Wego file
#11
#12
You have to have the Wego Log software installed on your computer to display the file as a graph.
Without the Wego Log software installed on your computer, the zip file extracts to a text file that makes no sense and doesn't show any graphed results.
You can supposedly get the software from this website:
http://www.daytona-sensors.com/
I took a quick look and I think you can download the software from the choices under the "Tech Center" header, but I wasn't able to tell easily which software was the "Wego Log" software needed.
Without the Wego Log software installed on your computer, the zip file extracts to a text file that makes no sense and doesn't show any graphed results.
You can supposedly get the software from this website:
http://www.daytona-sensors.com/
I took a quick look and I think you can download the software from the choices under the "Tech Center" header, but I wasn't able to tell easily which software was the "Wego Log" software needed.
Still not thrilled about the newer software not allowing a run to be spread out like a dyno graph, makes it harder to read.
#13
Didn't realize they changed it. My original disk should have all the proper functions to expand....
#14
#15
Did some more work, was able to cross the graph into my old software and spread it out. Copied a WOT throttle run and a long cruise run, easy to read and more accurate, the graphs can be expanded by clicking on them and dragged for better viewing
Your long cruise was at 4000 rpm's, you are really cruising
Your long cruise was at 4000 rpm's, you are really cruising
Last edited by 1997bagger; 01-26-2019 at 11:55 PM.
#16
Here is reversion on the current graph, decel off higher rpms to 4000, the red line is the rpms falling off and the green is the AFR's climbing to 16.4 by pulling air backwards into to cylinder thru the exhaust and not enough fuel to combat it but not much can be done about it except a more restrictive exhaust. Install a more restrictive exhaust to battle reversion and all of the AFR numbers will richen and may have to rejet, the graphs show just how critical and touchy tuning can be
Last edited by 1997bagger; 01-26-2019 at 11:55 PM.
#17
Great job bagger.. thank you for the assistance...
Like you said the first two graphs are spot-on I wouldn't touch a thing and ask for the D cell yet that's going to happen with that RB pipe you're going to see it like that.
There's not enough back pressure to decrease the amount of reversion there.
So John you're spot-on I wouldn't touch a thing you're looking real good man. You anoint gonna get much better than that....
Like you said the first two graphs are spot-on I wouldn't touch a thing and ask for the D cell yet that's going to happen with that RB pipe you're going to see it like that.
There's not enough back pressure to decrease the amount of reversion there.
So John you're spot-on I wouldn't touch a thing you're looking real good man. You anoint gonna get much better than that....
Last edited by 98hotrodfatboy; 07-22-2017 at 07:25 PM.
#19
My older software allows me to spread the graph, sent the old software to Harold and he was able to spread the graph. Don't know why Daytona did away with it
#20
Great job badger.. thank you for the assistance...
Like you said the first two graphs are spot-on I wouldn't touch a thing and ask for the D cell yet that's going to happen with that RB pipe you're going to see it like that.
There's not enough back pressure to decrease the amount of reversion there.
So John you're spot-on I wouldn't touch a thing you're looking real good man. You anoint gonna get much better than that....
Like you said the first two graphs are spot-on I wouldn't touch a thing and ask for the D cell yet that's going to happen with that RB pipe you're going to see it like that.
There's not enough back pressure to decrease the amount of reversion there.
So John you're spot-on I wouldn't touch a thing you're looking real good man. You anoint gonna get much better than that....