Chain vs belt
#22
John
The following users liked this post:
Madnss (07-20-2018)
#23
Not because of power, but because the way I ride I can't afford to have a belt **** out on me in the middle of nowhere (before anyone says otherwise, I've seen and had it happen). It turns a long weekend in to a disaster because you hit a stone on that gravel road 4 miles back....try finding a dealer that stocks a belt. Not gonna happen unless the stars align.
#24
232,000 miles on my 2006 Sporty and I have had one belt break at 68,000 miles due to damage and excessive force on it when I went from neutral to first due to my Spring Plate going bad and my not realizing it.
When I am on a trip I take a spare belt with me just in case. The one I take is a used one as it is easier to put on than a brand new one.
I have no desire to have a chain, but if you want one go for it.
When I am on a trip I take a spare belt with me just in case. The one I take is a used one as it is easier to put on than a brand new one.
I have no desire to have a chain, but if you want one go for it.
The following users liked this post:
08xl1200r (07-20-2018)
#25
For a 1250 rubber ripping wheelie machine perhaps I can see the benefit(s) of a chain.
For off-road mounts with more suspension travel. a chain is better than a belt as belt drives work with limited rear suspension travel set-ups.
Two of my current motorcycles have chains, obviously the DR650, which is used off road and gets/stays dirty as well as my 1250S Bandit. In the case of the latter, modern chains are not as messy and maintenance intensive as those from a by-gone era but, admittedly, it's not as care free as the belt drives we have all come to know and love.
For my two Suzukis, I prefer a chain; for the Harleys, a belt drive is nice. If I ever decide to make a Scrambler bike out of my 883 Iron, I would switch to a chain - for the added rear suspension travel it would allow.
That's my two-cents ... for whatever it's worth.
For off-road mounts with more suspension travel. a chain is better than a belt as belt drives work with limited rear suspension travel set-ups.
Two of my current motorcycles have chains, obviously the DR650, which is used off road and gets/stays dirty as well as my 1250S Bandit. In the case of the latter, modern chains are not as messy and maintenance intensive as those from a by-gone era but, admittedly, it's not as care free as the belt drives we have all come to know and love.
For my two Suzukis, I prefer a chain; for the Harleys, a belt drive is nice. If I ever decide to make a Scrambler bike out of my 883 Iron, I would switch to a chain - for the added rear suspension travel it would allow.
That's my two-cents ... for whatever it's worth.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post