Andrews 48h stock gearing?
These cams sound exactly like what i'm looking to get in my 96" Dyna, Especially since I have zero plans of ever tearing into the engine. It just irks me when I'm constantly hearing these descripted as a bagger cam! They sound like they'd be a good fit for me but i dont ride a bagger. But I do spend 90% of my riding in the 2,500-3,500 range and when i do get on it i like to rev out to 4,600-4,900 before grabbing the clutch. So you guys tell me are the 48H's cams for me? or should i be looking else where?
Last edited by tonebone_79; Nov 29, 2014 at 03:10 PM.
Did a search and found this dyno sheet from a few years back, should give you an idea...Still carries almost 90# torq out to 5000 rpms
Last edited by Low FLHTK; Nov 28, 2014 at 07:21 PM. Reason: complete post
Seems to me like this cam would be a blast to ride! Especially with a lighter dyna. That Torque hits 90tq at 2,700 and doesnt drop below 90tq til 4,800. thats pretty much where i ride..
57's Come on about the same and carry longer.
Last edited by Pigbacon; Nov 28, 2014 at 08:11 PM.
SuedeBlue just finished installing a set on his Bob and another member is about to do it as well.
48 or 57 both great choices.
48 or 57 both great choices.
These cams sound like exactly what i need for my 96" street bob, Especially since I have zero plans of ever tearing into the engine. It just bothers me when I'm constantly reading these descripted as a bagger cam! They sound like they'd be a good fit for me. I spend 90% in the 2,300-3,300 range, but when i get on it i rev out to 4,600-4,900 before grabbing some clutch. So you guys tell me are the Andrews 48H cams for me? or should i be looking else where?
The heavy baggers really need the extra toque down low so they work really well with them, but they run really strong on lighter bikes. They make the bike lots more fun to ride. You'll always have a smile on your face with these cams.






