M8 Throttle body and Intake 55 vs 64mm
#1
M8 Throttle body and Intake 55 vs 64mm
I was doing some research on replacing my plastic intake with the SE 55mm one. While researching I saw Moonshine Harley posted a video last month saying if you can afford it to go to a 64mm on even a stage two. Im currently a 114 with a zippers 468. HAs anyone else besides them done this and can verify it's worth the money. Seems like it would be too large and slow down airflow.
#4
I was doing some research on replacing my plastic intake with the SE 55mm one. While researching I saw Moonshine Harley posted a video last month saying if you can afford it to go to a 64mm on even a stage two. Im currently a 114 with a zippers 468. HAs anyone else besides them done this and can verify it's worth the money. Seems like it would be too large and slow down airflow.
I did the SE 64 mm and manifold several years ago on my 2017 107 M8 with just a stock engine for testing. What is does require is for the ECM to be reprogrammed to make it work properly. Without reprogramming it lost lower RPM torque and HP, with reprogramming the ECM it stayed the same as the stock setup. Every throttle body made including the stock one is to large for the engine at the lower RPM area, as they must be designed to handle the engine at the higher RPM range! With the Electronic Throttle the ECM controls when and how far it opens. Set properly you can run most any of several sizes of them and your going to get the same results. If you go way to big it gets harder to control at small opening points, as it just moves to much air with very small changes in the position of the throttle but going from a stock 55mm up to the 64mm was no big deal.
The following 2 users liked this post by Steve Cole:
cmathison (12-06-2022),
Glenn Gorman (11-30-2022)
#5
I did the SE 64 mm and manifold several years ago on my 2017 107 M8 with just a stock engine for testing. What is does require is for the ECM to be reprogrammed to make it work properly. Without reprogramming it lost lower RPM torque and HP, with reprogramming the ECM it stayed the same as the stock setup. Every throttle body made including the stock one is to large for the engine at the lower RPM area, as they must be designed to handle the engine at the higher RPM range! With the Electronic Throttle the ECM controls when and how far it opens. Set properly you can run most any of several sizes of them and your going to get the same results. If you go way to big it gets harder to control at small opening points, as it just moves to much air with very small changes in the position of the throttle but going from a stock 55mm up to the 64mm was no big deal.
The following users liked this post:
BigD48 (09-08-2022)
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
#10
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Santa Barbara California
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
The SE version of the intake (as stated on the dyno chart) isn't the stock version being talked about. The stock version is a plastic 55mm that just sucks. Going with the SE55mm intake (aluminum not plastic) will have the same gains(ish) as the 64mm TB and manifold. But if you're going to upgrade get the 64mm setup so when you do go big bore on the engine you don't have to reinvest. Take a look at the videos my Moonshine Harley....great info and comparisons with side by side data.
The following users liked this post:
madmat (09-09-2022)