cam chain tensioner shoe
#11
The original problem seemed to be rough edges on the chains caused by dull stamping dies , along with the high pressure tensioner springs and poor shoe material in the early 88's. All these issues had been addressed years ago.
The issue I wonder about on the M8's are how are the comp's fairing ?
The issue I wonder about on the M8's are how are the comp's fairing ?
#12
The original problem seemed to be rough edges on the chains caused by dull stamping dies , along with the high pressure tensioner springs and poor shoe material in the early 88's. All these issues had been addressed years ago.
The issue I wonder about on the M8's are how are the comp's fairing ?
The issue I wonder about on the M8's are how are the comp's fairing ?
as far as the compensators, that should be a different thread / post
#13
#14
The following users liked this post:
tenn volunteer (03-04-2018)
#15
yeah, the woes of pre hydraulic yesteryear are well documented..sounds like the preventative maintenance on the M8 shoe should be treated the same as the TCs, good idea to replace around 50K since going through the trouble of inspecting is a fair amount of work. Nothing ever in the manuals about it being an inspect or replace item..heck, I dunno', maybe HD believes they are a lifetime of the bike item
as far as the compensators, that should be a different thread / post
as far as the compensators, that should be a different thread / post
The following users liked this post:
mjwebb (03-04-2018)
#16
I tore my M8 down at 12,000 miles to do a Stage II. Tensioner shoe wear was not seen, nor could I feel any wear with my fingernail.
I pulled my twin cam down at 88,000 miles to check for wear and I found the shoes to be grooved about half way through the plastic. Of course I replaced them but I came away thinking that those shoes would have easily went 100k if I wanted to chance it. Of course when you are tore down already, to not replace them would have been foolish on my part. No question about it, the hydraulic tensioners that replaced the spring tensioners were a big step forward. And, as often is the case, I wonder to myself why it takes the MOCO years to make fundamental changes in anything. But that is another topic for a later discussion.
I pulled my twin cam down at 88,000 miles to check for wear and I found the shoes to be grooved about half way through the plastic. Of course I replaced them but I came away thinking that those shoes would have easily went 100k if I wanted to chance it. Of course when you are tore down already, to not replace them would have been foolish on my part. No question about it, the hydraulic tensioners that replaced the spring tensioners were a big step forward. And, as often is the case, I wonder to myself why it takes the MOCO years to make fundamental changes in anything. But that is another topic for a later discussion.
Last edited by Retrop; 03-04-2018 at 09:57 AM.
The following users liked this post:
mjwebb (03-04-2018)
#17
The M8 has compression relief and beefer stator for more electrical startup so less strain on the comp. My old Dyna stage 4 with new batteries was a slow cranking beast and I would hold my breath as she slowly cranks over with the SE comp working hard!. Not with the M8 she cranks fast and free.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post