Sportster Models 883, 883 Custom, 1200 Custom, 883L, 1200L, 1200S, 1200 Roadster, XR1200, and the Nightster.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Thinking of lowering my roadster

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 09-20-2018, 07:05 AM
Jed Clampett's Avatar
Jed Clampett
Jed Clampett is online now
Stellar HDF Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Mid Con USA
Posts: 2,049
Received 2,029 Likes on 871 Posts
Default

Lower? Heck, I raised my Roadster 1 1/2".
 
  #12  
Old 09-20-2018, 03:33 PM
cHarley's Avatar
cHarley
cHarley is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Boynton Beach, FloriDuh
Posts: 16,320
Received 299 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

Lowering a Roadster is a sin.
 
  #13  
Old 09-20-2018, 08:40 PM
normannewguy's Avatar
normannewguy
normannewguy is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: rockford
Posts: 165
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

If you lower the rear without doing the front you have an issue like previous poster described
I dropped my '05 by putting on a set of take-off air shocks. Thinking the shocks were the 12 inch or 11.5 inch ones. Also threw on 1 in lowering blocks. I didn't touch the front end. I did notice a slightly slower feeling steering when traveling slow. Nothing major. Been that way for 12,000ish miles
What he changed was the rake and trail on the bike. He made it so it became longer. Great high speed stability but turning not so much. Here is a link that explains rake and trail :http://www.chopperhandbook.com/rake.htm
 
  #14  
Old 09-21-2018, 04:01 AM
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
grbrown is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 45,435
Received 2,852 Likes on 2,419 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by cHarley
Lowering a Roadster is a sin.
Very true - not a good starting point for a lowered riding style of any sort!
 
  #15  
Old 09-21-2018, 07:04 AM
ss27gogeta's Avatar
ss27gogeta
ss27gogeta is offline
Cruiser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: In
Posts: 163
Received 56 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

While I agree the roadster is not the best starting place for what I want now. probably should have gotten a 48. but the roadster had a few upgrades the 48 did not have for the same price.
 
  #16  
Old 09-21-2018, 07:46 AM
Dudepants's Avatar
Dudepants
Dudepants is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,564
Received 588 Likes on 330 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ss27gogeta
While I agree the roadster is not the best starting place for what I want now. probably should have gotten a 48. but the roadster had a few upgrades the 48 did not have for the same price.
do your thing man, don’t let anyone sway you otherwise. I’m a pretty small dude, weigh about 135lbs and I haven’t noticed any discomfort or change in ride quality lowering my bike.
 
  #17  
Old 09-21-2018, 12:10 PM
samhallnc's Avatar
samhallnc
samhallnc is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Elm City, NC
Posts: 934
Received 54 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

I went the other way, and raised my Low. I did the rear shocks first and it made the geometry of the ride screwy.. I don't know how to explain it other than that it felt like a different bike and unpredictable. After I raised the front to match it returned to normal, but with vastly improved ride quality and lean angle.
 
  #18  
Old 09-21-2018, 12:12 PM
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
grbrown is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 45,435
Received 2,852 Likes on 2,419 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by samhallnc
I went the other way, and raised my Low. I did the rear shocks first and it made the geometry of the ride screwy.. I don't know how to explain it other than that it felt like a different bike and unpredictable. After I raised the front to match it returned to normal, but with vastly improved ride quality and lean angle.
I did the same, I now have a 'Super-not-so-Low', with longer shocks and the excess stock sag in the forks rectified.
 
  #19  
Old 09-21-2018, 09:08 PM
normannewguy's Avatar
normannewguy
normannewguy is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: rockford
Posts: 165
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by samhallnc
I went the other way, and raised my Low. I did the rear shocks first and it made the geometry of the ride screwy.. I don't know how to explain it other than that it felt like a different bike and unpredictable. After I raised the front to match it returned to normal, but with vastly improved ride quality and lean angle.
It's called rake and trail , follow the link
 
  #20  
Old 10-22-2019, 08:17 PM
gdelgado217's Avatar
gdelgado217
gdelgado217 is offline
Stage III
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Beecher, IL
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ss27gogeta
I'm thinking of lowering my roadster. thinking about the 10 inch burley shocks open to other options to. I believe the stock roadster shocks are 13 inches? If I lower it that much will I need to adjust the forks for the drop or would they be ok.
Hi there, what did you end up doing. I'm thinking about slammers for my Roadster
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LABoomer
Touring Models
36
04-21-2019 01:54 PM
13FXDBinCT
Dyna Glide Models
16
05-15-2013 06:52 AM
1450rdking
Touring Models
2
05-08-2013 11:47 PM
Cygnus x-1
EVO
8
09-30-2011 03:19 AM
Lorance66
Dyna Glide Models
2
11-24-2008 03:55 AM



Quick Reply: Thinking of lowering my roadster



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 AM.