2007 96 to 110?
#1
05-23-2018, 09:38 PM
2007 96 to 110?
I did a search and really didnt find anything. I just got a new to me 2007 96 Ultra Classic. It runs ok but im a power nut. Can i jusy buy the SE 110 tire sheader kit and it work? Ok, i know that i will need a tune, intake, exhaust, and maybe some other small things. But does it all bolt up without machine shop work? I know i can go to 103 but for the $$ it doesnt seam that much more to just get the 110 kit. Thanks,
#2
05-23-2018, 09:55 PM
Road Master
Yes ...the 110 bolt on kit from Harley ....is just that ...
but you should read this post ....first ...if you are a real .."power nut " ...
https://www.hdforums.com/forum/engin...-lbs-pics.html
you'll thanks them later ...!!!
but you should read this post ....first ...if you are a real .."power nut " ...
https://www.hdforums.com/forum/engin...-lbs-pics.html
you'll thanks them later ...!!!
#3
05-23-2018, 10:28 PM
Road Master
not sure if crank cases need boring for the 110 on that year of engines. pretty sure they increased the hole size in crank cases in the later years of the twin cam so no boring was required, always thought case boring was required for even my 2009 year. some of the engine builders in here would know for sure, max headflow ,, prodrag, scott from hillside.
#4
05-23-2018, 10:32 PM
not sure if crank cases need boring for the 110 on that year of engines. pretty sure they increased the hole size in crank cases in the later years of the twin cam so no boring was required, always thought case boring was required for even my 2009 year. some of the engine builders in here would know for sure, max headflow ,, prodrag, scott from hillside.
#5
05-23-2018, 11:18 PM
Springers4ever,
Thanks for the link. Wow, big numbers! Ok, maybe my pockes aren’t deep enough for that kind of power. Thanks again.
Thanks everyone else for conferming I can go to 110” from 96” without machine work.
I guess at this point I need to decide if as my daily ride its better to build as a 96”. 103, or jump to 110.”
Thanks for the link. Wow, big numbers! Ok, maybe my pockes aren’t deep enough for that kind of power. Thanks again.
Thanks everyone else for conferming I can go to 110” from 96” without machine work.
I guess at this point I need to decide if as my daily ride its better to build as a 96”. 103, or jump to 110.”
#7
05-24-2018, 10:01 AM
Road Master
Springers4ever,
Thanks for the link. Wow, big numbers! Ok, maybe my pockes arent deep enough for that kind of power. Thanks again.
Thanks everyone else for conferming I can go to 110 from 96 without machine work.
I guess at this point I need to decide if as my daily ride its better to build as a 96. 103, or jump to 110.
Thanks for the link. Wow, big numbers! Ok, maybe my pockes arent deep enough for that kind of power. Thanks again.
Thanks everyone else for conferming I can go to 110 from 96 without machine work.
I guess at this point I need to decide if as my daily ride its better to build as a 96. 103, or jump to 110.
No matter which way you go ...high compression ...big cams ..etc...or just a bump in compression and good low end cam ...what matters in either case ...is the correct head work and the final tune ...with any build ....
if you do a 12:1 compression motor ...and no head work ...and can't tune it properly ...guess what ...it won't run as good as the stock **** you have now ..!!!
good luck ...!!!
Trending Topics
#8
05-24-2018, 10:22 AM
#9
05-25-2018, 11:24 AM
#10
05-25-2018, 10:14 PM
That 570-2 would be my choice for that combination as well. I think I would stay at 10:1 or slightly below, though. CCP is going to be right at 205 at 10:1 and I wouldn't want to go any higher than that. Even 205 needs a good tune to work well.