Dyna Glide Models Super Glide, Super Glide Sport, Super Glide Custom, Dyna Glide Convertible, Super Glide T-Sport, Dyna Glide Police, Dyna Switchback, Low Rider, Street Bob, Fat Bob and Wide Glide.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What controls swingarm alignment?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 9, 2016 | 08:22 AM
  #41  
archergodwin's Avatar
archergodwin
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,440
Likes: 148
From: Northwest
Default

Originally Posted by bwoltz
I understand the oil thing.. I'm not sure abd out the "shear" versus "compression" thing. Compression says to me that the mount is compressing something.. As far as I can tell the VibraTech mount operates in shear just like the stock mount except that the device is round and not flat..

Does sound like you mount went bad if the motor started to sag significantly.. Did the rubber actually tear? The 6 speed bikes do seem a bit heavier than the 5 speeds.. I could see where they would eat mounts especially with a heavy exhaust system. I replace mounts on my 00 DX but the new mounts made no difference.. This is sort of getting a little OT here.. The OP's question was about alignment.
Maybe a little OT... but the front mount affects alignment and handling to a large degree.

The stock mount has two metal mounts. One mounts to the frame, the other mounts to the engine. Fuzed between these pieces of metal is the rubber. The way it is designed, the metal plates mounted to the engine, are trying to push past(down, gravity) the single metal slug mounted to the frame. The mount is feeling a 'shear' force.

The Predator also has two metal mount assemblies, one to the frame and one to the engine, but the engine mount sits on top of the frame mount, with the rubber sandwiched in between... it is being 'compressed'.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2016 | 09:47 AM
  #42  
cggorman's Avatar
cggorman
Thread Starter
|
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 11,448
Likes: 2,299
From: NW Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by archergodwin
Yes. I installed one when doing my front end/FLHTCU rim mod. I like it.. . a lot.
I think I'm sold on that! It does the job and looks clean. I can always notch the frame crossmember to allow a few degrees of adjustment if required. I strongly suspect the rear mount is far less important with regard to drivetrain alignment stability.
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2016 | 10:24 PM
  #43  
Max Headflow's Avatar
Max Headflow
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 19,786
Likes: 7,941
From: poway
Default

Originally Posted by archergodwin
Maybe a little OT... but the front mount affects alignment and handling to a large degree.

The stock mount has two metal mounts. One mounts to the frame, the other mounts to the engine. Fuzed between these pieces of metal is the rubber. The way it is designed, the metal plates mounted to the engine, are trying to push past(down, gravity) the single metal slug mounted to the frame. The mount is feeling a 'shear' force.

The Predator also has two metal mount assemblies, one to the frame and one to the engine, but the engine mount sits on top of the frame mount, with the rubber sandwiched in between... it is being 'compressed'.




Here is a pic of the vt rubber mount.. Notice that there is a bit of taper to the od and the ID spacer has the same thing but there really isn't a place where the rubber is directly compressed.. I don't see how it's any different than the stock mount which has a similar tapered shape to it.. Also when you tighten the center bolt the inner spacer does not compress anything..
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2016 | 07:48 AM
  #44  
cggorman's Avatar
cggorman
Thread Starter
|
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 11,448
Likes: 2,299
From: NW Ohio
Default

Bwoltz, you seem to be pretty experienced in the arena. Are you saying the Vibra-Technics is inferior in some way? Do you have any suggestions for a good drivetrain mounting system? I don't mind sacrificing some isolation for good rear tire control.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2016 | 11:28 AM
  #45  
Max Headflow's Avatar
Max Headflow
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 19,786
Likes: 7,941
From: poway
Default

Not saying that the VT stuff is inferior. But IMO it's not as much different than the stock mounts as some would think.. The link is good.. I do think adding a link to the front is beneficial whether you use VT or Sputhe, TrueTrack or whatever.. The back link is likely not as important as the front unless you carry a lot of weight in the back like saddle bags.. I have a 2000 FXDX and have tried both Sputhe with stock motor mount and VT. The 2000 FXDX I have is a high compression 116 that makes 125/128. It has had handling issues in the past but right now it's rock solid.. I'm currently using the Sputhe front. Rear didn't make much difference. I've read where others have had good luck with the above mounts so I would definitely give one of them a try. If you don't have vibration issues, I'd lean towards links front and back and see if they help.

Looks like your bike is a 99 WG.. If you want to get that bike handing better, you will also want to look at wheels. Stock spoked wheels with steel rims flex. You can replace the stock rims with aluminum, loose some weight and pick up stiffness. I'd add better shocks front and rear..

Tires will also make a big difference in handling.. HD/dunlop 402s are not the best tires for cornering..
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2016 | 12:16 PM
  #46  
cggorman's Avatar
cggorman
Thread Starter
|
Extreme HDF Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 11,448
Likes: 2,299
From: NW Ohio
Default

Thanks. That's my plan. The rear is currently a 180/65-16 mounted on a 40 spoke aluminum Excel rim with stainless spokes and nipples from Buchanans. Torqued to 80-ish in-lbs with both runout measurements under .015 TIR.

When I get there, the front will be similar but with a 150-ish tire. Shocks are also on the list. Works or Ohlins. Something tunable and rebuildable.
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2016 | 04:56 PM
  #47  
Max Headflow's Avatar
Max Headflow
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 19,786
Likes: 7,941
From: poway
Default

Sounds a little like what I did except that I went with a 180/55-18 rear.. Front is 110/80-19 on a 2.5 inch rim.. Rims are aluminum RevTech with Buchanan spokes.. Use Bridgestone Exedra G850 on the rear and T30 on the front.. Tires are nice and sticky but rears only last about 2500 miles..
 
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2016 | 10:57 PM
  #48  
archergodwin's Avatar
archergodwin
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,440
Likes: 148
From: Northwest
Default

Originally Posted by bwoltz
.... But IMO it's not as much different than the stock mounts as some would think....
Sorry, will disagree there.

Couple pics of the broken down front mount. Perhaps this shows the 'shear' that I am speaking of.
 
Attached Thumbnails What controls swingarm alignment?-20160417_130102-1-.jpg   What controls swingarm alignment?-20160417_130050.jpg  
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2016 | 09:13 AM
  #49  
Max Headflow's Avatar
Max Headflow
Seasoned HDF Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 19,786
Likes: 7,941
From: poway
Default

Originally Posted by archergodwin
Sorry, will disagree there.

Couple pics of the broken down front mount. Perhaps this shows the 'shear' that I am speaking of.
I understand what you are saying bit the discussion was centered around how the VT mount worked. The VT is still functions in shear.. Now which lasts longer is certainly up for discussion.. The later 06 up Dyna frames seem to be eating motor mounts.. Not sure if it's alignment or added mass to the drive train.. Exhaust weight and mounting would be a factor.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2016 | 10:24 PM
  #50  
archergodwin's Avatar
archergodwin
Elite HDF Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,440
Likes: 148
From: Northwest
Default

I still say the VT is in compression... but we'll agree to disagree

Part of the issue with the stock front mount might be the stroker engine, sets up different harmonics/vibrations due to different mass/stroke length. I know trying to keep oil off the damn thing when changing filters is pretty near impossible.. and rubber/oil do not like each other.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 AM.