Go Back   Harley Davidson Forums > Harley Davidson Motorcycles > Touring Models
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by: Fuel Moto USA

Welcome to HDForums.com!

Reply
 
 
 
P
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-29-2009, 10:10 AM
TODDNVAL TODDNVAL is offline
Senior Rider
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 382
Default SE 255 cams vs SE 204 cams??

Hi all, I have my 103 with the 255 cams and I do love where the power is at but like most I always want more. My riding is 2 up 95% of the time and I ride between 2000-3000 rpms 95% of the time so I want the TQ down low like the 255 cams have. I researched cams for ever and based on my riding style I went with the 255's. I had narrowed down to the 255 or the SE 204, and I still look at the 204 wondering if they might have been the better choice. The 204 from what little I know about cams looks like it would come close to the 255 down low but would offer more from 27-2800 on up through around 5500 for the occasional wild hair I get, am I right?? I forgot to mention that I did have a mild port and polish done on the stock heads, and I'm now running a Rinhart 2 into 1 pipe.
__________________
2009 Black Ultra Classic
SE 103 flat top pistons
Wood TW6-6 w/+4 gear
Ported/polished heads
SE super tuner
Vance/Hines power duals header w/ Monster Ovals
93.1HP/103.8TQ
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-29-2010, 07:58 PM
RangeRat's Avatar
RangeRat RangeRat is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 2,542
Default

BTT... I have the same question as OP so bumping the thread. Anyone???
__________________
USN '65 - '74
Bring'em home or send us back!
.

2013 Road Glide Custom, Candy Orange
CVMA 20-1
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-30-2011, 04:13 PM
thatjusthappened's Avatar
thatjusthappened thatjusthappened is offline
Hang Around
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 13
Default

i just built a 103 in a 2011 road glide and decided to go with the 204 for the same reason as TODDNVAL the "occasional wild hair". turns out it was the right choice for me. it pulled like a beast on the bottom end then once HD got their hands on it and tuned it , it didn't pull as hard due to them have to meet their epa requirement on air/fuel ratio. it dyno'd 90/106 and it will be going to a private shop in the near future for another tune and I believe the numbers will go up more.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-30-2011, 05:02 PM
DTTJGlide's Avatar
DTTJGlide DTTJGlide is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Cental Iowa
Posts: 1,742
Default

Do a search & read the test "Fuel Moto TW555 vs SE255". A P&P on the heads is pretty much wasted with the 255s since they run out of steam by the time the heads are starting to work, P&P shows the most gain at higher RPMs. The 555s are similar to the SE204s but have higher lift that will bolt in to the 07s & later, the 555s seem to be an outstanding cam for the late models.

Last edited by DTTJGlide; 01-30-2011 at 05:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-30-2011, 05:11 PM
blusmbl's Avatar
blusmbl blusmbl is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Detroit, the asshole of America
Posts: 1,268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thatjusthappened View Post
i just built a 103 in a 2011 road glide and decided to go with the 204 for the same reason as TODDNVAL the "occasional wild hair". turns out it was the right choice for me. it pulled like a beast on the bottom end then once HD got their hands on it and tuned it , it didn't pull as hard due to them have to meet their epa requirement on air/fuel ratio. it dyno'd 90/106 and it will be going to a private shop in the near future for another tune and I believe the numbers will go up more.
There is no EPA requirement for air/fuel ratio.
__________________
-Nick
'07 CRF450X, 2011 black RKC- V&H fishtails/S&S teardrop ac/TTS/14" wild1's
www.caintmakit.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-01-2011, 01:54 AM
oct1949's Avatar
oct1949 oct1949 is offline
Club Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ind, N of Purgatory
Posts: 46,965
Default

son had two bikes with the 204, both softails and there really made for lighter bikes....

The 255's will have more TQ in the 2-3k rpm range where the 204's will just be coming on at the 3+ range unless U do the 4* advance gear... then it'll be around 2700, but still the 204's start falling off around 4500 and drop quick to the 5200..

