Originally Posted by Missouri Snowman
(Post 14136845)
what if your just running two speakers?
|
Will you ever do this for some of the heavy hitter amps?
ie.: JL 400/4 or 600/6, Hertz HDP4, Alpine PDX, Arc Moto 600.4, ect |
perhaps this winter.
I would need people to temporarily donate their amp(s). my tests are on the bike as you can read in the test documents so it always takes some effort to get it all set up. |
AAWAV
How would you compare the ST 4.1000D to the Rockford Fosgate PBR 300 X 4? Thanks |
Originally Posted by Drifter-10
(Post 14721581)
AAWAV
How would you compare the ST 4.1000D to the Rockford Fosgate PBR 300 X 4? Thanks |
EDITED, sorry did not see the ST.
ST series I had on the shelve for testing but did not even bother as the PA 4.2000D did not meet the specs on paper by far. ST is probably worse than the PBR300x4. general consensus here is the PBR300x4 is WAY UNDERPOWERED to achieve loud sound. hence I have not bench tested it. the PBR series in general are ubderspec;d meaning f.e. the PBR300x2 I started with on my bike was 150W RMS but birthsheet stated 192. Nevertheless, the SS PN4.1000D or PA RZ4.3000D (OVERSPEC'D! is same amp as SS) is the way to go on a budget (150 bucks for an amp!). you will potentially lose FM reception, as stated over and over on this forum. and yes it will fit in the batwing |
Thanks for the info AAWAV and Babyboy. Now to stuff it inside a Road Glide fairing
|
Thanks for doing these tests, writing up and sharing the results. They are very helpful.
FWIW, I noticed a slight difference between the BT4180's test document and collated summary page (1st post in this thread). The test doc states 160wpc and the summary page states 150wpc. If the correct value is 160wpc, then I am curious why the BT2180 tested less than the BT4180 if BT is using the same UcD boards for both amps. HTH |
Originally Posted by G29
(Post 15004001)
Thanks for doing these tests, writing up and sharing the results. They are very helpful.
FWIW, I noticed a slight difference between the BT4180's test document and collated summary page (1st post in this thread). The test doc states 160wpc and the summary page states 150wpc. If the correct value is 160wpc, then I am curious why the BT2180 tested less than the BT4180 if BT is using the same UcD boards for both amps. HTH |
Great information. Thank you.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands