When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Stage II vs Stage III Big Bore for slow/parking lot rideability
I'm posting this question here instead of the Tech & Mechanical forum because my focus is on rideability....I'm looking at options through Fuel Moto for either a Stage II Camshaft, etc. upgrade vs. going with a M8 124" BIg Bore Stage III, to go on my 2017 Street Glide Special (107" M8). I've been unable to locate much info on how the Big Bore kit affects rideability at parking lot speeds, other than hearing that a Stage IV big bore produced a bike that chugged below 2500 RPM and made it a real chore at slow speeds.
Has anyone here done the 124" Stage III, and can you comment on how that affected rideability, particularly in the parking lot or stop-and-go traffic?
Any general feedback on your experience w Stage II vs Stage III (and any regrets) also appreciated!
Last edited by Jscifers; Jun 7, 2026 at 11:26 AM.
Reason: additional info
If I’m wrong, please enlighten me, but doesn’t controlling your bike at parking lot speeds and in stop-and-go traffic have more to do with throttle control, rear brake control and clutch friction zone control? What’s having or nor having a big bore or lumpy cam have to do with it?
Last edited by GalvTexGuy; Jun 7, 2026 at 02:25 PM.
If Im wrong, please enlighten me, but doesnt controlling your bike at parking lot speeds and in stop-and-go traffic have more to do with throttle control, rear brake control and clutch friction zone control? Whats having or nor having a big bore or lumpy cam have to do with it?
You are 100% correct sir! You can do it on a Honda grom or a Suzuki Hayabusa for all it matters, lol.
Thanks, and I understand your point about the fundamentals. Thing is, without having ridden (or seen videos of) a bagger with something like a 124" motor doing low-speed maneuvers, I can only go off of what I have heard, and info on that is pretty sparse. What I picture causing potential issues is having to keep unusually high revs in the friction zone (e.g. the bike mentioned above, which I saw at a local HD dealer and was told is prone to dying if revs aren't kept above 2500 RPM when starting from a stop) or the bike being super-sensitive to throttle inputs with monster torque on tap (again, that can be mitigated my modulating power going to the wheel using the friction zone while doing a something like a tight U-turn, but it seems like the sensitivity could leave little room for error).
Thanks, and I understand your point about the fundamentals. Thing is, without having ridden (or seen videos of) a bagger with something like a 124" motor doing low-speed maneuvers, I can only go off of what I have heard, and info on that is pretty sparse. What I picture causing potential issues is having to keep unusually high revs in the friction zone (e.g. the bike mentioned above, which I saw at a local HD dealer and was told is prone to dying if revs aren't kept above 2500 RPM when starting from a stop) or the bike being super-sensitive to throttle inputs with monster torque on tap (again, that can be mitigated my modulating power going to the wheel using the friction zone while doing a something like a tight U-turn, but it seems like the sensitivity could leave little room for error).
Sounds like bs to me. I rode a 135 CVO RGL for 4 years, it was no difference in how you handled parking lot maneuvers vs my 114 road king.
I don't know what you're after in a jug size and cam combo, but I agree with what's been said. It really doesn't matter whether you have a horsepower monster Hyabusa or your current bike with torque monster cams. Proper technique wins in the slow speed maneuvers.
Thanks, and I understand your point about the fundamentals. Thing is, without having ridden (or seen videos of) a bagger with something like a 124" motor doing low-speed maneuvers, I can only go off of what I have heard, and info on that is pretty sparse. What I picture causing potential issues is having to keep unusually high revs in the friction zone (e.g. the bike mentioned above, which I saw at a local HD dealer and was told is prone to dying if revs aren't kept above 2500 RPM when starting from a stop) or the bike being super-sensitive to throttle inputs with monster torque on tap (again, that can be mitigated my modulating power going to the wheel using the friction zone while doing a something like a tight U-turn, but it seems like the sensitivity could leave little room for error).
I've got a 2017 RGS (OEM 107 M8) that I had built to FM 124 Stage IV back in 2018.
The build has been very reliable for over 40K miles.
I would do it all over again except my next bike was a 135 CVO RG ST.
135 FT/LB torque @ 2500 RPM is not what I would consider "chugging out!"
It would be an interesting conversation for that local HD dealer to tell me it's prone to dying if revs aren't kept above 2500 RPM!
Providing of course it has been properly tuned!
Very rideable and also very fun to ride!
Last edited by Beartooth Rider; Jun 7, 2026 at 07:09 PM.
From a 107 stage 2 SE Torque cam to a 119 stage 3 with the Star Racing 30 30 cam setup. 132 torque 120 horse power. No different on slow speed handling, just lots more shake at idle. Torque hits quickly at 2000 rpms. Plenty of tractor pull power.
Harley-Davidson Fat Boy Becomes a Dark, Decepticon-Inspired Custom
Slideshow: Killer Custom's latest build relies on styling changes rather than performance upgrades, giving the cruiser an entirely different personality.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.