So if Ur want the 2-3k TQ the 255 are still pretty good,,
If Ur wanting more in the 2500-4500 then the 204's will rock...
__________________
07Heritage -47K
26 cams,
Bunch of bling and leather.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-01-2011, 10:18 AM
mongomark's Avatar
mongomark mongomark is offline
Senior Rider
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 499
Default

Most of my "cruising" is at 2700 rpms, right when the 204's start to kick in. Even when I'm cruising slower than that in 6th, by the time my grip is rotated back, I'm at 2700 or above. I agree with DTTJGlide though, with the higher lift, the 555 cam would rock in this application.
__________________
2007 FLHX, SE Heavy Breather A/C, RB Racing Pro Street Spyder header, SE 204 cams, Works 13" Steel Tracker ARC rear shocks, Race Tech Front Suspension with gold emulators (no drop, stock height), Bagger Brace frame link, Power Commander V Retro with Autotune. Just the beginning, more to come
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-01-2011, 10:48 AM
1931jamesw's Avatar
1931jamesw 1931jamesw is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,684
Default

With your riding style and two up, I don't think you'll like the 204's as well. Maybe look at some other cams besides HD's. The Andrews 48 should be a good one or look at tman's. I only have 96 cubes but I run the 255's also and on my dyno sheet I hit peak TQ at 3225 rpms at 104 ft/lbs. For whatever reason my 255's peak a little later than most others I see on this forum.
__________________

Hawg Wired, Gauges by Marty, Big Sucker AC, Big Boyz Heads, Throttle Body Ported In House, TMan Cams, Drago's Bike Works Dragula, TTS MasterTune
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-01-2011, 11:06 AM
fireaxxe's Avatar
fireaxxe fireaxxe is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Charlotte, N.C.
Posts: 967
Default

I have been wanting the 255's for the longest, but after long research I may be going with the 204's. I have a road king with a stock 96 inched standard compression motor, I am sitting about 75lbs lighter than the Ultra Classics and I dont think I need all that much low end torque. I want more mid range power. I also see a lot of valve train noise complaints and I just think the .550" valve lift may be too close to the limit for stock valve springs, so i want to stay around 1/2". Also I am wondering how much torque will i move from the lower rpms to the middle even tho 30 degrees of overlap is not much, the stock 9.2:1 compression ratio may have to be increased to get all the performance out of this cam.
__________________
If history repeats itself, then the future is doomed!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-01-2011, 11:54 AM
davewear's Avatar
davewear davewear is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fireaxxe View Post
I have been wanting the 255's for the longest, but after long research I may be going with the 204's. I have a road king with a stock 96 inched standard compression motor, I am sitting about 75lbs lighter than the Ultra Classics and I dont think I need all that much low end torque. I want more mid range power. I also see a lot of valve train noise complaints and I just think the .550" valve lift may be too close to the limit for stock valve springs, so i want to stay around 1/2". Also I am wondering how much torque will i move from the lower rpms to the middle even tho 30 degrees of overlap is not much, the stock 9.2:1 compression ratio may have to be increased to get all the performance out of this cam.
If you're not stuck on an HD cam consider the woods 5-6. I'm very happy with the increase they gave me accross the board with stock compression. The '07 and later heads will handle the .575 lift had a talk with Bob Wood to confirm.
Attached Thumbnails
SE 255 cams vs SE 204 cams??-jarz-sae-2011.jpg  
__________________
...seize the dave...

have a nice dave
'09 RG, monster ovals, pcv, SE ventilator, Fuelmoto headpipe, TW 5-6 cams, J&M 7.25 Rokkers & 250W Amp.
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2011, 11:54 AM
 
 
 
P
Reply

Tags
204, 255, 255cams, cams, eagle, reviews, sale, screamin, se, se204, se255, tw6, versus, vs, woods


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising
Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34 AM.

Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.5.2

Admin, Emails & Contact Details