Milwaukee Eight (M8) 2017 and up M8 Air and Liquid Cooled discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stage 1 gains. Bang for the buck isn't what it used to be.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 01-26-2017, 02:25 PM
lyork's Avatar
lyork
lyork is offline
Stellar HDF Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: The Great Midwest
Posts: 2,108
Received 450 Likes on 318 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by goose222
Is there a chance some of these Dyno sheets could be scuwed a bit. Not calling anybody a liar but I had a dealer show me a dyno run on a bone stock m8 and it showed 129 torque.
Just something to think about. The chart above makes no sense for a stage I.
I've asked the same thing. The chart above was one of two that a local dealer did Stage 1's on, both had almost identical numbers. They had shown a Dyno sheet on a Stage 1 flash (no Dyno tune) that had about 1/2 the power and torque gain
 
  #12  
Old 01-26-2017, 02:36 PM
martin10's Avatar
martin10
martin10 is offline
Road Warrior
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: VA
Posts: 1,547
Received 504 Likes on 327 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Airborne06
I feel the same way. I used to immediately change to slip ons, tuner, air cleaner...the usual routine, as soon as I got the bike. This is the first time I haven't had a desire to do so. The OEM pipes sound pretty good, and my bike runs great as is! If I ever decide to change to slip ons, it will be just for looks. Don't think I would even do an air cleaner change or tuner even if I did put on Street Cannons.
Heck, I have two sets of Street Cannons in my garage now (one black, one chrome) from my last Ultra Limited that I can't use on the 17.
It seems that the mufflers and the air box both work better than they did on the earlier models.
 
  #13  
Old 01-26-2017, 03:52 PM
MysticPurple's Avatar
MysticPurple
MysticPurple is offline
Advanced
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Maine
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Agree that the dyno chart doesn't make sense compared to Fuel Moto charts I've seen.
Agree the M8 has better stock breather and pipes the any other OEM HD Ive owned
Agree I think i'll leave it stock too.

The HD OEM pipes sound decent just not loud but nice tone for what they have (have noticed they do get a little more volume with time)
if any upgrade it will be Street Cannon's (no tune or breather upgrade required) just for a tiny bit more exhaust note without being gnarly or obnoxious.
i like listening to tunes. I also don't want it to run harder and take away how smooth it runs.

Every HD I've owned ran smoothest when it was stock. Add performance upgrades and it improves power, acceleration, etc with a sacrifice of comfort due to it running rougher too.

For those that want the best bang for the buck I think stage 2 with a cam that has a broad band TQ increase is the way to go. displacement increase and much more cost do not interest me at all. Of course I would bet that even the stage 2 will slightly degrade the smoothness of the M8.
 

Last edited by MysticPurple; 01-26-2017 at 03:57 PM.
  #14  
Old 01-26-2017, 03:55 PM
Prot's Avatar
Prot
Prot is online now
Club Member

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 21,758
Received 14,165 Likes on 6,216 Posts
Default

The Evo's were so choked down from the factory and made small numbers that it took very little effort and money to nearly double the horsepower and torque.

The twin cams were so lean from the factory to meet EPA regulations that simply adding more fuel and slightly more aggressive ignition timing produced some good gains but not as much of a difference as with the Evo because they were already more efficient, mostly because of better heads.

The M8 achieved EPA compliance through efficiency and as a result, less power was left on the table. Sure, more is to be had but since you are already at a very good starting point, there is less that was left on the table with existing components. An argument could be made that since the various M8 screaming eagle kits are EPA compliant, the bikes could have left the factory with those components installed and instead were held back for the purpose of an added revenue stream, especially since many riders are happy enough with the bike as it is now. The $1,595 kit that takes a 107" standard M8 to 114" to me is probably the sweet spot right now with regard to bang for the buck. Despite matching the displacement of the CVO's, it actually produces slightly more torque than the CVO, probably due to higher compression.

http://mstore.harley-davidson.com/st...107ci-to-114ci

Another thing is everything from food to the new bikes costs a lot more today than it did thirty years ago. In the late 80's $15,000 bought you a loaded to the max touring bike. Sportster were only $4,999 brand new. Those same models are just about double the price now.

Funny enough, Jeeps in the late 80's were $12,000 to $15,000. Today most Wranglers are in the upper thirties to lower forties new, and the used ones that sold for $12,000 when new are commonly going for twenty thousand on up.

Remember the ninety nine cent whopper at Burger King? Now a trip through the drive through can easily set you back $8 per person by the time you pay for the so called value meal.
 

Last edited by Prot; 01-26-2017 at 03:58 PM.
  #15  
Old 01-26-2017, 04:12 PM
mjwebb's Avatar
mjwebb
mjwebb is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: State of Confusion
Posts: 11,867
Received 8,528 Likes on 4,425 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MysticPurple
Agree that the dyno chart doesn't make sense compared to Fuel Moto charts I've seen.
Agree the M8 has better stock breather and pipes the any other OEM HD Ive owned
Agree I think i'll leave it stock too.

