MPG Open trailers VS enclosed V nose
#11
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SW FL-Jersey Shore Emigre
Posts: 5,454
Received 2,858 Likes
on
1,270 Posts
That's what I'm thinking....It's my understanding that U-Haul doesn't like to rent it's motorcycle trailers for overnight/long distance hauling. I've done a day rental, no problem. Any have any experience??
#12
I would love to have a enclosed trailer hands down. Problem is I live in a HOA and can't store a trailer outside. Only have a 2 1/2 garage and with a van, jeep and 2 bikes these no room for a enclosed trailer. A stand up or flat bed type trailer could work. I was thinking that the trade off would be gas savings. Thanks for all the replies.
Be Safe JIM
Be Safe JIM
#13
#14
#15
#16
i tow a tandem axle vnose (7*12) with a 5.7 tundra. My MPG is about 9 while towing. Without the trailer I avg 15. I dont think there is much difference Vnose or bull nose. You are pulling a box and that is a lot of wind resistance.
I do like my bike inside for protection.
I do like my bike inside for protection.
Simi-V-Nose The way it is now
Last edited by FastHarley; 11-02-2015 at 06:24 AM.
#17
I am looking to get a single bike trailer for times when I just can't ride due to Back problems, time or weather. I would think that a light flat single bike trailer would get better MPG then a box type trailer even with the v nose. I was at the trailer dealership and the salesman is telling me the the difference is very small due to the v nose. I think he's full of sh*t but would like to hear from others. I know the pros and cons for both, just want to know about gas MPG. Tow vehicle is a Toyota 6 cyl. van.
Thanks JIM
Thanks JIM
#18
#19
They say a flat nose with the nose cone is the most aerodynamic. How much a difference? Who knows. I'm starting to think the v nose is just a sales gimmick as far as aerodynamics are concerned. The other half is the rear drag thats also hurting fuel mileage. If one looks at semi-trailers, I've never seen a v nose box truck or semi-trailer. Some carriers are using sheet metal extensions that fold out to help reduce rear drag.
#20
The towing mileage will generally be better with a small open trailer than an enclosed trailer. A low roofed single axle V-nose will give very reasonable towing mileage. The biggest towing mileage drop comes when you increase roof height and add a second axle.
This is from personal experience. I've owned & used all of these configurations.
The best compromise for towing a single bike was a custom ordered 6x12 V-nose with 6' ceiling, single axle w/electric brakes. Got close to 20 mpg towing this setup with a midsize V6 pickup (truck got 29 mpg w/o trailer). Same truck towing open single axle w/o brakes got 22 mpg.
Current trailer is 7x14 V-nose with 6'6" ceiling dual axle w/electric brakes. Too big for the midsize truck. Pull it with a full size V8 pickup. Mileage in 10 mpg towing (truck w/o trailer gets 20 mpg). Dual axle adds rolling resistance. Higher roof adds wind resistance. Width should be non-factor since 7' is no wider than tow vehicle.
These examples are all from 20 plus years of MI to SD to MI trips, all run at posted speed limits on expressways.
This is from personal experience. I've owned & used all of these configurations.
The best compromise for towing a single bike was a custom ordered 6x12 V-nose with 6' ceiling, single axle w/electric brakes. Got close to 20 mpg towing this setup with a midsize V6 pickup (truck got 29 mpg w/o trailer). Same truck towing open single axle w/o brakes got 22 mpg.
Current trailer is 7x14 V-nose with 6'6" ceiling dual axle w/electric brakes. Too big for the midsize truck. Pull it with a full size V8 pickup. Mileage in 10 mpg towing (truck w/o trailer gets 20 mpg). Dual axle adds rolling resistance. Higher roof adds wind resistance. Width should be non-factor since 7' is no wider than tow vehicle.
These examples are all from 20 plus years of MI to SD to MI trips, all run at posted speed limits on expressways.