Twinkie.....
#11
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas! Ya mean there's someplace else?
Posts: 11,062
Received 1,212 Likes
on
462 Posts
RE: Twinkie.....
Cast-in main bearing race. A cast-in race means big bucks to repair, instead of just pressing out/pressing in a new race. Usually the crankcase will simply be trashed as it's not economical to repair.
Chain drive cams with a tensioner. Timing is sloppy, varying up to 4 degrees. Tensioner wear seems to follow no apparent cause/effect schedule, with some going well over 60k miles, and some dumpingat 20k miles.
No tappet blocks; they're part of the engine cases. When they wear out you might be able to go oversize once, but then after that it's new engine cases.
Heads are a good design, but don't breathe as well as needed if you get into much motor mods. That means more expense.
Connecting rods have no races so they're not rebuildable.
These are the reasons I wrote what I did about a "throwaway" engine. Don't get me wrong, there are a lot of really good things about the Twinkie motor, but I'm just wondering what we'll see down the road, 30 years from now. My point is, in my opinion (and we all know about how they smell), there are too many non-rebuildable parts on this engine. And I will admit that some of these may turn out to be overblown, but we'll have to wait and see about that. And since I'm over 50 I may never find out!
Chain drive cams with a tensioner. Timing is sloppy, varying up to 4 degrees. Tensioner wear seems to follow no apparent cause/effect schedule, with some going well over 60k miles, and some dumpingat 20k miles.
No tappet blocks; they're part of the engine cases. When they wear out you might be able to go oversize once, but then after that it's new engine cases.
Heads are a good design, but don't breathe as well as needed if you get into much motor mods. That means more expense.
Connecting rods have no races so they're not rebuildable.
These are the reasons I wrote what I did about a "throwaway" engine. Don't get me wrong, there are a lot of really good things about the Twinkie motor, but I'm just wondering what we'll see down the road, 30 years from now. My point is, in my opinion (and we all know about how they smell), there are too many non-rebuildable parts on this engine. And I will admit that some of these may turn out to be overblown, but we'll have to wait and see about that. And since I'm over 50 I may never find out!
#12
RE: Twinkie.....
I reckon when my motor wears out I will get a new factory replacement. I have 32K now and expect it will go 100K. I like the fact that I park it and no oil spots, ever. I have ridden it hard on the slab going 80+ for hours on end and no problems. Gas it up and hit the starter and go. 7K miles last summer on one trip and no issues. It may be a throw-away but I think it will last a good long time. I did just replace the tensioners and will probably go to gear drive or the new chains when I go back into the cam chest. I now have all the tools so going to gear drive (if my run out is ok - haven't checked it) next time and it won't be so expensive.
Tnicean
Tnicean
#13
RE: Twinkie.....
ORIGINAL: ultraultra
Around these parts a "twinkie" is a rump ranger..... I ain't going anywhere NEAR that!!
Around these parts a "twinkie" is a rump ranger..... I ain't going anywhere NEAR that!!
Man your right, Ive never heard it reference to a bike before.
#18
RE: Twinkie.....
ORIGINAL: 89FLHT
I've heard them called Twinkies since they first came out.
I've heard them called Twinkies since they first came out.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Unclescarhead
General Harley Davidson Chat
239
01-25-2024 09:12 PM
JohnnyRebKY
General Harley Davidson Chat
53
07-28-2014 11:54 AM
toby61
General Harley Davidson Chat
5
02-09-2010 03:14 PM