Harley Davidson Forums

2014-2023 Touring Models This Section Is For Rushmore/2014-2023 Touring Models
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Best Cam for 103" HO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #71  
Old 01-17-2018, 01:43 PM
QNman's Avatar
QNman
QNman is offline
Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: St. Charles, MO
Posts: 6,851
Received 3,713 Likes on 1,988 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by bradsULtd
QNman, you probably already know this as this thread is a few months old now but the SE-204's are still in the 2018 SE P&A catalog on pg 73 with P/N : 25464-06 ('07-'16 Touring)...just an fyi...
I do know this, but thank you for making sure!
 
Reply Like
  #72  
Old 01-17-2018, 04:06 PM
nytryder's Avatar
nytryder
nytryder is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 4,011
Received 296 Likes on 176 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by rusty289
Ok guys, looking for advice and I know it's a bit of a subjective question but looking for thoughts on the best cam upgrade for a 103" HO?


2015 Road Glide Special


Best bang for your buck? Anyone have dyno numbers from their upgrade?


I've been doing some reading, looking at Andrews 57s. Don't really think I need the easy starts since the motor has ACRs already.


I did Andrews 48s in my 2009 SG 96" and was really happy with the results.


I'm seeing and reading about all different options for the 103" so lets have it, what do yas think?


Thanks!



OP. Loose the cat, keep the HO cams, and any muffler with a 2'' pipe. None of the cams listed above are bad, they just aren't that much better. Your HO cams are basically 255's. Get a good tuner and then some dyno time. Biggest bang for the buck IMOP. Dyno sheets are showing results at WOT. How often does anyone do that? On top of that you will never get the same read out on the same dyno twice. Hope this helps.
 
Reply Like
The following 2 users liked this post by nytryder:
rusty289 (01-18-2018), smurf211 (04-28-2023)
  #73  
Old 01-18-2018, 01:15 PM
rusty289's Avatar
rusty289
rusty289 is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: New Brunswick Canada
Posts: 353
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Default
Lots of good info and opinions in here.


Thanks all, feel free to add more.....
 
Reply Like
  #74  
Old 03-28-2018, 06:33 PM
rusty289's Avatar
rusty289
rusty289 is offline
Tourer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: New Brunswick Canada
Posts: 353
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Default
Anyone have any experience and or opinion on the fueling 574 cam??? I have a buddy that has a set I can get.

Thoughts???
 
Reply Like
  #75  
Old 03-28-2018, 07:19 PM
F350's Avatar
F350
F350 is offline
Intermediate
Join Date: May 2015
Location: fla
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
What about some se211 cams?I have some not sure if I should have them installed in the 103 or the 88.
 
Reply Like
  #76  
Old 03-28-2018, 07:23 PM
FNGonaRK's Avatar
FNGonaRK
FNGonaRK is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 11,309
Received 7,689 Likes on 2,680 Posts
Default
From the research I’ve done, I think i’ll Be going with the 777’s.
 
Reply Like
  #77  
Old 03-28-2018, 07:26 PM
rhuff's Avatar
rhuff
rhuff is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 48.067222,12.863611
Posts: 3,903
Received 1,118 Likes on 732 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by FNGonaRK
From the research I’ve done, I think i’ll Be going with the 777’s.
Then I think you should do yourself a favor and do more research. If you're doing a bolt-in only, I think you're going to be lacking the compression, especially in a heavy touring bike. Be far better served by the 555. Or really, prob the 222 if you're doing only bolt-in.
 
Reply Like
The following users liked this post:
jd05flhtci (03-28-2018)
  #78  
Old 03-28-2018, 07:30 PM
InthewindMN's Avatar
InthewindMN
InthewindMN is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,482
Received 238 Likes on 210 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by rhuff
Then I think you should do yourself a favor and do more research. If you're doing a bolt-in only, I think you're going to be lacking the compression, especially in a heavy touring bike. Be far better served by the 555. Or really, prob the 222 if you're doing only bolt-in.
Here’s my stock compression 103 with 999-6a cams, along with 2/1 exhaust and intake.
 
Reply Like
The following 2 users liked this post by InthewindMN:
357sig (03-02-2020), GalvTexGuy (03-28-2018)
  #79  
Old 03-28-2018, 08:33 PM
jd05flhtci's Avatar
jd05flhtci
jd05flhtci is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,669
Received 311 Likes on 249 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by InthewindMN

Here’s my stock compression 103 with 999-6a cams, along with 2/1 exhaust and intake.
If horsepower is what you are after that is a nice setup. But the cr570-2,tts100 or tw222 cams would of made more torque down low
 
Reply Like
The following users liked this post:
Bafflingbs (05-19-2018)
  #80  
Old 03-28-2018, 09:03 PM
GalvTexGuy's Avatar
GalvTexGuy
GalvTexGuy is offline
Seasoned HDF Member

Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: SE Tejas
Posts: 8,176
Received 3,956 Likes on 2,174 Posts
Default
Originally Posted by jd05flhtci
If horsepower is what you are after that is a nice setup. But the cr570-2,tts100 or tw222 cams would of made more torque down low
I'm kind of liking the 999-6a for down low torque, at least as it compares to the TW-222. But, we all know numbers can change from tune to tune.
 
Attached Thumbnails Best Cam for 103" HO-15-103-gutzmer.jpg  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Best Cam for 103" HO


Reply Closed Thread Share
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 AM.