Dyna Glide Models Super Glide, Super Glide Sport, Super Glide Custom, Dyna Glide Convertible, Super Glide T-Sport, Dyna Glide Police, Dyna Switchback, Low Rider, Street Bob, Fat Bob and Wide Glide.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Which set up?
Standard Lowrider, modified preformance ( 110 not worth it)
10
22.73%
S version, modified looks (110 worth it)
31
70.45%
other (post below)
3
6.82%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll

2016 Lowrider vs S version buying advise

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 07-26-2016, 09:45 PM
CaptainAwesome's Avatar
CaptainAwesome
CaptainAwesome is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: on the move
Posts: 862
Received 216 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

I usually not a huge purple guy but man that color works beautifully on that bike!

My only consideration for the S model is the engine. The suspension and brakes I don't mind upgrading. The seat either way I'll opt for something better 2 up, ect.

I also need to test ride a Fat Bob. Love the way the look in pictures. Wasn't sure on the forward controls on the show room (just used to having my feet under me), but I need to give it a shot. Also might allow for some used options.

I keep hearing of a before and after on when the Dyna's had a frame change and they got better. Anyone know what year that was?
 
  #12  
Old 07-27-2016, 12:07 PM
NORTY FLATZ's Avatar
NORTY FLATZ
NORTY FLATZ is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Sandy Eggo's North County
Posts: 14,592
Received 5,388 Likes on 2,952 Posts
Default

Both have mags
Both have ABS
Both have Security
Both have dual front rotors
Only 1 has TBW. Some prefer cables as the TBW may become problematic with use.
Both are fun.
1 is cheaper than the other.
Is 1 hotter than the other?
Are they both equally reliable?
Both weigh entirely too much.
 
The following users liked this post:
CaptainAwesome (07-28-2016)
  #13  
Old 07-27-2016, 08:45 PM
horsepower's Avatar
horsepower
horsepower is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 127
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The motor was the deal breaker for me. Had to have that 110 cu.
 
The following users liked this post:
CaptainAwesome (07-28-2016)
  #14  
Old 07-28-2016, 01:27 PM
relykz's Avatar
relykz
relykz is offline
Intermediate
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 44
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I recently upgraded from a 2015 Street Bob with a Stage-1 to a 2016 Low Rider S. The S is faster bone stock than the Street Bob with the Stage 1. Got my Road Rage 2-into-1 exhaust on now, loaded the PowerVision tuner with FuelMoto's baseline and started auto-tuning a couple days ago. After 4 or 5 auto-tune sessions, I can tell you that the FXDLS is a good bit faster than the 103ci with Stage 1. I used the same stretch of road as a baseline for testing... hope to have some actual dyno numbers in the near future.
 

Last edited by relykz; 07-28-2016 at 01:30 PM. Reason: Typo
The following users liked this post:
CaptainAwesome (07-28-2016)
  #15  
Old 07-28-2016, 01:37 PM
jcanrun's Avatar
jcanrun
jcanrun is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Elk Grove, California
Posts: 336
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NORTY FLATZ
Both have mags
Both have ABS
Both have Security
Both have dual front rotors
Only 1 has TBW. Some prefer cables as the TBW may become problematic with use.
Both are fun.
1 is cheaper than the other.
Is 1 hotter than the other?
Are they both equally reliable?
Both weigh entirely too much.
======================

However, abs and security are optional on the standard low rider and cost $795 and $395 so $14399 vivid black plus $1190 = $15,589 so you are getting closer to the S at $16,699 price which also includes other features such as upgraded forks and shocks and cruise control plus the 110 motor. Either way, both are great bikes and whichever one floats your boat is the one you should get.
 
The following users liked this post:
CaptainAwesome (07-28-2016)
  #16  
Old 07-28-2016, 07:46 PM
CaptainAwesome's Avatar
CaptainAwesome
CaptainAwesome is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: on the move
Posts: 862
Received 216 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

I'm a bit of a power hound, I imagine if I go with a new one I'm going to have to get the S model. I think I'd just regret not getting the bigger engine in the long run if I bought a new bike.

Still considering finding a used one, maybe a Fat Bob. I plan on testing one out this weekend.

But in the end I'll probably end up with the S...
 
  #17  
Old 07-28-2016, 07:47 PM
CaptainAwesome's Avatar
CaptainAwesome
CaptainAwesome is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: on the move
Posts: 862
Received 216 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by relykz
I recently upgraded from a 2015 Street Bob with a Stage-1 to a 2016 Low Rider S. The S is faster bone stock than the Street Bob with the Stage 1. Got my Road Rage 2-into-1 exhaust on now, loaded the PowerVision tuner with FuelMoto's baseline and started auto-tuning a couple days ago. After 4 or 5 auto-tune sessions, I can tell you that the FXDLS is a good bit faster than the 103ci with Stage 1. I used the same stretch of road as a baseline for testing... hope to have some actual dyno numbers in the near future.
This is pretty much exactly what I needed to know. Thank you.
 
  #18  
Old 07-28-2016, 09:05 PM
Relbus's Avatar
Relbus
Relbus is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 196
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SquishyLowRider
There have been reports from test rides that the engine in the LR-S stock isn't any faster than a modded LR. This is all butt dyno of course. With that said, not many riders keep a Harley engine stock so a modded 107 will be better power wise. I have also heard the 107 runs hotter stock.
110
 
The following users liked this post:
CaptainAwesome (07-29-2016)
  #19  
Old 07-28-2016, 10:20 PM
Crispy Nubbins's Avatar
Crispy Nubbins
Crispy Nubbins is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The LRS is worth the money. I love mine & it's still stock except for seat. I put a 2 up Sundowner on it for the wife. It's real comfy to me. Buddy at Harley dealership just put a 2 Brothers 2-1 exhaust on his S & dyno tuned with the Screaming Eagle Race tuner & put 95hp & 115tq down. Not to shabby for pipes & tune. Cruise control is worth the money alone. I love cruise control. And keyless ignition is sweet. ABS is nice also. For the price you get a lot of goodies &'it hauls but.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by Crispy Nubbins:
CaptainAwesome (07-29-2016), relykz (07-29-2016)
  #20  
Old 07-29-2016, 04:22 AM
SlowriderInOz's Avatar
SlowriderInOz
SlowriderInOz is offline
Novice
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Canberra, Aus
Posts: 21
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

These were my thoughts when I was making this decision.
What I need - good handling, cruise, ABS, something different, Stage 1
LRS has - good handling, good brakes, cruise, abs, is different and 1/2 stage 1
LR has - abs, good brakes (all HDs come standard with abs in Aus and all Lowriders come with twin front brakes)
I can buy stage 1 and good handling but you cant upgrade the LR to cruise and being different. For the $2,500 difference getting the LRS made total sense.
Oh and while the difference between 103 and 110 wasn't a consideration when buying after riding the 110 and comparing to stock 103s that the dealership gives me as loaners, the 110 is so much better.
 

Last edited by SlowriderInOz; 07-29-2016 at 04:26 AM.
The following users liked this post:
CaptainAwesome (07-29-2016)


Quick Reply: 2016 Lowrider vs S version buying advise



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 AM.