Touring or not
#21
Once you go above the Road King you loose the ability to remove the windshield (if that's something you prefer).
The RK will give you better MPG's and will run freeway speeds just as well as any of the "touring" bikes but if you're looking for LOTS of storage, or a sound system, a true touring bike is what you're looking for.
The RK saddlebags provide enough storage for local riding but for trips you would need additional bag(s) or perhaps even a tour pack.
FWIW, don't rule out a Heritage until you have taken a test ride.
Detachable windshield and it looks cool and it's lower to the ground than a RK.
The leather bags are beautiful (I think) but they don't hold as much as the hard bags on a RK.
I personally thing the Heritage handles much better than the RK, but the RK rides like a touring model.
I've "toured" many miles on cruisers (Heritages/Road Kings) so it's a matter or what you want.
The RK will give you better MPG's and will run freeway speeds just as well as any of the "touring" bikes but if you're looking for LOTS of storage, or a sound system, a true touring bike is what you're looking for.
The RK saddlebags provide enough storage for local riding but for trips you would need additional bag(s) or perhaps even a tour pack.
FWIW, don't rule out a Heritage until you have taken a test ride.
Detachable windshield and it looks cool and it's lower to the ground than a RK.
The leather bags are beautiful (I think) but they don't hold as much as the hard bags on a RK.
I personally thing the Heritage handles much better than the RK, but the RK rides like a touring model.
I've "toured" many miles on cruisers (Heritages/Road Kings) so it's a matter or what you want.
#22
#24
BTW---I took a "tour" from Fayetteville, NC to the Blue Ridge Parkway and back last summer--SG felt fine to me. I'm "touring" next month from Fayetteville to Canada---I'll give my reviews later
#25
The Heritage definitely looks cool and it IS lower to the ground, which is precisely why it handles much WORSE than a RK. In the Heritage, the MoCo traded off lean angles to get that cool low-slung look. The Heritage has VERY restrictive lean angles and doesn't handle well at all in the twisties. This is not just my opinion--the MoCo puts lean angles for each model on its website. There is an 7-8 degree lean difference between the RK and the Heritage. That's alot.
#26
The Heritage definitely looks cool and it IS lower to the ground, which is precisely why it handles much WORSE than a RK. In the Heritage, the MoCo traded off lean angles to get that cool low-slung look. The Heritage has VERY restrictive lean angles and doesn't handle well at all in the twisties. This is not just my opinion--the MoCo puts lean angles for each model on its website. There is an 7-8 degree lean difference between the RK and the Heritage. That's alot.
#27
#28
I have a RKC and an Ultra. I like both, but the RK is my default selection currently, unless the wife is with me, then it's the Ultra.
I like the Ultra but it feels less like a motorcycle than the RK. The fairing is also noticeably heavy on the handlebars but its easy to get accustomed to.
If I had to pick 1, I would pick the RK, because I could take of the shield, or get a fairing and tour pak.
I like the Ultra but it feels less like a motorcycle than the RK. The fairing is also noticeably heavy on the handlebars but its easy to get accustomed to.
If I had to pick 1, I would pick the RK, because I could take of the shield, or get a fairing and tour pak.