Engine Mechanical Topics Discussion for motor builds, cams, head work, stripped bolts and other engine related issues. The good and the bad. If it goes round and around or up and down, post it here.

Scott @ Hillsidecycle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 01-05-2017, 10:16 AM
prodrag1320's Avatar
prodrag1320
prodrag1320 is offline
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: deland,florida
Posts: 3,569
Received 622 Likes on 398 Posts
Default

compaired to the same motor with 10.5-1 it is.im not going to get in a pissing match with you,we build ALOT of motors & use ALOT of S&S 585 cams,now maybe by some voodoo crap,they work different in a evo than a TC (never put one in a evo),but they don't like compression under 10.5-1,bigger displacement motors can get away with lower compression(around 10.2-1 or 10.3-1),but not 9.5-1.(don't really care if it came from S&S like that or not)and if its a TUV motor,it is a EPA motor (not USA,but your EPA,whatever that may be)
 

Last edited by prodrag1320; 01-05-2017 at 10:21 AM.
  #12  
Old 01-05-2017, 10:30 AM
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
grbrown is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 45,435
Received 2,852 Likes on 2,419 Posts
Default

I simply commented on my experience, that's all. Happy new year....
 
  #13  
Old 01-05-2017, 10:15 PM
Dave0176's Avatar
Dave0176
Dave0176 is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brick NJ
Posts: 303
Received 176 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wickerham
Andrews 57 or SE 204
The SE 204 will give ya that badass, nasty idle
That's the cams I got SE204 stock 103 with .030 head gaskets. And it sounds like a Harley lol.
 
  #14  
Old 01-06-2017, 12:57 PM
dfwhockey17's Avatar
dfwhockey17
dfwhockey17 is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 2,400
Received 283 Likes on 250 Posts
Default

Graham, I am not saying you are wrong (I completely value your opinion on this forum) about the 585 in your EVO, but in a small displacement Twin Cam I agree with Kirby that they will be flat on the bottom without compression. I currently have them in my 95" build in my bagger set to 10.5:1 and they really don't shine until I am up over 3k rpm (3300rmp to be more exact). From there to the redline the bike is a rocket. I am actually going 98", changing the heads and installing some CR575's (will set to 10:1) this winter to move the power significantly to the left. I will gladly sacrifice the HP up top to gain TQ down low...
 
  #15  
Old 01-06-2017, 01:12 PM
98hotrodfatboy's Avatar
98hotrodfatboy
98hotrodfatboy is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Poolville
Posts: 17,628
Received 4,817 Likes on 3,319 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dfwhockey17
Graham, I am not saying you are wrong (I completely value your opinion on this forum) about the 585 in your EVO, but in a small displacement Twin Cam I agree with Kirby that they will be flat on the bottom without compression. I currently have them in my 95" build in my bagger set to 10.5:1 and they really don't shine until I am up over 3k rpm (3300rmp to be more exact). From there to the redline the bike is a rocket. I am actually going 98", changing the heads and installing some CR575's (will set to 10:1) this winter to move the power significantly to the left. I will gladly sacrifice the HP up top to gain TQ down low...
That's where it is, down low.... Just make sure the drive train can handle it....
 
  #16  
Old 01-06-2017, 05:07 PM
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
grbrown is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 45,435
Received 2,852 Likes on 2,419 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by dfwhockey17
Graham, I am not saying you are wrong (I completely value your opinion on this forum) about the 585 in your EVO, but in a small displacement Twin Cam I agree with Kirby that they will be flat on the bottom without compression. I currently have them in my 95" build in my bagger set to 10.5:1 and they really don't shine until I am up over 3k rpm (3300rmp to be more exact). From there to the redline the bike is a rocket. I am actually going 98", changing the heads and installing some CR575's (will set to 10:1) this winter to move the power significantly to the left. I will gladly sacrifice the HP up top to gain TQ down low...
You should sample a stock 111"! I'm not the one doing the arguing here, I'm simply commenting on first-hand experience of my bone stock engine and what it does. It's a touring engine, designed and sold by S&S expressly for that application. Their current V111/T111 has the same cam for the same purpose, with a similar low CR, as indeed does the touring T143". Mine is great and isn't 'flat', regardless of what anyone says. In the meantime I'll enjoy the ride with a smile!
 
  #17  
Old 01-07-2017, 04:13 PM
prodrag1320's Avatar
prodrag1320
prodrag1320 is offline
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: deland,florida
Posts: 3,569
Received 622 Likes on 398 Posts
Default

Im not "arguing" either,just stating where the 585's like to be set as far as compression goes.fact,not just my opinion.if you think your motor.set @9.5-1 isnt flat on the bottom,ide advise you find one set at 10.5-1,im thinking your assessment of your motors power will change
 
The following users liked this post:
boston jim (01-07-2017)
  #18  
Old 01-08-2017, 01:28 PM
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
grbrown is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 45,435
Received 2,852 Likes on 2,419 Posts
Default

We're going round in circles - it is also very happy with a lower CR. Fact!
 
  #19  
Old 01-08-2017, 06:59 PM
98hotrodfatboy's Avatar
98hotrodfatboy
98hotrodfatboy is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Poolville
Posts: 17,628
Received 4,817 Likes on 3,319 Posts
Default

Obviously the 585 is a very versatile cam... Good for motors from 88" through 124". Cams will also react differently based on cubic inches. Graham i would love to see a Dyno sheet on a lower compression build..... When i decreased the compression on my Evo and went to a longer stroke, I ended up with a lot more than i thought would get...
 
  #20  
Old 01-09-2017, 06:31 AM
grbrown's Avatar
grbrown
grbrown is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bedford UK
Posts: 45,435
Received 2,852 Likes on 2,419 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by 98hotrodfatboy
Obviously the 585 is a very versatile cam... Good for motors from 88" through 124". Cams will also react differently based on cubic inches. Graham i would love to see a Dyno sheet on a lower compression build..... When i decreased the compression on my Evo and went to a longer stroke, I ended up with a lot more than i thought would get...
It certainly seems to be all things to all men. I have a dyno sheet, showing both true dual pipes and my Supertrapp 2-into-1. Unfortunately it is rather faint and doesn't scan well enough to post it, otherwise I would have done so. I'll see what I can come up with! The graphs below are early runs with my original TDs, showing around 90TQ or more from 2,500rpm through to 5,500rpm. The Supermeg raises that hollow in the torque curve to just above the 100 mark throughout. S&S used to publish dyno sheets, but I haven't found them on their current website. Mine is near as damn it as per their published figures at the time I bought it.

 


Quick Reply: Scott @ Hillsidecycle



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 PM.