Sportster to Touring?
#1
#2
The following users liked this post:
Trudger1272 (08-05-2017)
#3
Had a XL1200C and was going to get a King (actually rented the King over a weekend and then tried an RG) a couple years ago. The King has a lower center of gravity and seems better at lower speed maneuvering. Weight difference was not an issue and you'll get use to it after a few rides.
I didn't get the King at the time as I had a screaming deal on a Softail Deluxe. Got it free for my birthday
Interested in a King again, and will reciprocate the surprise to my GF and get her and SGS on her BD when I get my King.
I didn't get the King at the time as I had a screaming deal on a Softail Deluxe. Got it free for my birthday
Interested in a King again, and will reciprocate the surprise to my GF and get her and SGS on her BD when I get my King.
The following users liked this post:
Trudger1272 (08-05-2017)
#4
I've got both! Actually went to a Sporty after many years of big twins and still ride them both. The contrast is quite significant, as one seems big and relatively heavy when you first get on it, but if you then swap back to the Sporty that seems small and skinny! Be aware that many of us who bought stripped down Touring bikes, like the RK, soon realise they really want much of the extra 'stuff', like batwing and tourpak! So keep an open mind, but otherwise don't hesitate to do it.
The following 2 users liked this post by grbrown:
nobodyknowsme (08-05-2017),
Trudger1272 (08-05-2017)
#5
I went from a 2011 883 Sporty to a Heritage and finally to a Road King. Best move I could have made IMHO. The Sportster was a great first Harley, but not the most comfortable for even moderate ride length. I ended up with a RK as I decided I wanted to tour, but honestly even for a day ride its really is great.....GL whatever you do.
The following users liked this post:
Trudger1272 (08-05-2017)
#6
The following users liked this post:
Trudger1272 (08-05-2017)
Trending Topics
#8
I've got both! Actually went to a Sporty after many years of big twins and still ride them both. The contrast is quite significant, as one seems big and relatively heavy when you first get on it, but if you then swap back to the Sporty that seems small and skinny! Be aware that many of us who bought stripped down Touring bikes, like the RK, soon realise they really want much of the extra 'stuff', like batwing and tourpak! So keep an open mind, but otherwise don't hesitate to do it.
I do admit I like the looks of RGs but, I feel safer being able to see the road just in front of me. "I've experienced some nasty potholes here!"
#9
The following users liked this post:
Trudger1272 (08-06-2017)
#10
Ive also recently gone from a 95 sporty to a 2000 Ultra. Night and day difference in handling, especially for a big boy like me. The sporty was twitchier, and carried its weight up high, and didnt work well for 2up. The touring is pretty much a polar opposite, and instills confidence that it isnt going to do anything unexpected with either grooved pavement, wind blast, or just gettin squirrely.
The following users liked this post:
Trudger1272 (08-06-2017)