Cams
#1
#2
#4
#5
ya I really have my eyes on the woods 222 a lot of people say it had amazing low end but then some people say you have to shift really fast with it and that's what I'm torn about
#6
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Socialist Republic of the USA
Posts: 11,232
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
13 Posts
Here are a couple sites that may help.
Or further confuse you...
http://www.nightrider.com/biketech/selectcam.htm
http://www.nrhsperformance.com/tech_camshafts.shtml
Or further confuse you...
http://www.nightrider.com/biketech/selectcam.htm
http://www.nrhsperformance.com/tech_camshafts.shtml
#7
Trending Topics
#8
I think I might just do the 222's then I want the awesome low end they offer. How did they perform in 1st 2nd 3rd and 4th? That's where I want the power. Obviously first gear is short right
#9
#10
IMHO 222/48s are better 96 cams than 103 cams. The 103's higher compression is better suited to 555/54/57s. 570 is a nice cam but really needs more compression and headwork to shine. I'm a big fan of 57s in a stage 1 103 without headwork but I really don't understand all the "low end" worries? Who rides around under 2500??? There is also that shifter operated with your left foot!!
Last edited by 0ldhippie; 01-23-2015 at 07:05 PM.