Getting to know the FXR/EVO
#1
Getting to know the FXR/EVO
Have been looking at a basically stock 1999 FXR and am in a quandary. I have been involved with Twinkies TC88/95) for the last 15 years and know a little about them and their quirks. The FXR/EVO is a different animal however.
'
Just what should I look out for in the FXR/EVO? What issues do they have that I may have to address in the future? I kow the TC's had issues with cam chain tensioners and oil pump upgrades etc. I am looking for what kind of problems I might encounter with the EVO and the FXR in general.
'
The bike is 1000 miles away from me so I plan to ride it home if it is up to it. I will not have a owners manual for some time so I need to know some basics like how big is the gas tank and mileage I can expect?
'
How does one check the oil?
'
Tire pressure? And all that good kind of stuff.
Thanks all in advance.
'
Just what should I look out for in the FXR/EVO? What issues do they have that I may have to address in the future? I kow the TC's had issues with cam chain tensioners and oil pump upgrades etc. I am looking for what kind of problems I might encounter with the EVO and the FXR in general.
'
The bike is 1000 miles away from me so I plan to ride it home if it is up to it. I will not have a owners manual for some time so I need to know some basics like how big is the gas tank and mileage I can expect?
'
How does one check the oil?
'
Tire pressure? And all that good kind of stuff.
Thanks all in advance.
#2
#3
#4
http://carlinidesign.com/Harley-Part...orque-Arm.html
But, there were a few years to avoid with the EVO because of thin or porous engine castings, they also has some failures of the inner (INA) cam bearing.
#5
#6
I just bought an 84 FXR and sold the twinkie. As much as I loved my road king the FXR is more fun to ride because it handles well, the frame is very well made and it has the harley sound I prefer vs the twinkie. Mine's been upgraded in the trans, primary and starter department so the biggest shortcomings of the 84 have been addressed. Mine being an 84 it's prior to ***** G leaning the rear shocks forward to change the look to a more traditional harley. Some say that effected handling. If you look at the FXR frame you can see some influence from the Norton featherbed and or old 80's CB650 in it. A bit of a knockoff of those frames but for good reason. That frame was dropped due to cost.
Ive heard of EVO case problems where they were good then they weren't then harley corrected it. Not sure of the years effected.
Ive heard of EVO case problems where they were good then they weren't then harley corrected it. Not sure of the years effected.
#7
The EVO engine and transmission aren't bolted together, that started with the Twin Cam. Big inch/power EVOs needed this to keep from cracking the inner primary due to twisting forces:
http://carlinidesign.com/Harley-Part...orque-Arm.html
But, there were a few years to avoid with the EVO because of thin or porous engine castings, they also has some failures of the inner (INA) cam bearing.
http://carlinidesign.com/Harley-Part...orque-Arm.html
But, there were a few years to avoid with the EVO because of thin or porous engine castings, they also has some failures of the inner (INA) cam bearing.
Trending Topics
#8
Drive belts...now that's another story.
#9
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Sandy Eggo's North County
Posts: 14,592
Received 5,388 Likes
on
2,952 Posts
Originally Posted by Bubba Zanetti
I've never owned an Evo but I have heard of cracked casings due to the way the motor and tranny are bolted together.
Below this and you were pretty much good.
Slightly above it and you should be ok.
Way above this and you'll need the torque arm.
Btw, the inner case fails in a "downward" motion.
Again, left in a stock (or near stock) configuration, fix the inner cam bearing, then ride that sucker!
#10