General Harley Davidson Chat Forum to discuss general Harley Davidson issues, topics, and experiences.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Should Harley have a counter balanced rubber mounted motor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 09-03-2007, 01:49 AM
Ironhorseman's Avatar
Ironhorseman
Ironhorseman is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Grove, MO
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: No

How about a counterbalanced, rubber mounted, offset throw crankshaft with water cooling? Oh wait, that's called a Honda.............and the rigid mount motor that takes batteries is called a vibrator! Don't care for either one, sorry!
 
  #32  
Old 09-03-2007, 02:23 PM
INDEPENDENTBIKEWORKS's Avatar
INDEPENDENTBIKEWORKS
INDEPENDENTBIKEWORKS is offline
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: No

ORIGINAL: Nadil

ORIGINAL: sonar_chris

ORIGINAL: Nadil

ORIGINAL: INDEPENDENTBIKEWORKS

ORIGINAL: Jerry L

ORIGINAL: flyklr

Harley already has a rubber mounted counter balanced bike, the Vrod.
FLYKLR beat me to it. Yep, if they could do it, it would already have been done. LOL. Well, they can, and they did. I'd love to see one in a softail frame.
Jerry
And Liquid cooled.
Man, and notice how that DOESNT affect any of you who want a traditional motor? So it would be FINE if they made a bigger engine that way, and put it in some other bikes. mostly the big tourers.
JUST AS LONG AS THEY KEPT A TADITIONAL AIRCOOLED MOTOR AVAILABLE.
Right?
Then what is the purpose of this post? Harley already makes what the OP questioned us about.
This pole was for big twin motors not the V-rods Thats why.

Chris
Then I stand by my first reply. [sm=forgetit.gif]
So, you wouldnt buy that one, youd buy the traditional motor. But WHY shouldnt they build the other ALSO??
Again, I think they should offer a CHOICE.
 
  #33  
Old 10-15-2007, 11:41 AM
murphyslaw1978's Avatar
murphyslaw1978
murphyslaw1978 is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: No

I test rode a bunch of cruisers, many of which had dual-pin cranks, rubber mounts and were otherwise balanced. These inluded:

Honda Shadow ACE 2006
Honda VTX 1300 2006
Kawasaki Vulcan 1100
Kawasaki Vulcan Mean Streak
Suzuki c109r
Yamaha Road Star 1500
Yamaha V-star 1100

Of all these bikes, the one I like most was the HD Road King '99. The reason is because of the engine noise and the vibrations. If you want a smoother ride, then I think any of the Jap bikes are going to be a much better fit for you. They are also much cheaper.

The only reason to get a Harley is if you like the sound, feel and look, IMO. Otherwise, go metric and save yourself a lot of money Oh, one more thing: the HD was pretty light and nimble-feeling as opposed to some of the other bikes, like the Kawasaki. That was another reason.

 
  #34  
Old 10-15-2007, 12:15 PM
quackhead's Avatar
quackhead
quackhead is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Morton IL
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: No

i like mine shaking...keeps me awake at traffic lights.
 
  #35  
Old 10-15-2007, 12:37 PM
TowJam's Avatar
TowJam
TowJam is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: No

If you're going to counterbalance the engine, why bother rubber mounting it? Rigid mounting will eliminate the rear swing-arm flex that is characteristic of the Tourers/Dynas.

Personally, I'd like to see a counterbalanced, rigid mounted engine - but with the better suspension of the Tourers and Dynas (as opposed to the Softails').
 
  #36  
Old 10-15-2007, 01:18 PM
cadman311's Avatar
cadman311
cadman311 is offline
Club Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: DUNDALK,MARYLAND
Posts: 4,892
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: No

Why dose counterbalanceing the engine have less horse power?
 
  #37  
Old 10-15-2007, 01:21 PM
AK_Hog_Herder's Avatar
AK_Hog_Herder
AK_Hog_Herder is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Alaska
Posts: 3,015
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: No

While I believe the counter balanced motor has a place in the line like in the cruisers, it should not be in all bikes.

That balancer is sucking HP and fuel to a certain degree so I wouldn't want it on a touring bike.
 
  #38  
Old 10-15-2007, 01:41 PM
cwilks's Avatar
cwilks
cwilks is offline
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: St.Louis, MO.
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: No

I'm thinking there's a whole lot of guys who are riding a Harley that REALLY should be on something else
 
  #39  
Old 10-15-2007, 02:08 PM
89FLHT's Avatar
89FLHT
89FLHT is offline
Stellar HDF Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,324
Received 138 Likes on 78 Posts
Default RE: Should Harley have a counter balanced rubber mounted motor?

WTF ? Do any of you actually ride a rubber mount? If you did, you would know that there is NOTHING to fix. Mines an old rubber mount and it runs smooth everywhere at every speed. Who gives a **** if it vibrates when you are ideling? It's not like your going to sit on the bike for an hour straight at a stop light.

 
  #40  
Old 10-15-2007, 02:17 PM
murphyslaw1978's Avatar
murphyslaw1978
murphyslaw1978 is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Should Harley have a counter balanced rubber mounted motor?

ORIGINAL: 89FLHT

WTF ? Do any of you actually ride a rubber mount? If you did, you would know that there is NOTHING to fix. Mines an old rubber mount and it runs smooth everywhere at every speed. Who gives a **** if it vibrates when you are ideling? It's not like your going to sit on the bike for an hour straight at a stop light.

I'm pretty sure some people like the fact that it shakes at idle. I know I do.
 


Quick Reply: Should Harley have a counter balanced rubber mounted motor?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 PM.