Dry or wet air filter
#1
Dry or wet air filter
gonna do a stage one on the Ultra I bought last summer. I want to use the filter HD makes, it does not require it to be oiled. Appears to be a K&N from the photos. Aside from the fact an oiled filter would pick up more dust/dirt particles, is there anything else I'm missing here? I've got a Rhino, it requires the filter to be oiled, but we're talking about two totally different riding environments. I really hate screwing around with the oil mess.
#2
#3
I think we're talking different filters. I'm replacing the OEM with this (S/E, p/n 29773-02C). There's a number of different Stage 1 filters, some require oiling, this particular one does not. The question, is there a substantial difference in using an oiled filter vs dry. My guess is the difference is minor. But that's just a guess. If the difference is as small as expected I'd prefer to eliminate the mess of oiling.
#4
#5
+ one on that, oil is in spray form and light mist is sufficient not dripping, NO MESS REQUIRED!!!!
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
#10
There are vehicles of all sorts that have covered humungous mileages on stock dry filters. I doubt if any factory air filter these days is wet, certainly on bikes. It really is a case of use which ever type floats your boat. I can confirm that oiling a 'dry' one does restrict performance! My first new Harley was the first and still the only bike I have owned that came with a wet filter as stock. The main benefit of wet ones is that they can be reused, although I doubt if they are significantly better.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post