Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Love the power, hate the MPG's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-05-2009, 07:27 PM
my06NT's Avatar
my06NT
my06NT is offline
Cruiser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Love the power, hate the MPG's

Before the 95" upgrade, I was getting around 40 mpg (hwy/city mix).

After the upgrade, getting around 32-34 mpg.

I love the power, and really like to get on the throttle, but I did not think the drop would be this big.

Have any otheres expierenced this?

Mike.
 
  #2  
Old 05-05-2009, 07:31 PM
1flhtk4me's Avatar
1flhtk4me
1flhtk4me is online now
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Billings,Mt.
Posts: 10,659
Likes: 0
Received 86 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

I only experienced the oppisite.Average 45.
Re-tune.
 
  #3  
Old 05-05-2009, 07:34 PM
OldArmy's Avatar
OldArmy
OldArmy is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: x
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Sure it's not just a right wrist problem with all that new power on tap?
 
  #4  
Old 05-05-2009, 07:38 PM
my06NT's Avatar
my06NT
my06NT is offline
Cruiser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I do get on it more after the upgrade, but still did not think I would loose 8 mpg.

I have only run 2 tanks since the upgrade, maybe it will get better?

Mike.
 
  #5  
Old 05-05-2009, 07:49 PM
Bertk's Avatar
Bertk
Bertk is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 5,788
Received 203 Likes on 177 Posts
Default

Sounds like it needs a good tune. It's running rich.
 
  #6  
Old 05-05-2009, 07:54 PM
tallboy56's Avatar
tallboy56
tallboy56 is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NC Mountains
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Guess what else is probably gonna get worse? Tire wear!
 
  #7  
Old 05-05-2009, 07:56 PM
Intrepid175's Avatar
Intrepid175
Intrepid175 is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas City, TX
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1FLTRI4ME
I only experienced the opposite.Average 45.
Re-tune.
Yeah, but were you cranking on it like my06NT admits to doing?

At least the OP is being honest when he admits what he's doing and that's the first step. A retune "might" fix, or at least help the problem but won't if the rider spends most of their time with that right wrist pointed straight at the ground!

Bottom line is, there's no free lunch. It takes burning fuel to make power and the more power you ask the engine to produce, the more fuel it's going to consume doing it.

As for those who get better gas mileage after the FI mods, this is my opinion on that. What's good for emissions isn't necessarily good for fuel economy and it's definitely not good for performance. I think that's why so many folks report a fuel mileage improvement after richening up their fuel mixtures. The bike it running happier and as long as the rider doesn't ask the bike for more performance, on average, they wind up getting a couple of mpg better. I'm still researching what I want to do with my bike and I "hope" I'll see a fuel economy improvement with it but I know that won't happen if I use the full potential of the performance improvements I should also see. In the end, it'll be as much about how "I" ride the bike as it will be about the mods I've made to the bike.

We'll see!
Ride Safe,
Steve R.
 
  #8  
Old 05-05-2009, 08:00 PM
harleyflyboy's Avatar
harleyflyboy
harleyflyboy is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,807
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

The correct mixture for most air breathing engines is 15 lbs of air to 1 lb of fuel. More power equals more fuel, more fuel equals less mileage. Or, more power requires more heat (combustion) more heat requires more fuel. Like someone else said "no free lunch".
 

Last edited by harleyflyboy; 05-05-2009 at 08:03 PM.
  #9  
Old 05-05-2009, 08:00 PM
my06NT's Avatar
my06NT
my06NT is offline
Cruiser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have had it tuned while doing the upgrade, both HP and TQ hit the target where I wanted 100/100 and the air/fuel ratio was inline as well.

What should the air/fuel be set at for best MPG?

As a note, when I had it tuned, I told the guy I wanted the max power fromt he set up, but I just did not think my mpg would drop that much.
I was expecting a drop of 5mpg or so not closer to 10 mpg.

Mike
 
  #10  
Old 05-05-2009, 08:04 PM
KoalaCowboy's Avatar
KoalaCowboy
KoalaCowboy is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Metro Denver
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As others have said, you should look into a re-tune. With my 103" Stage III, I am averaging 43+ mpg. Last Sunday, on a 250 mile ride with 10-12 mph winds, I averaged 44.13mpg

One tank full, when I really got on the throttle a lot, I averaged 41.88 which was lower than I anticipated, but still pretty damn good!
 


Quick Reply: Love the power, hate the MPG's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 AM.