Is a Fuel Moto 107 kit worth cost over cams and lifters?
#21
#22
From FM email:
"You will need a bigger throttle body no matter what 107 you do. I will recommend the SE 50 mm Throttle Body since it is the most cost effective, it comes with appropriately sized fuel injectors."
I would assume the 110 would require it if the 107 does.
"You will need a bigger throttle body no matter what 107 you do. I will recommend the SE 50 mm Throttle Body since it is the most cost effective, it comes with appropriately sized fuel injectors."
I would assume the 110 would require it if the 107 does.
Last edited by jb1023; 07-11-2019 at 12:08 PM.
#24
Originally Posted by jb1023
From FM email:
"You will need a bigger throttle body no matter what 107 you do. I will recommend the SE 50 mm Throttle Body since it is the most cost effective, it comes with appropriately sized fuel injectors."
I would assume the 110 would require it if the 107 does.
"You will need a bigger throttle body no matter what 107 you do. I will recommend the SE 50 mm Throttle Body since it is the most cost effective, it comes with appropriately sized fuel injectors."
I would assume the 110 would require it if the 107 does.
There's a ton of dyno sheets on their site to support that fact. The gains from the larger TB on a 107 build are marginal at best.
Last edited by SBates08; 07-11-2019 at 12:37 PM.
#26
If you're doing a 10.5:1 on a 107 with 777 cams and Level B heads, the 50mm TB is not needed. Regardless of what your email says it just isn't so. If I were going with the 110(or bigger) then yes I would upgrade the TB as well.
There's a ton of dyno sheets on their site to support that fact. The gains from the larger TB on a 107 build are marginal at best.
There's a ton of dyno sheets on their site to support that fact. The gains from the larger TB on a 107 build are marginal at best.
Regardless of which direction I go, I have lots to research as I have no idea what the differences are between the various Woods cams, or any mfg for that matter.
#27
Originally Posted by jb1023
He recommended the 999-6A cams so maybe that is the difference?
Regardless of which direction I go, I have lots to research as I have no idea what the differences are between the various Woods cams, or any mfg for that matter.
Regardless of which direction I go, I have lots to research as I have no idea what the differences are between the various Woods cams, or any mfg for that matter.
Last edited by SBates08; 07-11-2019 at 01:37 PM.
The following users liked this post:
jb1023 (07-11-2019)
#28
#29
I was just on the Woods site and they do say for the 999-6 cam a 50mm TB is required. None of their other cams list this requirement. I'm not sure this is the right cam for what I am looking for though. I think the 555 or 777 with their broader band range would be better for me. The 999-6 sounds like it is more for top end performance as it does not really kick in till 3k rpm.
Where is the line for needing a clutch?
Where is the line for needing a clutch?
#30