Milwaukee Eight (M8) 2017 and up M8 Air and Liquid Cooled discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

M8 Throttle body and Intake 55 vs 64mm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-20-2022, 10:59 AM
PyroMedic's Avatar
PyroMedic
PyroMedic is offline
Cruiser
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Rochester Ny
Posts: 140
Received 19 Likes on 10 Posts
Default M8 Throttle body and Intake 55 vs 64mm

I was doing some research on replacing my plastic intake with the SE 55mm one. While researching I saw Moonshine Harley posted a video last month saying if you can afford it to go to a 64mm on even a stage two. Im currently a 114 with a zippers 468. HAs anyone else besides them done this and can verify it's worth the money. Seems like it would be too large and slow down airflow.
 
  #2  
Old 02-20-2022, 11:21 AM
MikeySom's Avatar
MikeySom
MikeySom is offline
Road Captain

Join Date: May 2006
Location: S.I.N.Y.
Posts: 633
Received 345 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

I have a 114 with zippers 468 S&S air cleaner Bassani RR3 and stock plastic intake and wouldn't think changing it, bike runs good I would save the money for something else.
 
The following users liked this post:
cmathison (12-06-2022)
  #3  
Old 02-20-2022, 12:11 PM
NHBAGGER's Avatar
NHBAGGER
NHBAGGER is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Barrington, NH
Posts: 383
Received 56 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

So that would be a manifold and throttle body change for a 114?
Wonder what their thinking is?
 
  #4  
Old 02-20-2022, 12:31 PM
Steve Cole's Avatar
Steve Cole
Steve Cole is offline
HD EFI Guru
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,901
Received 3,502 Likes on 1,608 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PyroMedic
I was doing some research on replacing my plastic intake with the SE 55mm one. While researching I saw Moonshine Harley posted a video last month saying if you can afford it to go to a 64mm on even a stage two. Im currently a 114 with a zippers 468. HAs anyone else besides them done this and can verify it's worth the money. Seems like it would be too large and slow down airflow.

I did the SE 64 mm and manifold several years ago on my 2017 107 M8 with just a stock engine for testing. What is does require is for the ECM to be reprogrammed to make it work properly. Without reprogramming it lost lower RPM torque and HP, with reprogramming the ECM it stayed the same as the stock setup. Every throttle body made including the stock one is to large for the engine at the lower RPM area, as they must be designed to handle the engine at the higher RPM range! With the Electronic Throttle the ECM controls when and how far it opens. Set properly you can run most any of several sizes of them and your going to get the same results. If you go way to big it gets harder to control at small opening points, as it just moves to much air with very small changes in the position of the throttle but going from a stock 55mm up to the 64mm was no big deal.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by Steve Cole:
cmathison (12-06-2022), Glenn Gorman (11-30-2022)
  #5  
Old 02-20-2022, 02:22 PM
1badharley's Avatar
1badharley
1badharley is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 163
Received 46 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Cole
I did the SE 64 mm and manifold several years ago on my 2017 107 M8 with just a stock engine for testing. What is does require is for the ECM to be reprogrammed to make it work properly. Without reprogramming it lost lower RPM torque and HP, with reprogramming the ECM it stayed the same as the stock setup. Every throttle body made including the stock one is to large for the engine at the lower RPM area, as they must be designed to handle the engine at the higher RPM range! With the Electronic Throttle the ECM controls when and how far it opens. Set properly you can run most any of several sizes of them and your going to get the same results. If you go way to big it gets harder to control at small opening points, as it just moves to much air with very small changes in the position of the throttle but going from a stock 55mm up to the 64mm was no big deal.
Just curious on the test .....did it net you any gain in HP?
 
The following users liked this post:
BigD48 (09-08-2022)
  #6  
Old 02-20-2022, 07:44 PM
rdc401's Avatar
rdc401
rdc401 is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: pontotoc ms
Posts: 1,152
Received 120 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

I posted one where a good friend of mine put a 64 mm throttle body on a 114 with 22xe cam.I ready didn’t think it was worth the money unless I was planning on going big bore
 
  #7  
Old 02-20-2022, 08:01 PM
Steve Cole's Avatar
Steve Cole
Steve Cole is offline
HD EFI Guru
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,901
Received 3,502 Likes on 1,608 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1badharley
Just curious on the test .....did it net you any gain in HP?
It was the same within test to test variability.
 
  #8  
Old 02-26-2022, 08:29 AM
Bannana Boat's Avatar
Bannana Boat
Bannana Boat is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 606
Received 50 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

I added it to mine when it was a 114 with a cam and it made 4-5 tq/hp mostly in the middle to top of the rpm band. The only upgrade I made at that time was the SE 64 with a ported manifold and then a dyno run.
 
  #9  
Old 02-27-2022, 05:56 PM
BigT12's Avatar
BigT12
BigT12 is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 184
Received 88 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

The attached dyno sheet shows a 124” with the stock throttle body and stock intake manifold making over 140 hp and torque. I doubt you would see any gain’s upgrading to. 64mn throttle body in a 114”
 
  #10  
Old 09-08-2022, 01:30 PM
BlackTout's Avatar
BlackTout
BlackTout is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Santa Barbara California
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BigT12
The attached dyno sheet shows a 124” with the stock throttle body and stock intake manifold making over 140 hp and torque. I doubt you would see any gain’s upgrading to. 64mn throttle body in a 114”
The SE version of the intake (as stated on the dyno chart) isn't the stock version being talked about. The stock version is a plastic 55mm that just sucks. Going with the SE55mm intake (aluminum not plastic) will have the same gains(ish) as the 64mm TB and manifold. But if you're going to upgrade get the 64mm setup so when you do go big bore on the engine you don't have to reinvest. Take a look at the videos my Moonshine Harley....great info and comparisons with side by side data.
 
The following users liked this post:
madmat (09-09-2022)


Quick Reply: M8 Throttle body and Intake 55 vs 64mm



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 AM.