We all know that there is no such thing as "assless" chaps, because if they weren't assless, they would be pants.

But, I've been lying awake at night for the past week, pondering this question:

"Why aren't they called "crotchless" chaps, and where can I go to get an answer to this very difficult question?"

 

I wonder if it might cause confusion with "crotchless panties."

 

it,s a poser thing.some things sould,nt be ask.

 

Dang you. Now every time I have them on, I'll be wondering if I've gone crotchless or assless. Both of which I thought I had plenty of before I left the house.

 

They are only "assless" when they are not being worn!

 

Try one of the Victoria Secrets Forums. Or something along those lines. They should have much more experience with the "assless or crotchless" debate.

 

non assless chaps. problem solved. plus the guy in the tux is probably an *** so that would be double assed chaps

 

All the less stuff is depressing. I think from now on they should be referred to as legs chaps. Come on. Let's all try to be positive about stuff.

 

Chaps look GAY!..JMPO..I have friends who wear chaps and thats ok..but I tell them CHAPS look GAY...I would rather be cold...JMPO...PLEASE dont be too hard on me...:>)

 

They are only "assless" when worn by those that like to be referred to as twinkle toes.The rest of us, worn only to keep the wind off our legs,no need for leather on *** we are sitting on it! Gotta wonder who started the term "assless" and why.