When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Interesting thread. I just chopped the rear and front (aftermarket front). Im going to go raise the rear fender at it mounting point thus closing the gap between the fender and wheel and giving it that true hard tail look.. I didnt realize how much wider it is then the tire creating a very noticable gap on the sides.. I will be going with LED lights mounted under the fender... Back to research...
I went with a 250 rear to help close up the gap with the stock fender.
I was making an observation of all the Rocker pics, and noticed that only a couple have eliminated the gap completely, by lowering and or seat change. Regardless of what route we choose the bike remains the stand up and shout bike of the Harley stable. So as far as the rear end of the bikes, I like speedsnice and Alains the best. The heartlands are nice, but it really just swaps the location of the gap, and creates a huge gap between the rear tire and fender. Especially those that cut the fender short. I favor what Harley created more than heartland. Just a observation, and to each their own.
My observation on the Rocker rear gap is that there are pro's and con's (side effects) to each approach in solving the problem. There are things I like and dislike about every approach that has been taken (heartland kit, lowing, different seat, etc.) to fix it but with every approach I like it better than the stock look.
I think the coolest thing about a Rocker is that it can take on many different looks and it not just a cookie cutter looking bike no matter what you do to it. I don't know how many times I've had people come up to me and ask, "what brand of Harley is that" and I tell them it's a Rocker and they either say, "that's what I thought but wasn't sure" or they say, "really that's a Rocker, very cool". And these are people that own Harley's and hang out at biker places, not soccer mom's .
Last edited by rubiconMike; May 26, 2009 at 12:40 PM.
My observation on the Rocker rear gap is that there are pro's and con's (side effects) to each approach in solving the problem. There are things I like and dislike about every approach that has been taken (heartland kit, lowing, different seat, etc.) to fix it but with every approach I like it better than the stock look.
I think the coolest thing about a Rocker is that it can take on many different looks and it not just a cookie cutter looking bike no matter what you do to it. I don't know how many times I've had people come up to me and ask, "what brand of Harley is that" and I tell them it's a Rocker and they either say, "that's what I thought but wasn't sure" or they say, "really that's a Rocker, very cool". And these are people that own Harley's and hang out at biker places, not soccer mom's .
Hmmm, so you think the gap is a problem? I'm sure others think the same. I wasn't crazy about it myself, so I lowered it reducing the gap to my liking. I agree with much you said as far as it taking on different looks. I'm not sure what your referring to when you say stock look. As not lowered and no seat change? To me as long as you leave the rear fender mounted to the swing arm, regardless if you cut the fender, lower it, change the seat or do all three, it still has the stock look. As I've mentioned before Hankster76, tom hummer, hotroc54,Rail, and the rest that went with the heartland, hats off to them all. They look killer. One day I might get tired of the stock look and do the same to mine. Its nice to know we have options. The rake and the rear end with the swing arm mounted fender is what attracted me to the Rocker. If the rear end was a problem to me, at the time I was looking at a new bike, I would have purchased a night train and put a 240 kit on it. To each his own. Take your bike for example Mike, to me it still has the look of a Rocker, however its definitely not stock, and looks great.
Last edited by rockerheadsteve; May 26, 2009 at 01:26 PM.
I'm not sure what your referring to when you say stock look. As not lowered and no seat change? To me as long as you leave the rear fender mounted to the swing arm, regardless if you cut the fender, lower it, change the seat or do all three, it still has the stock look.
Well the tread is in reference to the Rocker Gap so I was referring to the "stock look" in regards to the gap. And my point is that the heartland kit, lowing, different seat, etc. all address the gap.
Well the tread is in reference to the Rocker Gap so I was referring to the "stock look" in regards to the gap. And my point is that the heartland kit, lowing, different seat, etc. all address the gap.
Your right, the gap is a problem, and I think we've all addressed it quite well. However when reduced a little I have no problem with it. If you want it totally eliminated, I think what you've done with the bobber look and what others have done with the heartland is a great fix.
Last edited by rockerheadsteve; May 26, 2009 at 01:43 PM.
Thank's Tom!!..Your Rocker is one azmazing machine also!,as is the stock Rocker to the most customized Rocker on this Forum. like everyone who bought a Rocker or Rocker C I saw the potential in it and wanted to be diffrent!. I absolutly love the wicked ideas yall come up with for your bikes. everytime I log on I can't wait to see what someone has done next!!
I am grateful for all your ideas and attempts at addressing the gap. I think the spring seat and bobbed fender looks awesome on Mike's bike, while keeping the gap. I hope to change from the Rocker seat to a spring seat eventually. However, the Heartland Kit that several members have used give it a real muscle bike edge. The FCW is a great bike to own because with a few bolt-on mods you can look old school or modern muscle bike.
7 Surprising Harley-Davidson Products that Are Not Motorcycles
Slideshow: The bar-and-shield logo shows up on far more than motorcycles, some of the company's most unexpected products have nothing to do with riding.
Slideshow: From the troubled AMF years to modern misfires, these bikes earned reputations for reliability issues, questionable engineering, or disappointing performance.
Crazy Bunderbike Build Looks Amazing, But Is It Impossible to Ride?
Slideshow: The Swiss custom shop has taken a Harley Softail and stretched it into something so long and low that it looks closer to a rolling sculpture than a conventional motorcycle.
Engraved Rebellion: Inside Bundnerbike's Glam Rock II
Slideshow: A standard cruiser becomes an intricate metal canvas in the hands of a Swiss custom house known for pushing Harley-Davidson platforms far beyond their factory brief.
Slideshow: Harley-Davidson's challenges aren't abstract; they show up in dropping shipments, shrinking dealer traffic, and strategic decisions that aren't yet translating into growth.