EVO All Evo Model Discussion

EV13 Cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-26-2012, 07:21 PM
shovelhead FXEF's Avatar
shovelhead FXEF
shovelhead FXEF is offline
Cruiser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: North Bend Ohio
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default EV13 Cam

was looking to instal EV13 in my 1995 Ultra. Does anybody have any experience using this cam in a heavy bagger? I would like even a little more low end than my stock cam. Engine has 46K miles, so i'm looking to re-do the cam, bearings and the top end
 
  #2  
Old 08-26-2012, 08:01 PM
badcooky's Avatar
badcooky
badcooky is offline
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Location location.
Posts: 3,097
Received 473 Likes on 370 Posts
Default

Apparently It's a good little cam,you will pick up bottom to mid but aIt's little flat up top.
 
  #3  
Old 08-26-2012, 08:11 PM
shovelhead FXEF's Avatar
shovelhead FXEF
shovelhead FXEF is offline
Cruiser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: North Bend Ohio
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by badcooky
Apparently It's a good little cam,you will pick up bottom to mid but aIt's little flat up top.
Is it a worth while upgrade from the stock cam? I usually only tach up to 3500 on the highway. I don't want to make a parallel move from stock.
 
  #4  
Old 08-26-2012, 08:43 PM
Jclind1966's Avatar
Jclind1966
Jclind1966 is offline
Intermediate
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've got the EV13 it give a nice boost in the midrange
 
  #5  
Old 08-26-2012, 09:38 PM
Schex's Avatar
Schex
Schex is online now
Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 5,201
Received 6,816 Likes on 1,760 Posts
Default

I'm planning on that cam for my Ultra too, since it rarely sees over 4000.
 
  #6  
Old 08-26-2012, 10:48 PM
LowriderHarold's Avatar
LowriderHarold
LowriderHarold is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New Albany, Ms.
Posts: 620
Received 92 Likes on 54 Posts
Default I think it is

Can't say for a bagger, but dry weight of my Lowrider is 598 lbs, I go 230lbs, & my ole lady is 180lbs. Do the math. Pulls great to about 3500-4000rpms. Great torque around town. Why I chose this cam. Wanted the torque for 2 up riding, & sweet spot is about 80mph/3250rpms out on the interstate, stock gearing. Average about 36-37 mpg. I put all other upgrade info on my garage page. I like it.
Ride Safe,
Harold
 
  #7  
Old 08-27-2012, 09:01 AM
StuxnetKiller's Avatar
StuxnetKiller
StuxnetKiller is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You'll find a lot of info on that subject here and the general consensus is; Andrews EV13 for Baggers, Andrews EV27 for Softails.
 
  #8  
Old 08-27-2012, 10:43 AM
LowriderHarold's Avatar
LowriderHarold
LowriderHarold is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New Albany, Ms.
Posts: 620
Received 92 Likes on 54 Posts
Default Info

Roadhog96 nailed it's behaviour on this post. Good information. I also e-mailed Andrew's about compression ratio's you can use with the EV13 & the EV27 & this was the response I got. And I quote:


I recommend 9.25:1 (stock is 8.5:1) for the EV13 cam and 9.5:1 for the EV27 cam.

Thank you,

Gary Wallace
Technical Support

Andrews Products, Inc
431 Kingston Court
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
847-759-0190
847-759-0848 Fax
gwallace@andrewsproducts.com
www.andrewsproducts.com

Would love to hear from rider's who have used these compression ratio's, with these cam's. My only concern, with these compression's, and as crappy as gas is today, I don't wan't to be hauling a bottle of octane booster around in my saddlebag's. Sorry for the hijack of this thread. Just trying to get info put out here to aid in your choice, mine, and whoever, shovelhead FXEF. End of hijack.
Ride safe,
Harold
 
  #9  
Old 08-27-2012, 12:31 PM
Schex's Avatar
Schex
Schex is online now
Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 5,201
Received 6,816 Likes on 1,760 Posts
Default

Correct, it's better to go with slightly less compression and be able to put the timing to it and leaner jetting, rather than lower timing and richer just to combat detonation. IMO
 
The following users liked this post:
Garageking (12-07-2020)
  #10  
Old 08-27-2012, 03:24 PM
Nostalgia_93's Avatar
Nostalgia_93
Nostalgia_93 is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

On my Softail Nostalgia (1993), I've the EV-13, Mikuni, K&N air filter, high perf Crane roller tappets and the bike gained A LOT of low and mid raw power, comparing it with stock cam. It has stock compression.

When riding in group, I usually cruise at 80/90 mph, and the bike hasn't any trouble getting faster in a hurry if needed (although I like that speed range).

I have the cam from last January. The article Roadhog96 wrote was among the ones I readed, wich made me choose it instead of other options, works like he states.

If I hadn't it, would install the EV-13 again in a heartbeat, Joe Minton did a great job designing it!

Cheers,
 

Last edited by Nostalgia_93; 08-27-2012 at 03:34 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Garageking (12-07-2020)


Quick Reply: EV13 Cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 AM.