Dyna Glide Models Super Glide, Super Glide Sport, Super Glide Custom, Dyna Glide Convertible, Super Glide T-Sport, Dyna Glide Police, Dyna Switchback, Low Rider, Street Bob, Fat Bob and Wide Glide.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

why the dislike of the fuelpak

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #151  
Old 01-25-2014, 08:04 AM
Foxster's Avatar
Foxster
Foxster is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Suffolk, England
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I think there's a chance they do so something for closed loop, but probably not enough after a short time.

What the fuelpak does is intercept the signal from the ECU to the injectors. It then changes the length of the pulses so that more or less fuel is added than the ECU is aiming for.

Which is OK so far. But the ECU reads this change in fuel via the O2 sensors and tries to correct it. So if it sets the injectors to achieve an AFR of, say, 14.6:1 but reads an AFR of 14.1:1 instead it will lean things out and drag the AFR back towards 14.6:1.

So there will be a push-pull in closed loop between the ECU and the fuelpak that will result in some indeterminate AFR actually being achieved.

Then there is the problem of AFV.

This is a system where on a stock setup if the ECU reads that it is having to make a long-term adjustment in closed loop, it will then apply those changes to open loop too. For instance, if you switch from gasoline to E10 then the ECU will adjust both closed and open loop to compensate based on the readings it takes in closed loop.

What happens with a fuelpak is that the ECU thinks the bike is running rich all the time and adjusts the closed loop as I said above but this also has a knock-on effect in open loop via AFV. So the changes the fuelpak is making to open loop get reduced too.

What this leads to is that immediately after fitting and adjusting of a fuelpak the bike could run well. However, by the time a few tanks of fuel have gone through, the tune will have drifted off to who knows where.
 
  #152  
Old 01-25-2014, 10:04 AM
SoCalSoftailSlim's Avatar
SoCalSoftailSlim
SoCalSoftailSlim is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,719
Received 59 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Foxster
I think there's a chance they do so something for closed loop, but probably not enough after a short time.

What the fuelpak does is intercept the signal from the ECU to the injectors. It then changes the length of the pulses so that more or less fuel is added than the ECU is aiming for.

Which is OK so far. But the ECU reads this change in fuel via the O2 sensors and tries to correct it. So if it sets the injectors to achieve an AFR of, say, 14.6:1 but reads an AFR of 14.1:1 instead it will lean things out and drag the AFR back towards 14.6:1.

So there will be a push-pull in closed loop between the ECU and the fuelpak that will result in some indeterminate AFR actually being achieved.

Then there is the problem of AFV.

This is a system where on a stock setup if the ECU reads that it is having to make a long-term adjustment in closed loop, it will then apply those changes to open loop too. For instance, if you switch from gasoline to E10 then the ECU will adjust both closed and open loop to compensate based on the readings it takes in closed loop.

What happens with a fuelpak is that the ECU thinks the bike is running rich all the time and adjusts the closed loop as I said above but this also has a knock-on effect in open loop via AFV. So the changes the fuelpak is making to open loop get reduced too.

What this leads to is that immediately after fitting and adjusting of a fuelpak the bike could run well. However, by the time a few tanks of fuel have gone through, the tune will have drifted off to who knows where.
I appreciate the thoughts. The proof will be in the pudding. If my bike continues to run like it is now, I highly recommend the FuelPak. But if it "drifts" as you say and the positive results don't hold, I'll be just as open about any failures.

That said, seems like plenty of folks have ran them for 10s of thousands of miles without issue.

See yall down the road on this. Enjoying my FuelPak so far.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fuelmoto
Fuel Moto / Jackpot Mufflers
2
05-28-2014 02:12 PM
jpowell490
Sportster Models
12
02-23-2008 05:07 PM
RAJ
Touring Models
9
01-09-2007 01:28 PM
hd_sob
Dyna Glide Models
3
08-16-2006 12:28 AM
XARAN
Softail Models
3
05-16-2006 03:16 PM



Quick Reply: why the dislike of the fuelpak



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 AM.