Why did they continue to rubber mount the Touring models
#1
Why did they continue to rubber mount the Touring models
Now that they have merged the Dyna and Softail into one model (like it or not) and made a rigid mount engine with twin balance shafts. I was just wondering why they choose to keep the new Touring family rubber mounted with one balance shaft? Not that I would prefer the new M8 engine solid mounted, in a Touring. But I actually like they have dampen the vibes a fair amount in the new M8 Touring family but you still have the smooth vibes.
#3
#4
I am going to go with, Harley Davidson likes to make incremental changes as it serves two purposes. Doesn't over load them if things go wrong and provides incentive to owners to keep buying new.
I hope the touring gets an option of fully counter balanced M8, it is really odd that the touring line has the shake at idle and not the softtails. So likely they just could not get it all done for 17?
for 19 I expect the touring line to at least get all LED lighting across the board as standard. If they could knock 50+ pounds of the touring line it would be awesome, something about V-twins seems to make manufacturers lazy
I hope the touring gets an option of fully counter balanced M8, it is really odd that the touring line has the shake at idle and not the softtails. So likely they just could not get it all done for 17?
for 19 I expect the touring line to at least get all LED lighting across the board as standard. If they could knock 50+ pounds of the touring line it would be awesome, something about V-twins seems to make manufacturers lazy
#5
Now that they have merged the Dyna and Softail into one model (like it or not) and made a rigid mount engine with twin balance shafts. I was just wondering why they choose to keep the new Touring family rubber mounted with one balance shaft? Not that I would prefer the new M8 engine solid mounted, in a Touring. But I actually like they have dampen the vibes a fair amount in the new M8 Touring family but you still have the smooth vibes.
The lack of the 114 in the touring bikes is a tell to me. Next year's outrage is likely to be the changes to the Touring line. People should be done complaining about the Softails by then.
The following users liked this post:
Campy Roadie (08-25-2017)
#6
The following users liked this post:
Campy Roadie (08-25-2017)
#7
That's what i see coming. Also, the Touring was updated not long ago, so they get another year out of it. It gives a push to the new Softails by giving them a year of being "better".
Trending Topics
#8
They didn't update the Touring this year. I expect there will be a new frame next year for the Touring that will be monoshock with a solid mount motor.
The lack of the 114 in the touring bikes is a tell to me. Next year's outrage is likely to be the changes to the Touring line. People should be done complaining about the Softails by then.
The lack of the 114 in the touring bikes is a tell to me. Next year's outrage is likely to be the changes to the Touring line. People should be done complaining about the Softails by then.
#9
#10
^^^ This. There have been rumors of a new frame for a while now. I would definitely be interested in an improved mono shock touring frame. I was riding mono shock sport bikes starting in the 80's and motocross bikes before that. They are superior to conventional twin shock designs. Stiffer inverted forks would also be a plus.
Last edited by RedNose44; 08-25-2017 at 12:32 PM.