The HD OEM pipes sound decent just not loud but nice tone for what they have (have noticed they do get a little more volume with time)
if any upgrade it will be Street Cannon's (no tune or breather upgrade required) just for a tiny bit more exhaust note without being gnarly or obnoxious.
i like listening to tunes. I also don't want it to run harder and take away how smooth it runs.

Every HD I've owned ran smoothest when it was stock. Add performance upgrades and it improves power, acceleration, etc with a sacrifice of comfort due to it running rougher too.

For those that want the best bang for the buck I think stage 2 with a cam that has a broad band TQ increase is the way to go. displacement increase and much more cost do not interest me at all. Of course I would bet that even the stage 2 will slightly degrade the smoothness of the M8.
"if any upgrade it will be Street Cannon's (no tune or breather upgrade required)" actually for the first time ever HD states ECM recalibration required with Street Tuner for just Street Canons, which I did but left the stock intake alone..runs just as smooth as it did stock with an increase in redline rpm's..so for under $1000 got a nice looking, sounding and performing upgrade and don't have the need or desire to go any further
 
  #16  
Old 01-26-2017, 04:36 PM
YammyDrummer's Avatar
YammyDrummer
YammyDrummer is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,298
Received 487 Likes on 288 Posts
Default

A lot of great points made in this thread. Sorta reinforces my absolute lack of conviction and constant flip-flopping on doing any performance upgrades to the Road King.
 
  #17  
Old 01-26-2017, 04:44 PM
hikervt's Avatar
hikervt
hikervt is offline
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Hometown
Posts: 277
Received 48 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bradn
Question. Since a stage 1 only consists of a tuner, breather and slip-on's, which 3rd party component would make the most difference, the tuner?
I don't think it's as simple as "one" 3rd party component being your key item. If your going to be buying new components and want the best bang for your buck, I'd call Fuel Moto and get a head pipe, slip-ons, air cleaner and a tuner.

You will hear all kinds of rambling on here, but flat out you won't get a better full package deal, especially one that offers the kind of support they do.
 
  #18  
Old 01-26-2017, 04:49 PM
Prot's Avatar
Prot
Prot is online now
Club Member

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 21,758
Received 14,165 Likes on 6,216 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by YammyDrummer
A lot of great points made in this thread. Sorta reinforces my absolute lack of conviction and constant flip-flopping on doing any performance upgrades to the Road King.
My suggestion is run stock for now except for replacing that ugly *** air cleaner. In a few years when you start getting bored with the bike, do a refresh to include performance improvements using what then be more mature aftermarket components. The bang for the buck will be better by then and you won't be in a continuous state of rebuild like some are now.

At least one guy on this forum is on his third performance build of his 2017 M8. Yeah, one bike, torn down three times with completely different components that don't build on each other, and he is not a manufacturer or performance shop or anything. Just a guy with money to burn that takes his bike apart and puts it back together instead of riding.
 
  #19  
Old 01-26-2017, 04:50 PM
lp's Avatar
lp
lp is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 11,286
Received 2,720 Likes on 1,546 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mjwebb
actually for the first time ever HD states ECM recalibration required with Street Tuner for just Street Canons, which I did but left the stock intake alone..
I don't think I've ever seen any HD literature stating that X performance exhaust does not require ECM calibration. HD has always stated that any changes in either intake or exhaust required ECM calibration. If it wasn't specifically stated, it has always been implied (remember those famous "Downloads"). Any who, for exhaust, even on an M8, it's been proven many, many times that the bike will actually run fine without a tuner, but they will run better and be in full HD/EPA compliance if you add THEIR tuner. Which is fine. 17 changed things a little so, well you know...

If you already have 1000 bucks into a tuner and pipes it's different that you wouldn't put an intake on it. They are only a few bucks more and you get a wee bit of upper performance and better filter media; however, I get it. Your bike, your deal. Not judging. But hell I would.
 
  #20  
Old 01-26-2017, 07:57 PM
smitty901's Avatar
smitty901
smitty901 is offline
Seasoned HDF Member

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 22,203
Received 9,603 Likes on 5,172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Airborne06
I feel the same way. I used to immediately change to slip ons, tuner, air cleaner...the usual routine, as soon as I got the bike. This is the first time I haven't had a desire to do so. The OEM pipes sound pretty good, and my bike runs great as is! If I ever decide to change to slip ons, it will be just for looks. Don't think I would even do an air cleaner change or tuner even if I did put on Street Cannons.
Heck, I have two sets of Street Cannons in my garage now (one black, one chrome) from my last Ultra Limited that I can't use on the 17.
I cleared out some parts, gave away two sets of stock post 2013 headers. 2 full Stock 103 AC's. A set of 12 inch and set of 13 inch air shocks. Brand new stock tail light. The stuff just piles up and never gets used .
Traded for the M8 and have left it alone except for some LED,s. The 2016 hi out put 103 was a turning point for me. I did the header to get rid of the CAT with a Fuel moto 2-1-2 ceramic coated worked great. Changed nothing else . I did add some LED's and my BAL tail light.
I know reading the net you would not thinks so but they run pretty darn good now.
 


Quick Reply: Stage 1 gains. Bang for the buck isn't what it used to be.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 AM.