Stage 1 gains. Bang for the buck isn't what it used to be.
#21
This is exactly how I feel right now. The bike runs great, feels great, sounds good, and really doesn't "need" any performance upgrades. Especially when considering the minimal returns on investment. I would like a smidge more volume out of the exhaust, but even that seems like waste of money at times.
#22
I don't think I've ever seen any HD literature stating that X performance exhaust does not require ECM calibration. HD has always stated that any changes in either intake or exhaust required ECM calibration.
If you already have 1000 bucks into a tuner and pipes it's different that you wouldn't put an intake on it. They are only a few bucks more and you get a wee bit of upper performance and better filter media; however, I get it. Your bike, your deal. Not judging. But hell I would.
If you already have 1000 bucks into a tuner and pipes it's different that you wouldn't put an intake on it. They are only a few bucks more and you get a wee bit of upper performance and better filter media; however, I get it. Your bike, your deal. Not judging. But hell I would.
as far as the intake, I've explained my position on this several times in other posts, nothing to do with the extra few $, and the calibration with the stock intake still shifts the upper rpm range a bit higher...not a K&N fan and it's all they offer..I've always opted for the synthetic media air cleaners on my past performance upgrades..but the stock intake on the M8 provides enough air for slip-ons and Stage 1 ECM recalibration..and flat out offers better protection and filtration and is quieter..things that are more important to me at this 'Stage' in my riding life
Last edited by mjwebb; 01-26-2017 at 11:01 PM.
#23
I feel the same way. I used to immediately change to slip ons, tuner, air cleaner...the usual routine, as soon as I got the bike. This is the first time I haven't had a desire to do so. The OEM pipes sound pretty good, and my bike runs great as is! If I ever decide to change to slip ons, it will be just for looks. Don't think I would even do an air cleaner change or tuner even if I did put on Street Cannons.
Heck, I have two sets of Street Cannons in my garage now (one black, one chrome) from my last Ultra Limited that I can't use on the 17.
Heck, I have two sets of Street Cannons in my garage now (one black, one chrome) from my last Ultra Limited that I can't use on the 17.
#24
no, Harley has always stated in the 'Features' tab whether or not ECM is required on their performance parts. This is the first time ever it states 'YES' for just their slip-ons
as far as the intake, I've explained my position on this several times in other posts, nothing to do with the extra few $, and the calibration with the stock intake still shifts the upper rpm range a bit higher...not a K&N fan and it's all they offer..I've always opted for the synthetic media air cleaners on my past performance upgrades..but the stock intake on the M8 provides enough air for slip-ons and Stage 1 ECM recalibration..and flat out offers better protection and filtration and is quieter..things that are more important to me at this 'Stage' in my riding life
as far as the intake, I've explained my position on this several times in other posts, nothing to do with the extra few $, and the calibration with the stock intake still shifts the upper rpm range a bit higher...not a K&N fan and it's all they offer..I've always opted for the synthetic media air cleaners on my past performance upgrades..but the stock intake on the M8 provides enough air for slip-ons and Stage 1 ECM recalibration..and flat out offers better protection and filtration and is quieter..things that are more important to me at this 'Stage' in my riding life
As far as stock filter media. Sorry, I don't read all your posts. I too use stock because it's good enough. Keep an eye on that filter though as it will eventually swell and don't clean it with any chemicals or it will swell immediately blocking flow. Roger on the K&N and intake noise. I gave those up awhile back as well. If you don't spend a ton of time above 4K there is really no need.
#25
As far as stock filter media. Sorry, I don't read all your posts. I too use stock because it's good enough. Keep an eye on that filter though as it will eventually swell and don't clean it with any chemicals or it will swell immediately blocking flow. Roger on the K&N and intake noise. I gave those up awhile back as well. If you don't spend a ton of time above 4K there is really no need.
oh man, you've missed out on some epic farble garble! LOL
"Keep an eye on that filter though as it will eventually swell and don't clean it with any chemicals or it will swell immediately blocking flow. If you don't spend a ton of time above 4K there is really no need."
have half dozen or so air filters on hand for both mine and my wife's M8. plan on changing them out regularly, at least every oil change or based on circumstances and only clean with mild dish washing detergent..at $20 a pop I'm not concerned with having to toss em' after a few cleaning cycles if I have to. I do spend a fair amount of time between 4-5K rpm's and it hauls **** up there no prob! if you think about it, Harley engineers didn't design, develop and test the intake to just barely provide enough air flow for a clean filter only...basically stock engines don't need more than what they provided us with
#26
I do spend a fair amount of time between 4-5K rpm's and it hauls **** up there no prob! if you think about it, Harley engineers didn't design, develop and test the intake to just barely provide enough air flow for a clean filter only...basically stock engines don't need more than what they provided us with
Bottom line, I don't think HD designed the stock filter as a performance filter, it's not bad though, and I think if you really like the feel of those higher RPMs you would be a great candidate for having a truly high flow intake system of some sort to complement what you've already modded. You'd probably feel the difference and actually use it. I think the M8 is much more capable than what the stock system allows. Because you know HD... they aren't going to put everything on the table first time. They either leave performance out due to restrictions (noise, AFR, EPA) or because they simply want you to buy stuff. I dunno, just an opinion. The topic of what HD engineers do an why could fill pages. They do things for a reason and we hope they are giving us exactly what we need in good faith, but maybe, maybe the stock system could use more. Kinda like the reasoning you like that oil cooler fan. I personally don't think its needed because HD engineers didn't put it on the stock bike. However some think it's a must include item and HD should have made it stock. Who knows. Maybe HD does.
#27
I hear ya' and totally get it. (I've had many Harleys and they all had the SE intakes) and I've had this discussion with our dealership service techs, the same guys that were part of a national championship crew for Harley's top fuel drag bike...just think there's a general consensus, perception out there that this stock intake is woefully inadequate so thousands of folks spend hundreds of $ to buy a SE intake that is what is used for even their Stage 4 performance kits..one could reasonably surmise that same intake is way overkill for just adding slip-ons and recalibration..comes down to what's good enough is good enough I guess..the ever so slight gain isn't enough to offset the extra annoying noise and poorer protection for me...agree the fan assist isn't necessary for perhaps the majority of applications..but cooler oil temps running conventional oil for me seems wise with the heads heating up that oil now..millions of us Harley owners doing all kinds of different things..heck I may very well be completely wrong on all my OCD logic here
Last edited by mjwebb; 01-27-2017 at 07:48 AM.
#28
Certainly there is no reason NOT to use synthetics in this engine...considering the heat over the head.
All it takes is 1 time overheating Dino oil and you are running crap oil until you change it again.
That said, synthetic will also fail (at higher temps) but IMO, the additional heat protection insurance is worth the diff in costs.
Bob
All it takes is 1 time overheating Dino oil and you are running crap oil until you change it again.
That said, synthetic will also fail (at higher temps) but IMO, the additional heat protection insurance is worth the diff in costs.
Bob
#29
Certainly there is no reason NOT to use synthetics in this engine...considering the heat over the head.
All it takes is 1 time overheating Dino oil and you are running crap oil until you change it again.
That said, synthetic will also fail (at higher temps) but IMO, the additional heat protection insurance is worth the diff in costs.
Bob
All it takes is 1 time overheating Dino oil and you are running crap oil until you change it again.
That said, synthetic will also fail (at higher temps) but IMO, the additional heat protection insurance is worth the diff in costs.
Bob
#30