Milwaukee Eight (M8) 2017 and up M8 Air and Liquid Cooled discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

SE447 Torque Cam vs aftermarket

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #51  
Old 06-15-2019, 10:33 AM
Northside's Avatar
Northside
Northside is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,395
Received 141 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Simply comparing one cam to another isn't going to get you anywhere fast. You have to consider the whole system from intake to exhaust. It's no secret some cams respond better with one exhaust than another or vice versa. Some cams respond better to compression increases and that needs to be taken into account when choosing a cam. I chose to go with a Red Shift 468 and a D&D Billet Cat because the 468 was developed with a Billet Cat per Zippers. My bike dynode max torque at 2850 rpm. or about 75 mph. right where I wanted it on my '17 107 RGS. It was tuned with a Power Vision. The number was 126 but dynos vary. It held over 110 tq til 4900 rpm, but again that's just a number. It's torquey as hell and is fun to ride. I seriously doubt any SE setup could possibly compare.
There are quite a few cams that are capable of delivering similar performance to my Red Shift 468. Just remember the intake and exhaust need to work well with the cam that you choose.

My point is get a system from air cleaner to exhaust tip of parts that work well together!
 
The following 2 users liked this post by Northside:
3dognate (06-15-2019), Wmitz (06-16-2019)
  #52  
Old 07-12-2019, 08:07 PM
hog95023's Avatar
hog95023
hog95023 is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Booming metropolis
Posts: 3,542
Received 161 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jackmack
So was interested to read about SS475; just had the SE447 put in my 19 RG 114. Already had Kromewerks 2/2, and ac and SE tuner (to keep warranty). I didn't notice much difference. My local guy claims if I let hime do the SS kit with 475 cam that the difference will be huge. Doesn't sound like it. I have a Thundermax tuner that I may use instead of SE tuner; hoping that helps. Just came off a 17 107 stage 4 that seemed much faster. Opinion if its worth changing tuner or cam without adding inches?
Damn, the shop quoted me 3k for the stage II today. think I will pass,
 
  #53  
Old 07-12-2019, 08:24 PM
Quik's Avatar
Quik
Quik is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: On my bike!
Posts: 5,063
Received 2,572 Likes on 1,524 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hog95023
Damn, the shop quoted me 3k for the stage II today. think I will pass,

Shop around, just had my 2019 done, $1500 total and that included cam, lifters, push rods, aluminum pushrod cuffs, tuner, installed and dyno tuned.
 
  #54  
Old 07-12-2019, 08:54 PM
hog95023's Avatar
hog95023
hog95023 is offline
Elite HDF Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Booming metropolis
Posts: 3,542
Received 161 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Quik
Shop around, just had my 2019 done, $1500 total and that included cam, lifters, push rods, aluminum pushrod cuffs, tuner, installed and dyno tuned.
the 3k seems steep but included CFR mufflers, Big breather, tuner and then the stage II stuff. still steep.
 
  #55  
Old 12-09-2019, 05:48 PM
KingPin16's Avatar
KingPin16
KingPin16 is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: OKC
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So I have a 2019 Road Glide Special. I did a stage 2 torque cam upgrade to my 114. when I 1st got it done, it ran great. Use to be able to pull up the front end in 1st and 2nd, and Im a 300 pounder. Now the bike won't pull under heavy throttle without spark knock. So I took it to Harley, several Harley dealerships for that matter. Everyone of them said nothing is wrong with it and that I'm lugging it at 2200 to 2500 RPMS. So I tied the Power Cam tune with the toque cam installed. The spark knock has subsided, but the question is, why was the spark knock existing? and 2 will the power cam tune harm the engine with the torque cam installed. I also have the wide band SE auto tuner installed, didn't fix the spark knock on the W006 tune. Seems to work with the W007 tune though. Any help would be most welcomed. Thanks.
 
  #56  
Old 12-09-2019, 05:54 PM
702's Avatar
702
702 is offline
Grand HDF Member

Join Date: May 2018
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,714
Received 5,381 Likes on 2,233 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KingPin16
So I have a 2019 Road Glide Special. I did a stage 2 torque cam upgrade to my 114. when I 1st got it done, it ran great. Use to be able to pull up the front end in 1st and 2nd, and Im a 300 pounder. Now the bike won't pull under heavy throttle without spark knock. So I took it to Harley, several Harley dealerships for that matter. Everyone of them said nothing is wrong with it and that I'm lugging it at 2200 to 2500 RPMS. So I tied the Power Cam tune with the toque cam installed. The spark knock has subsided, but the question is, why was the spark knock existing? and 2 will the power cam tune harm the engine with the torque cam installed. I also have the wide band SE auto tuner installed, didn't fix the spark knock on the W006 tune. Seems to work with the W007 tune though. Any help would be most welcomed. Thanks.

This guy had a similar problem------ https://www.hdforums.com/forum/milwa...adventure.html
 
  #57  
Old 12-09-2019, 07:22 PM
FLTRI17's Avatar
FLTRI17
FLTRI17 is offline
Stellar HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,023
Received 599 Likes on 414 Posts
Default

If the bike runs better, without detonation, and gets good mileage, you are much better than running it while detonating.
Bob
 
The following users liked this post:
JatoTheRipper (10-18-2021)
  #58  
Old 12-12-2019, 03:11 AM
yobtaf103's Avatar
yobtaf103
yobtaf103 is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 830
Received 274 Likes on 176 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by $tonecold
So here is the dyno sheet that Steve is talking about in this post:



So now if you want to kind of see how the 447 compares to an RS468 you would have to look at these two charts and extrapolate.





You have to note that the first chart runs are fifth gear runs and the other charts are sixth gear runs. I imagine the two TTS100 runs would be about the same if both were in the same gear.

So in the first chart the TTS100 made 7 more ft/lb. of torque and 6 more hp than the 447. In the second two charts the RS468 made 5 more ft/lb. of torque and 5 more hp. than the TTS100. So I would say all other things being equal, the RS468 will make about 10 more ft/lb. of torque and 10 more hp. than the SE8-447 in an M8 107.
Interesting heres my 107 RGS chart, RS468 PV, FM header/outlaw slip-ons

 
  #59  
Old 12-12-2019, 04:10 PM
Bdeuce12's Avatar
Bdeuce12
Bdeuce12 is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 317
Received 127 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

My 2019 RKS Stage 2 all HD except exhaust dyno'd at 95hp 114tq. Very similar to these graphs.
 
  #60  
Old 12-12-2019, 07:21 PM
Softy 103's Avatar
Softy 103
Softy 103 is offline
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,910
Received 259 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bdeuce12
My 2019 RKS Stage 2 all HD except exhaust dyno'd at 95hp 114tq. Very similar to these graphs.
Not trying to be an ***, but that aint that much better than stock. Mine came in at 91hp and 118 Tq. with just a heavy breather and a fuel moto pipe, tuned with power vision and no cam.
 


Quick Reply: SE447 Torque Cam vs aftermarket



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 PM.