Would you buy a V-4 Harley?
#1
Would you buy a V-4 Harley?
Or a V-6 or anything other than a V-twin. The recent threads bashing the 2018 M8 as "Harleysakis" that "sound like Hondas" got me thinking. What will HD do when they reach the end of their ability to make a V-twin smoother, quieter and more powerful? They're pretty much stuck with the V-twin platform because we Harley riders demand it, unlike metric riders who will accept pretty much any platform the Japanese companies offer as long as it's cool. The more innovative the better.
For my part, I have not opinion on the new platform or the M8 motor. I just bought a brand new 2017 Heritage not because I hate the new bikes (I don't) but because I loved my old 103 TC so much I wanted to buy a brand new one with a warranty before they were all gone.
So, back to my original question? If HD decided they had to move away from the V-twin (a liquid cooled V-4 for example) in order to satisfy the desire for more smoothness and power would you buy one?
For my part, I have not opinion on the new platform or the M8 motor. I just bought a brand new 2017 Heritage not because I hate the new bikes (I don't) but because I loved my old 103 TC so much I wanted to buy a brand new one with a warranty before they were all gone.
So, back to my original question? If HD decided they had to move away from the V-twin (a liquid cooled V-4 for example) in order to satisfy the desire for more smoothness and power would you buy one?
Last edited by ChickinOnaChain; 09-01-2017 at 08:36 AM.
Top Answer
09-01-2017, 12:43 PM
The irony is Harley learned the wrong lesson.
Yes, the V-Rod didn't sell well. But the reason it didn't sell wasn't the engine, as the engine was good. It was the rest of the bike was poorly designed.
If Harley would have put that engine in a decent bike I would have jumped on it.
Yes, the V-Rod didn't sell well. But the reason it didn't sell wasn't the engine, as the engine was good. It was the rest of the bike was poorly designed.
If Harley would have put that engine in a decent bike I would have jumped on it.
#2
#3
#4
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 21,758
Received 14,165 Likes
on
6,216 Posts
#8
Yep, as long as the bike looked good and the value was there for the price tag. I didn't buy a Harley because it's a "Harley" I bought it because I wanted a touring bike that I liked the look of and I enjoyed riding. If the Limited was a bike made by Indian and the Harley had the look of the Indian. I wouldn't still by the Harley. I'd buy the bike I liked... The Indian in that case. I'm not loyal to a brand, I'm going to give my cash to the company I like the product of. Same with auto and any other thing...
#9
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Along the shoreline in SE CT, and SW FL
Posts: 11,174
Received 4,145 Likes
on
1,508 Posts
I remember reading up on that, and pictures of it in some chassis that looked like it was based off of an FXRT.
I think a lot of Harleys market appeal is for those that love "old school big cubes"..and all that goes with it (mostly the sound). Kinda like muscle cars of the late 60's. Old school, lumpy sound at idle, simple to work on.
Granted..that type of market is dwindling as us old guys are getting older and dropping out.
But I tell ya, if those any of those Nova projects did make it to production back in the late 70's...and I found one for sale...and it was carb'd....I'd get it!
I think a lot of Harleys market appeal is for those that love "old school big cubes"..and all that goes with it (mostly the sound). Kinda like muscle cars of the late 60's. Old school, lumpy sound at idle, simple to work on.
Granted..that type of market is dwindling as us old guys are getting older and dropping out.
But I tell ya, if those any of those Nova projects did make it to production back in the late 70's...and I found one for sale...and it was carb'd....I'd get it!