VS Target Tune which is working in different way by using VE just for basic calculation accuracy (less correction by WB sensors if the VE are spot on) with the actual AFR/Lambda fully rellying on WB sensors feedback (full closed loop) therefore adding VE on Target Tune strategy will not add any actual fuel.

So with Target Tune I will need to just change the target AFR/Lambda instead of adding VE to the knocking areas?

Am I assuming correct?
 

Last edited by uwiik; 06-16-2018 at 03:11 AM.
  #2  
Old 06-16-2018, 04:25 AM
Kingglide549's Avatar
Kingglide549
Kingglide549 is offline
Banned
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Viet Vet, crossroads
Posts: 4,576
Received 969 Likes on 694 Posts
Default

Volumetric efficiency?
Is not the size of the lung the size of the lung? (and that metric that fills it? )
Unless I am out in the park here to change the VE is not like adding a gadget, or I would be right out there in the shop right now!
If you are running lean then you have to fatten it up.
 
  #3  
Old 06-16-2018, 05:04 AM
uwiik's Avatar
uwiik
uwiik is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Jakarta - Indonesia
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kingglide549
Volumetric efficiency?
Is not the size of the lung the size of the lung? (and that metric that fills it? )
Unless I am out in the park here to change the VE is not like adding a gadget, or I would be right out there in the shop right now!
If you are running lean then you have to fatten it up.
I don't quite understand what you mean? So should I add VE or just add more fuel on target AFR table with Target Tune WB strategy? I am not running lean, most of the detected knock are around 2250-3500 rpm @ 30-90 kpa and the actual AFR (WBO2 logged) on the cells where knocks being logged are around 13.5-12.5 AFR, the knock are very minor between 0.25 to 1 with mostly just a few hit counts hence the reason I just wanna first try to add a bit more fuel instead of pulling timing.
 
  #4  
Old 06-16-2018, 07:06 AM
uwiik's Avatar
uwiik
uwiik is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Jakarta - Indonesia
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Below tables are where the knocks happened in correlation of spark retard F&R, actual AFR F&R, and timing F&R



Spark Knock R


Actual Timing When Knocking Detected R


Actual AFR When Knocking Detected R


Spark Knock F


Actual Timing When Knock Detected F


Actual AFR When Knocking Detected F
 
  #5  
Old 06-16-2018, 08:56 AM
hrdtail78's Avatar
hrdtail78
hrdtail78 is offline
Road Warrior

Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Alorton, Illinois
Posts: 1,897
Received 565 Likes on 393 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by uwiik

I understand that adding VE is the way to go for basic narrow band version of AT when you want to add more fuel to certain area VS Target Tune which is working in different way by using VE just for basic calculation accuracy (less correction by WB sensors if the VE are spot on) with the actual AFR/Lambda fully rellying on WB sensors feedback (full closed loop) therefore adding VE on Target Tune strategy will not add any actual fuel.

So with Target Tune I will need to just change the target AFR/Lambda instead of adding VE to the knocking areas?

Am I assuming correct?
Target tune works the exacted way as narrow band sensors. Dyno jet or Fuel Moto did not change anything in the calibration no matter what has been said. They are both going to center trims around the target AFR. So, if you want to add fuel. It needs to be done with target. Adding in VE is fighting the ECM if that area of the VE table is going to be ran in closed loop.

Let's keep this simple. If you want to run an area richer. You target a richer AFR in that area.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by hrdtail78:
GROOVY1975 (02-13-2024), Ronbo1 (11-14-2019)
  #6  
Old 06-16-2018, 10:59 AM
uwiik's Avatar
uwiik
uwiik is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Jakarta - Indonesia
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hrdtail78
Target tune works the exacted way as narrow band sensors. Dyno jet or Fuel Moto did not change anything in the calibration no matter what has been said. They are both going to center trims around the target AFR. So, if you want to add fuel. It needs to be done with target. Adding in VE is fighting the ECM if that area of the VE table is going to be ran in closed loop.

Let's keep this simple. If you want to run an area richer. You target a richer AFR in that area.
Right on point 👍 thanks for the insight
 
  #7  
Old 06-17-2018, 07:53 AM
mrlexus's Avatar
mrlexus
mrlexus is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 159 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

If you just added to the VE table, and didn't change the corresponding a/f ratio table, when you auto tune, (or when riding with target tune) it will try to correct to the a/f ratio that is set in the table. You could always disable the closed loop in winpv, and see what it does on the log by just raising the VE table.

My experience on MY bike with target tune is that it always seems to be on the rich side of the target ratio. When I tuned the WOT, I had to disable closed loop and manually set the VE tables to get a flat line.

I would also comment that with it just pulling that small amount (less than one degree) of timing, environment, weather, wind, hills, can be the difference in it pulling or not pulling timing between rides. I'd probably just pull half what your logs show and retest. There is just no way it's possible to notice a degree or two of timing when riding at part throttle.

 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rodzilla71
Ignition/Tuner/ECM/Fuel Injection
7
06-22-2018 01:14 PM
uwiik
Ignition/Tuner/ECM/Fuel Injection
7
06-16-2018 10:23 PM
ILLADELPHFATBOY
2014-2023 Touring Models
1
05-24-2015 07:45 AM
FinalShot
Touring Models
11
03-24-2014 06:41 AM
uwiik
Ignition/Tuner/ECM/Fuel Injection
3
10-21-2013 08:10 AM



Quick Reply: Set AFR or raise VE for Power Vision with Target Tune??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 PM.