Triple Tree?
#1
#2
Might be a risk without engineering math.
The 41mm could have been built to cost.
In other words, just enough material to limit failure.
There is a lot of force on the triple trees.
Less risk, find 43mm replacements.
Your call, yet I for one would be hesitant as failure would be horrible.
The 41mm could have been built to cost.
In other words, just enough material to limit failure.
There is a lot of force on the triple trees.
Less risk, find 43mm replacements.
Your call, yet I for one would be hesitant as failure would be horrible.
#3
Might be a risk without engineering math.
The 41mm could have been built to cost.
In other words, just enough material to limit failure.
There is a lot of force on the triple trees.
Less risk, find 43mm replacements.
Your call, yet I for one would be hesitant as failure would be horrible.
The 41mm could have been built to cost.
In other words, just enough material to limit failure.
There is a lot of force on the triple trees.
Less risk, find 43mm replacements.
Your call, yet I for one would be hesitant as failure would be horrible.
Kind of my assumption as well. Wasn't sure if people went this route or not though.
#5
Agree, however I'm trying to be mindful of still being able to use the nacelle for the FLD. I have no idea if going to bigger triple trees will still allow this.
#6
#7
Tired
If I was not so tired I would show you what is necessary to put a FatBob set of trees into a FLD nacelle. Unless you have mad skills on fabricating and can make a new skin you are looking at a huge project. To get 43mm fork tubes with a conventional fork to work with your FLD would require a large amount of expenditure. I can do Ohlins conventional 43mm forks but someone must make the triple tres to fit. I cut the nacelle to hell because I am not going to deal with the forks to be that poor handling.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post