Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

FM TW-222 Cam reviews needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 08-20-2012, 12:58 PM
fuelmoto's Avatar
fuelmoto
fuelmoto is offline
Platinum Sponsor
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Little Chute, WI
Posts: 7,219
Received 4,108 Likes on 1,340 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lionsm13
Actually, it is HD that is pro-active and voluntarily goes for the EPA bullshit, and spoon-feeds it to us.

They initiated the catalytic converter move, but thought/said to the EPA that all of the other motorcycle manufacturers had to follow suite.
This is according to an HD dealer.
The Japanese OEM's starting using catalyst exhaust systems already in the late 90's
 
__________________


Jamie Long / Fuel Moto USA
The USA's Leader V-Twin EFI & Performance www.fuelmotousa.com
Contact 920-423-3309
Email jamie@fuelmotousa.com










  #32  
Old 08-20-2012, 04:38 PM
07FLHT's Avatar
07FLHT
07FLHT is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sunny Southern California
Posts: 2,587
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I had the SE 255's, Rinehart TD's, SE A\C & PC-V w\AT (FM base map) in my 07 when it was a 96". I LOVED this combo! But I just had to shoot for that 100HP mark (103" Andrews 54's, Big Boyz heads) and found I liked the 96"\255 combo MUCH better! Tons of TQ from off idle to 4,500 rpm or so, right where I do most of my riding. I still have those 255's with only 3-3,500 miles on them but, if these 222's will give me that great low end TQ and about 10HP more than the average Stage 1, SE 255 combo, the 222's will be going in when the time comes!
 
  #33  
Old 08-20-2012, 06:22 PM
mgmmgm's Avatar
mgmmgm
mgmmgm is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spokane, WA.
Posts: 2,711
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default TW222 too

Yeah, would like to have the 222 cam as well.

Wonder if the B heads by FM would work with this cam, or not so much?
 
  #34  
Old 08-22-2012, 10:15 PM
equandt's Avatar
equandt
equandt is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,575
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mgmmgm
Yeah, would like to have the 222 cam as well.

Wonder if the B heads by FM would work with this cam, or not so much?
That would be interesting to know if the B heads can be set up to work with the TW-222 cam. I wouldn't be so much interest in increasing the overall peak HP but continuing to fatten up the torque curve would be of interest. The B heads usually help the torque curve as well, from what I can see.

FM may have to call this the "arm stretcher" combination because it looks like it may yank your arms off when you twist the throttle with all that torque down low.
 
  #35  
Old 08-23-2012, 12:33 AM
hattitude's Avatar
hattitude
hattitude is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 11,055
Received 7,412 Likes on 4,016 Posts
Default

Does anyone know how the TW-222 compares to the SE255 cam in a 103?

Sounds like they both make torque in lower RPM, but I don't know enough to look at the cam specs and know how close they might perform. Would it be worth switching out SE-255 for the TW-222?
 
  #36  
Old 08-23-2012, 01:19 AM
mtclassic's Avatar
mtclassic
mtclassic is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,437
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hattitude
Does anyone know how the TW-222 compares to the SE255 cam in a 103?

Sounds like they both make torque in lower RPM, but I don't know enough to look at the cam specs and know how close they might perform. Would it be worth switching out SE-255 for the TW-222?
i would say if you like to occasionally rev your bike past 3000rpm it would be worth it.
 
  #37  
Old 08-27-2012, 08:20 PM
7Sixpack7's Avatar
7Sixpack7
7Sixpack7 is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 309
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 7Sixpack7
Anyone know if the cams are compatible with the stock push rods or do you have to use adjustable push rods?
you need adjustable push rods per FM
 
  #38  
Old 09-15-2012, 10:20 PM
mgmmgm's Avatar
mgmmgm
mgmmgm is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spokane, WA.
Posts: 2,711
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

So are the TW 222 cams available yet?
 
  #39  
Old 09-15-2012, 10:28 PM
pat1's Avatar
pat1
pat1 is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: GA
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just installed the tw-222 in my 12 street glide last night, I haven't rode the bike yet but I'm going on a nice and long ride tomorrow. I can say this they have a sweet exhaust note @idle
 
  #40  
Old 09-15-2012, 10:33 PM
punisher660's Avatar
punisher660
punisher660 is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: UT
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes they are available, and I will soon answer my own thread. I ordered the TW-222 kit last week. It arrived Thursday, and I will have them installed by Wed.

I have never had my bike dynoed, so I can't tell you how much HP it has now or how much more it will have. Everything will be a seat of the pants evaluation. My current setup is the FM Jackpot Mufflers, FM 2-1-2 Headers, FM SE Intake, and Power Vision. I watch the power vision pretty closely when I ride and can tell you that the bike most of its power in the 4500 rpm range right now. My hope is that this cam puts the power much lower in the rpm range. I'll post a review next week.
 


Quick Reply: FM TW-222 Cam reviews needed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 AM.