My warranty was never voided. All my warranty work was fully covered. My 2017 CVO Limited was an open book for Harley or my dealership to inspect to ensure it was compliant under the terms of factory warranty. And my bike was fully compliant. If it wasn't, the sumping claims would have been denied.

I have no clue what you are talking about relatively to HD going to court. Sounds like someone is hitting the sauce a little too early. As I've said before and will likely say again, if you have a problem with my posts.... well .... that's a problem you'll need to address on your own. because I ain't going anywhere. I stand by my challenge.... go ahead... try and find any post where I bad mouth HD.

 

So tell us...Did you or did you not edit your old posts to remove any evidence of you performing warranty voiding modifications?

I know the answer but want to hear you say it.

 

I don't get credibility from you or anyone else. I'm not selling anything and I have nothing to gain from others on the forum. Therefore credibility is utterly irrelevant to me. If someone finds the information I share useful, then "mission accomplished". If others don't find it useful...so what??...who cares?? It doesn't change anything for you or me or anyone else. Credibility on an open forum is meaningless unless the person posting has something to gain or lose. I have nothing to gain or lose so credibility is meaningless. If I can help a few guys by "paying it forward"... then all is good from my perspective.

 

The 2 things are not mutually inclusive. Editing posts does not necessarily have anything to do with modifications that impact a bike's warranty. My bike was fully compliant from a warranty perspective (as HD confirmed) AND I edited posts. Just like I edit almost all of my posts... after the fact. What you neglect to remember is that I had the SE Street Tuner installed on my bike from shortly after delivery which is a fully compliant tuner.

 

Spin city.

 

 

Uh huh. Fact city huh?

So here is a quote of yours (that you tried to delete) that shows your lyin *** changing history (again) to spin things in your favor.
Taken from the below thread where all can see you trying to remove evidence that could have had HD voiding your warranty.
https://www.hdforums.com/forum/milwa...ose-vents.html

 

 

Dude, you're utterly impossible to even communicate with. You twist words every which way and slide and slip and dodge like the most experienced politician. You lie, you change words, you accuse other people of lying, you claim you never said what you clearly did say, and you make ad hominem attacks on people who call you out.

Here's the simplest example. In post #76, which you can't edit to change now, you said Then, in the very same thread, you disavowed your own words by telling LP
There is a massive difference between "we could make almost ANY M8 bike sump" and "If a bike will sump I can make it happen."

One of those statements is an alarmist, FUDdist declaration that every M8 owner has a defective time bomb on their hands. Which is exactly the kind of thing I've been complaining about you saying -- it's baseless, you're wrong, and your only possible hope in continuing to say things like this is to damage Harley.

But let's look at your example anyway. You're the self-appointed king of sumping, who says (in your own words and with your own capitalization) "a good rider ... will bring out sumping in MOST M8s" and "we could make almost ANY M8 bike sump." It's hogwash, utter hogwash, and I'll use YOUR OWN EXAMPLE to prove it.

You say you can make almost ANY M8 bike sump. Yet, your own experience proved you were UNABLE to make ANY M8 engine sump, unless it was a CVO Stage IV.

The M8 comes in a lot of varieties and a lot of different bikes, of varying weights from 650 to nearly 1000 pounds, whether 107, 114, or 117 ci, with different cams, injectors, throttle bodies, etc. You have sumped a grand total of ONE of those combinations, and utterly failed repeatedly to sump any other combination.

Let's look at your track record:
# of oil-cooled Softail engines sumped: 0
# of oil-cooled Touring engines sumped: 0
# of twin-cooled stock CVO engines sumped: 0 out of 2
# of modified, powervisioned, Jackpot-headered twin-cooled CVO Stage IV engines sumped: 1
# of twin-cooled CVO Stage IV engines sumped: 2 out of 3.

You sumped a modified, jackpot-headered, Powervisioned CVO Stage IV (which, frankly, doesn't sound that hard to do, since a huge percentage of the sumping reports we have are from Stage IV bikes). They put a new stock engine, and you couldn't sump it even after trying. They upgraded it to Stage IV, and you sumped it. They put in a new stock engine, and you tried repeatedly to sump it, and could not. In fact, you tried for 8 months to get it to sump, and you couldn't. So then you upgraded that engine to Stage IV, and you sumped it. They then put in another CVO Stage IV engine in, and you tried your damndest to sump it and were unable to.

Your own experience has shown that you can't sump "most" Harleys, in fact you've only ever been able to sump a CVO Stage IV, and even then not every time.

Your rhetoric is toxic and misleading. You lie, you try to cover up your lies, you accuse people of misquoting you, you accuse them of being "drunk" when they point out the facts. Well, for everyone interested, this thread holds the facts, and points to your own words, which you cannot edit and change. (although next you'll probably claim that your account was hacked and someone else made those posts about the PowerVision).

 

So that's how you tricked HD? Good admission.
Same bike though, same engine, same should have been voided warranty, same guy saying he didn't change posts, same guy that caused us to loose the ability to edit posts, thus...same guy with no credibility.

Dude you're a straight up liar. A liar. Exposed Sir.