Steve Cole's & $tonecold's Cam Testing
#291
The SE cam we tested was the SE462, a midrange cam. It's more like the TTS150 we also tested. I'm sure if you are looking for more low end torque, the SE447 should do a better job than the SE462 we tested. You're also running a 114, so it is going to react a little differently to a cam than a 107 not only because of extra displacement, but also higher compression. Cams are not really that expensive, some are less than $200 and you can get a Wood 22X on DCP for $300, so I think you should pick one that you think you will be satisfied with, rather than one that you got at a discount. In the long run, it may keep you have to swap out the cam again.
Good to know coming from somebody that seems so well respected on this site. Thank you for your input! I wonder if I even need a full exhaust (currently leaning towards the D&D Abuelo Cat) or if that would end up hurting low end torque. I don't know the diameter of the stock pipes compared to the D&D. Maybe just deleting the cat would be enough. I definitely want a little more volume than the stock exhaust with Cobra slip-ons offer on my Fat Bob, but I don't want obnoxiously loud.
#292
I haven't ridden a bike with a SE cam in it, but based on my research I'll agree with ridgidthumper. Besides slightly better gains than the SE torque cam, another reason I chose the WM8-22X over the SE cam was that I refuse to award HD with more money to change out the crap cam they stuffed in there with the one that should've come installed from factory.
The following users liked this post:
JatoTheRipper (02-14-2022)
#293
Good to know coming from somebody that seems so well respected on this site. Thank you for your input! I wonder if I even need a full exhaust (currently leaning towards the D&D Abuelo Cat) or if that would end up hurting low end torque. I don't know the diameter of the stock pipes compared to the D&D. Maybe just deleting the cat would be enough. I definitely want a little more volume than the stock exhaust with Cobra slip-ons offer on my Fat Bob, but I don't want obnoxiously loud.
The following users liked this post:
JatoTheRipper (02-14-2022)
#294
I haven't ridden a bike with a SE cam in it, but based on my research I'll agree with rigidthumper. Besides slightly better gains than the SE torque cam, another reason I chose the WM8-22X over the SE cam was that I refuse to award HD with more money to change out the crap cam they stuffed in there with the one that should've come installed from factory.
The following users liked this post:
JatoTheRipper (02-14-2022)
#295
I haven't ridden a bike with a SE cam in it, but based on my research I'll agree with ridgidthumper. Besides slightly better gains than the SE torque cam, another reason I chose the WM8-22X over the SE cam was that I refuse to award HD with more money to change out the crap cam they stuffed in there with the one that should've come installed from factory.
Last edited by mjwebb; 02-14-2022 at 04:29 PM.
The following users liked this post:
smitty901 (03-05-2022)
#296
etc. and, and etc...I mean. I got 1157 bulbs on my $32,000 'Special' version..pretty sure the same thing Plymouth used on my 1963 Valiant......and the crappy ball & socket shift linkage rod..I mean WTF is up wit dat !! those are some of the little of things that bother me most..LED lights should be standard, and enough of them to be safer than the lame offerings standard on many models
#297
The following users liked this post:
JatoTheRipper (02-18-2022)
#298
If this is addressed to me, I don't really know much about exhaust systems on M8s. I do know that I like quiet. I don't know if even the cat is hold back all that much HP. I do know that M8 do seem to be much more sensitive to exhaust flow than TCs. I suspect that much of has to do with how much the exhaust flows and overlap. 4 valve heads are much more efficient at exhaust scavenging than 2 valve heads. To much exhaust flow kills the scavenging and low end TQ. Talk to the Dyno guys that are doing M8s. Fuel Moto might have suggestions.
etc. and, and etc...I mean. I got 1157 bulbs on my $32,000 'Special' version..pretty sure the same thing Plymouth used on my 1963 Valiant......and the crappy ball & socket shift linkage rod..I mean WTF is up wit dat !! those are some of the little of things that bother me most..LED lights should be standard, and enough of them to be safer than the lame offerings standard on many models
The following users liked this post:
porkster (02-15-2022)
#299
#300
2020 RGL 114 RDRS 12,000 on it. Lifters seemed off . Not a new experience for me Decided to do them before it was to late. Here we go if you going to open it why not. Then a phone call to FM.
22X Woods cam. 22XE was an option but the numbers favored ranges I do not run in as much.
S&S lifters,Push rods ect
Dynojet Power visions never let me down yet
Already have a set of FM Jack pot mufflers here in a box
Jack pot 2-1-2 header sounds good add that to the list Please ship ASAP
That was fast all here the next day. Local INDY install. The woods 22X CAM was just what I wanted. Torque where I can use it with the Sidecar.
I also feel if SE cam was the only choice I would just leave it alone.
22X Woods cam. 22XE was an option but the numbers favored ranges I do not run in as much.
S&S lifters,Push rods ect
Dynojet Power visions never let me down yet
Already have a set of FM Jack pot mufflers here in a box
Jack pot 2-1-2 header sounds good add that to the list Please ship ASAP
That was fast all here the next day. Local INDY install. The woods 22X CAM was just what I wanted. Torque where I can use it with the Sidecar.
I also feel if SE cam was the only choice I would just leave it alone.
The following users liked this post:
porkster (03-05-2022)