Andrews 54H vs 67H
#1
Andrews 54H vs 67H
Im planning to go for a 103 build, Im using the following parts:
1- Ported original heads & cylinders.
2- Wiseco 10.5:1 forged pistons.
3- Cometic 0.30 gasket.
4- SE Super Tuner.
5- SE Air cleaner.
6- V&H Big Shots Staggered Black.
7- Andrews cam.
The corrected compression for 67H cam is 9.6:1
& for 54H is 9.9:1 (using Big Boyz calculator)
Which cam should I go for? I ride solo mostly, & I have no problem getting high octane fuel.
1- Ported original heads & cylinders.
2- Wiseco 10.5:1 forged pistons.
3- Cometic 0.30 gasket.
4- SE Super Tuner.
5- SE Air cleaner.
6- V&H Big Shots Staggered Black.
7- Andrews cam.
The corrected compression for 67H cam is 9.6:1
& for 54H is 9.9:1 (using Big Boyz calculator)
Which cam should I go for? I ride solo mostly, & I have no problem getting high octane fuel.
#4
#5
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#9
The 9.6 referenced above is static; corrected would only be about 8.5 and that is why I said the 67 woud be flat on the bottom. The 54 would be better but not by much.
I don't think 10.2 corrected is feasible with the 67; with either cam for that matter. Chamber volume would have to be small or dome pistons used and, in either case, cranking compression is well above 200psi. Are you building this one yourself or do you have a builder?
I don't think 10.2 corrected is feasible with the 67; with either cam for that matter. Chamber volume would have to be small or dome pistons used and, in either case, cranking compression is well above 200psi. Are you building this one yourself or do you have a builder?
#10
The 9.6 referenced above is static; corrected would only be about 8.5 and that is why I said the 67 woud be flat on the bottom. The 54 would be better but not by much.
I don't think 10.2 corrected is feasible with the 67; with either cam for that matter. Chamber volume would have to be small or dome pistons used and, in either case, cranking compression is well above 200psi. Are you building this one yourself or do you have a builder?
I don't think 10.2 corrected is feasible with the 67; with either cam for that matter. Chamber volume would have to be small or dome pistons used and, in either case, cranking compression is well above 200psi. Are you building this one yourself or do you have a builder?