I'm looking for feedback on this cam. Am equally interested in feedback in the 57h in my RK 103? Anyone with firsthand experience.

 

57h in a 103 is a good all around cam. More than one review on it. Just search Andrews 57h. The kury should be similar. Depending on your riding style. It has a late intake close which would seem to come on a little later.

 

The Kuryakyn TC24D and the Andrews 57H are close enough on specs you would find it hard to tell the difference on same bike and tune. The Andrews may have 1 or 2 torque below 2500 and the Kuryakyn more above 3000. Don't think you would regret either one.

 

my charts on the 57h with street port from Kirby @ VeeTwin. also talk to Ed @ The Dyno Difference in Dallas. He swears by those KURY cams with great results.

 

Like others above have already stated, both choices are good cams for a 103".
The Andrews was made for the 103" motors air is a truly bolt in cam.

Some of the boys on the CVO site have installed the KUR. TC24D cams, some mild head work, 58 mm TB and getting some really nice results.
119-123 HP 120-125 TG.

ALMOST solid square numbers!



YB

 

Without headwork I'd go with 57s in a 103. That is what it was designed for.

 

Some of those CVO guys should try a DME 575L(Dave Mackie) , i'll bet it is even a bit better than the TC-24 in a 110 with 110 heads

 

For sure!
Some them boys do run Dave Mackie grinds, and show very, very, impressive
Numbers.




YB