Truth about Tuners
#1
Truth about Tuners
Here it goes, I want to install SE255 cams in my 2011 Limited, so I need a tuner. I am looking for a tuner that will be installed by a dealer or independent Tuner, I don't care about price, I want a tuner that will get the most performance of of my Bike, but I also want something that can be installed and I do not have to keep tinkering with, I want to ride, not wrench. All the Harley dealers that I have been to suggest the SEPST, Whenever I inquiry about one with autotune, they suggest against it, saying everybody has nothing but problems with them, is this true or is it because they want to sell the SEPST. I am interested in the ThunderMax With Autotune, when asking two Performance dealers, (not Harley Dealers) about the ThunderMax, they advised against it because nothing but problems and it never reaches optimum performance because it is always adjusting itself, I thought that was the way it got optimum performance by doing just that. How can someone find out which is actually a better tuner, or which tuner will give the most benefit, not recommended because it the model they sell or because it's cheaper than the other one.
#2
I would find the tuner you plan on using first, then purchasing whatever tuner he is most comfortable using. I personally don't care for autotune, for a couple reasons. 1, it is still recommended by the manufactureres of them to have your bike dyno tuned before using the autotune feature, but 2nd, if your bike is self adjusting it might make an adjustment for a problem you are having, then you wouldn't know the symptons and the problem could get worse. Like a leaky intake seal, The autotune would just throw more fuel to compensate for the lean conditions caused by the seal leaking. you may never know you had a problem.
#3
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The Internet (& Dyer, Indiana)
Posts: 7,580
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
I would find the tuner you plan on using first, then purchasing whatever tuner he is most comfortable using.
But first, find a local tuner with a reputation, not just any ol' tuner.
Find one that folks rave about.
Then ask which unit he prefers, and why. No need to have him adjusting a unit that he isn't fond of.
#4
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
I ran the Thundermax last year and you are right I was always tinkering with it.It never did run quite right.It seemed like it would adjust itself til it ran like crap.
I put the stock ecm back in and bought a SEPST.Loaded a base map and it runs better than it ever has.Decel popping is gone.I haven't done any smart tunes yet,so we will see how that works out.Have only road about 20 miles and it's still cold out,but so far I like it.
I put the stock ecm back in and bought a SEPST.Loaded a base map and it runs better than it ever has.Decel popping is gone.I haven't done any smart tunes yet,so we will see how that works out.Have only road about 20 miles and it's still cold out,but so far I like it.
#9
OTOH I have heard that ThunderMax requires a close map to auto-tune effectively, but I never thought of this as being something as close as a dyno-tune. I have no experience with T'Max but also understand the TBW versions are much better in some areas than the older versions. For the older versions there were issues with spark advance and the lack of knock sensing.
...but 2nd, if your bike is self adjusting it might make an adjustment for a problem you are having, then you wouldn't know the symptons and the problem could get worse. Like a leaky intake seal, The autotune would just throw more fuel to compensate for the lean conditions caused by the seal leaking. you may never know you had a problem.
#10
I haven't seen anything in DynoJet literature or forum discussions that the PCV-AT should have a dyno-tune prior to installing. On that system if you can get a map that provides close spark-advance tables the system will auto-tune AFR's with map you install, even one with zeroed values in the Fuel Adj. tables. I'm not doubting that you've seen such a recommendation from DynoJet, but would like to read then entire text if you could provide a link. Perhaps you are referring to the need to establish good spark-advance tables first, which is true.
This is true, but you would see the inconsistency between cylinders in the trim table. If both are leaking, to use that example, you would see an abnormally rich trim value in areas that produce high vacuum levels. Instead of a seat-of-the-pants approach to diagnosing some problems you could see them on your computer.