Whats Your 110 Dyno Numbers
#151
Wow. Your previous AFR was throwing your power in the garbage. I bet this thing is night/day difference. Your new power band is smooth as can be!!
#152
My 2016 cvo dynod 91 hp and 110 tq. The mods are a set of crusher slipons and a tts tuner. I downloaded the stage 1 from tts with no tuning. The bike is now getting bored to 113 with the compression set at 10:8 tman 590 cams 58 throttlebody 5.3 injectors fuel moto xxx pipe with crusher mufflers. ccp should be 206.
#153
My 2016 cvo dynod 91 hp and 110 tq. The mods are a set of crusher slipons and a tts tuner. I downloaded the stage 1 from tts with no tuning. The bike is now getting bored to 113 with the compression set at 10:8 tman 590 cams 58 throttlebody 5.3 injectors fuel moto xxx pipe with crusher mufflers. ccp should be 206.
My Build is a little less aggressive, more of a touring/torque build, but love the 113 platform. Have fun with the build!
#154
Scott7d, my a/f ratios were not the big problem, I was running stock CVO mufflers, even running the auto tune it showed fat and was trying to lean the A/F. I was getting to much reversion from the restrictive mufflers causing the 02's to read fat. I was down around 84 lbs/ft at 3,300 and now near 118 lbs/ft. Now to get some 2.0 Fullsac bafffles and quiet the beast down. Hopefully power doesn't drop!
#155
Scott7d, my a/f ratios were not the big problem, I was running stock CVO mufflers, even running the auto tune it showed fat and was trying to lean the A/F. I was getting to much reversion from the restrictive mufflers causing the 02's to read fat. I was down around 84 lbs/ft at 3,300 and now near 118 lbs/ft. Now to get some 2.0 Fullsac bafffles and quiet the beast down. Hopefully power doesn't drop!
The following users liked this post:
roadglider05 (01-07-2017)
#156
Scott7d, my a/f ratios were not the big problem, I was running stock CVO mufflers, even running the auto tune it showed fat and was trying to lean the A/F. I was getting to much reversion from the restrictive mufflers causing the 02's to read fat. I was down around 84 lbs/ft at 3,300 and now near 118 lbs/ft. Now to get some 2.0 Fullsac bafffles and quiet the beast down. Hopefully power doesn't drop!
The following users liked this post:
roadglider05 (01-07-2017)
#158
Interesting cause I have 13' ultra cvo with same cams and stock bore. Only differences are in milled heads to get 10.5:1 per cam specs and running stock gutted/modified header with 110hp/122tq
#159
It is amazing how raising the compression on the 110" makes a remarkable difference in power. Moderate cams, intake, exhaust and a tuner, wake up the beast, Harley has given us the tool, we need to only massage. I was able to go from 84 lbs/ft to 120+ at the same rpm with a muffler change, CR upgrade and a great tune.