Scott @ Hillsidecycle
compaired to the same motor with 10.5-1 it is.im not going to get in a pissing match with you,we build ALOT of motors & use ALOT of S&S 585 cams,now maybe by some voodoo crap,they work different in a evo than a TC (never put one in a evo),but they don't like compression under 10.5-1,bigger displacement motors can get away with lower compression(around 10.2-1 or 10.3-1),but not 9.5-1.(don't really care if it came from S&S like that or not)and if its a TUV motor,it is a EPA motor (not USA,but your EPA,whatever that may be)
Last edited by prodrag1320; Jan 5, 2017 at 10:21 AM.
Graham, I am not saying you are wrong (I completely value your opinion on this forum) about the 585 in your EVO, but in a small displacement Twin Cam I agree with Kirby that they will be flat on the bottom without compression. I currently have them in my 95" build in my bagger set to 10.5:1 and they really don't shine until I am up over 3k rpm (3300rmp to be more exact). From there to the redline the bike is a rocket. I am actually going 98", changing the heads and installing some CR575's (will set to 10:1) this winter to move the power significantly to the left. I will gladly sacrifice the HP up top to gain TQ down low...
Graham, I am not saying you are wrong (I completely value your opinion on this forum) about the 585 in your EVO, but in a small displacement Twin Cam I agree with Kirby that they will be flat on the bottom without compression. I currently have them in my 95" build in my bagger set to 10.5:1 and they really don't shine until I am up over 3k rpm (3300rmp to be more exact). From there to the redline the bike is a rocket. I am actually going 98", changing the heads and installing some CR575's (will set to 10:1) this winter to move the power significantly to the left. I will gladly sacrifice the HP up top to gain TQ down low...
Graham, I am not saying you are wrong (I completely value your opinion on this forum) about the 585 in your EVO, but in a small displacement Twin Cam I agree with Kirby that they will be flat on the bottom without compression. I currently have them in my 95" build in my bagger set to 10.5:1 and they really don't shine until I am up over 3k rpm (3300rmp to be more exact). From there to the redline the bike is a rocket. I am actually going 98", changing the heads and installing some CR575's (will set to 10:1) this winter to move the power significantly to the left. I will gladly sacrifice the HP up top to gain TQ down low...
Im not "arguing" either,just stating where the 585's like to be set as far as compression goes.fact,not just my opinion.if you think your motor.set @9.5-1 isnt flat on the bottom,ide advise you find one set at 10.5-1,im thinking your assessment of your motors power will change
Obviously the 585 is a very versatile cam... Good for motors from 88" through 124". Cams will also react differently based on cubic inches. Graham i would love to see a Dyno sheet on a lower compression build..... When i decreased the compression on my Evo and went to a longer stroke, I ended up with a lot more than i thought would get...
Obviously the 585 is a very versatile cam... Good for motors from 88" through 124". Cams will also react differently based on cubic inches. Graham i would love to see a Dyno sheet on a lower compression build..... When i decreased the compression on my Evo and went to a longer stroke, I ended up with a lot more than i thought would get...










