02-07-2018, 10:26 AM

I've seen your posts and to be honest i'm not exactly sure of a good way to respond and yet still keep the spirit of this thread positive. FM has participated on HDF and other social media sites for over a decade, it's not that hard to draw conclusions when you read into certain types of statements or behavior.

We have posted multiple data set's for this cam on different bikes & displacements, and also included this cam in our cam test which was fully documented. I really feel it's ironic that you are asking for more data from FM when the conclusion you are drawing is based on your own conjecture; rather than your own bike, testing, or experience. Their lies the problem, because you don't have any of these components there is little I can do to help you (or your opinion). I cant review at your dyno charts, look at your tune & log files, cant have you check the compression to make sure the cam is installed properly, etc.. I cant offer any path to resolution.

You've also asked me to post the raw dyno run files from our cam testing, noting it will "set this to rest once and for all", while I am not going to post raw files from our dyno publicly (I have never seen anyone in our industry do this; ever), if reviewing the raw data is that important to you I can set up a time and we can discuss it by phone and if you are at a PC I can start a Teamviewer session and log you in remotely. We can go over the runfiles together and you can graph them however you like. I'm not however sure what you are looking for as these are the exact files the runs posted were derived from; the conditions, correction factor, and multipler are right on the charts. Again; with your fake dyno run comment I can only assume your intentions.

In the end I truly hope you find the cam you are looking for, whether you refer to the data we post or otherwise. If I can be of additional assistance all channels are open.