Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why get a stage two upgrade?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 05-23-2018, 12:44 AM
2AMGuy's Avatar
2AMGuy
2AMGuy is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 8,955
Received 2,489 Likes on 1,602 Posts
Default

All depends on what you're looking for.
I had a 2000 Ultra with the T/C 88 and a 5spd transmission.
I do a lot of highway riding and my wife's Softail had a 6spd trans and she liked to cruise at 80+MPH.
At 80MPH+, my engine was starting to hum at about 3500RPM's so I decided to have a 6spd trans installed and when I did, the engine didn't have the "steam" to push the weight of the bike as I would have liked it to, but it did run much easier at higher freeway speeds.

I then had the "95" Big Bore Kit installed and had the ECM "flashed".
I'm not sure of what numerical gains it provided, the mid-range torque made he bike feel hundreds of pounds lighter and I was quite happy with it.
On the down side, my MPG's dropped a bit (especially at speeds over 80MPH) so there is always a trade-off.

The other consideration is the cost of the upgrade and the fact that you will ever see any financial return (if any) when you decide to sell your bike.
 
  #12  
Old 05-23-2018, 01:20 AM
rhuff's Avatar
rhuff
rhuff is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 48.067222,12.863611
Posts: 3,903
Received 1,118 Likes on 732 Posts
Default

The stage 2 on the rushmore's isn't what it was like pre-rushmore. The rushmore cam, when properly tuned in stage 1 form (catless header, good muffler, TTS or PV) performs really well. Not a ton to be gained, even with good cams like the CR570-2, woods 222, Andrews 48, etc.

Everyone is different, but if I was going to go from stage 1 to anything, it would be mild headwork to go with a new cam. Just my 2 cents.

As to engine life.... a MILD build and a good tune will not shorten a twinkies lifespan MOST times.
 
  #13  
Old 05-23-2018, 04:20 AM
Hate Work's Avatar
Hate Work
Hate Work is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,718
Received 158 Likes on 138 Posts
Default

OP: What would you do with a little more response and torque? Twist the wick more? Ride a little faster? The harder you ride the more wear and tear you put on your bike. If money is no issue, ride like you stole it. If longevity is your desire, maybe be happy with what you have.
 
  #14  
Old 05-23-2018, 05:48 AM
steelpony16's Avatar
steelpony16
steelpony16 is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 902
Received 139 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

The question is, Why are you thinking about a stage 2 ?
 
  #15  
Old 05-23-2018, 07:19 AM
0ldhippie's Avatar
0ldhippie
0ldhippie is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 0
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rhuff
The stage 2 on the rushmore's isn't what it was like pre-rushmore. The rushmore cam, when properly tuned in stage 1 form (catless header, good muffler, TTS or PV) performs really well. Not a ton to be gained, even with good cams like the CR570-2, woods 222, Andrews 48, etc.

Everyone is different, but if I was going to go from stage 1 to anything, it would be mild headwork to go with a new cam. Just my 2 cents.

As to engine life.... a MILD build and a good tune will not shorten a twinkies lifespan MOST times.

excatly! A good exhaust and tune on the Rushmore’s will really wake them up. While ya can pick up some HP with a cam change. Without proper headwork it really isn't money well spent.
 
  #16  
Old 05-23-2018, 07:34 AM
Dguy's Avatar
Dguy
Dguy is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 578
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

duplicate
 

Last edited by Dguy; 05-23-2018 at 07:38 AM.
  #17  
Old 05-23-2018, 07:37 AM
Dguy's Avatar
Dguy
Dguy is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 578
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

I did cams in mine. Very happy. Riders that look at HP and Torque numbers before and after a cam change aren't seeing the whole picture and are usually the ones to say it isn't worth it for what you gain. It's about time spent in the torque curve that new cams will offer. It's about having the power to pass without stomping down a gear, it's about more responsive two-up riding and more enjoyable solo riding. It's my favorite upgrade on my bike so far. I noticed more of a change from Stage 1 to Stage 2 then I did from Stock to Stage 1. Mind you this is all on a pre-Rushmore 2012. The secret is in choosing a cam that suits your riding style and where you want the power made.
 
  #18  
Old 05-23-2018, 09:40 AM
scott7d's Avatar
scott7d
scott7d is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 542
Received 846 Likes on 257 Posts
Default

A stage II/Cam upgrade is a pretty economical way to gain more power/torque. There is a practical cam for every purpose. Some like to peg the rev limited every chance they get and look for horsepower, some just want better low/midrange torque for their heavy touring bike.

You have to ask yourself how far you want to go. Do you want something to bolt in with your current setup and compression, or do you plan on doing more work down the road?

The single most important thing you can do afterwards is get a comprehensive dyno tune. There are many important parameters outside of closed loop that need to be evaluated with a drastic change such as cams. Overall, some added torque does make it a more enjoyable ride. If done right and TUNED, your bike will be happy for many miles.
 
  #19  
Old 05-23-2018, 03:43 PM
leftyjm's Avatar
leftyjm
leftyjm is offline
Road Warrior

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,372
Received 395 Likes on 270 Posts
Default

I am plenty happy with my RUSHMORE 103 Stage 1. My PV tuner from Fuel Moto, my V&H VO 2 naked air breather and the Rush Big Louie’s really seemed to wake this puppy up. Not even considering a Stage 2
 
  #20  
Old 05-23-2018, 08:14 PM
DeneFXDWG's Avatar
DeneFXDWG
DeneFXDWG is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Posts: 1,506
Received 55 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

I was absolutely blown away with my Stage 1 Rushmore after I installed a map from Fuel Moto.
I bought a set of TW222 cams because I didn’t want to beat the girl up on a dyno like I did on my last bike even though I’d rather Cycle Rama’s offerings.
It ran alright, definitely seat of the pants more power EVERYWHERE.
So not buying into the auto tune thing myself doing any good I took it down to Paradise Harley in Tigard Oregon to give my bike to their tech to have him say he knows nothing about Powervision. I should’ve walked but short story, bike ran like crap. More power than FM canned map, but ran poor, (108/94).
Moral of the story is, I found cam change in my instance for my riding style was an enormous improvement.
except I’m out 4 hours labor and back to FM mapping but still elated about Wood cams.
 


Quick Reply: Why get a stage two upgrade?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:48 AM.