Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Modding 2008 Street Glide vs Newer Model

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-03-2018, 02:24 PM
Drunky's Avatar
Drunky
Drunky is offline
6th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 13
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Modding 2008 Street Glide vs Newer Model

New here but not new to bikes. I currently have a 2008 Street Glide 100% stock with 8k miles on it. I was wanting to do a performance build with the bike (built motor, trans, full suspension, brakes, etc), but talking it over with a few people I was told I would be better off going with a newer model for a performance build.

I understand that in 2009-2013 the frame was updated and the rear tire was increased from a 150 to a 180 and of course in 2014 the Rushmore bikes came out. I'm wondering how much the newer frame, tire, and Rushmore changes lend themselves to a better build.

Also I noticed most performance builds are Road Glides. Any particular reason the Road Glide is chosen more often over the Street Glide.
 

Last edited by Drunky; 10-03-2018 at 02:25 PM.
  #2  
Old 10-03-2018, 03:01 PM
0ldhippie's Avatar
0ldhippie
0ldhippie is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 0
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Aside from not being a bastard year (one year only parts) an ‘09 up frame is stiffer and mounts the swing arm better. In ‘14 the front forks are stiffer and mounted better. While a “track bar” will help the rear “ wobbles” and the front fork mounting can be upgraded if I was thinking of building a “performance bagger” it would start with the Rushmore platform. The frame mounted RG fairing takes the weight off the forks to give lighter/quicker handling plus less wind induced handling problems.
 
The following users liked this post:
HM_SanDiego (10-03-2018)
  #3  
Old 10-03-2018, 04:26 PM
hd4evr2008's Avatar
hd4evr2008
hd4evr2008 is offline
Grand HDF Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,810
Received 1,841 Likes on 826 Posts
Default

IMHO, the cost of moving up to a newer bike would probably deplete all the money you have to build the 2008. I'd build the bike you have, and be happy.

I've ridden the newer framed, bigger back tire, etc. bikes, and (TO ME) they're not that much improved that would cause me to go in debt to get one.
 
  #4  
Old 10-03-2018, 06:02 PM
5150northrider's Avatar
5150northrider
5150northrider is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Montana
Posts: 2,573
Received 206 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

09 and up is the better choice. Go ride one and you will know the answer for your self.
 
  #5  
Old 10-03-2018, 07:08 PM
EdwardK's Avatar
EdwardK
EdwardK is offline
Road Warrior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,800
Received 304 Likes on 226 Posts
Default

I hope you just bought that bike. If it only has 8,000 mile on it, you don't ride it enough to spend that kind of money on it for a performance build.

The 08 is a bastard year in some respects but I love my 08 Road King Classic. I bought it new and have 132,000 plus miles on it and will keep rebuilding/repairing it until it can't be done any more. If you like the bike, go for your performance build. The basic engine is the same from 08 through 13. There is no reason you can't build your 08 up. At 112,000 I bumped mine up to a 103 and cams. I didn't want a performance build since it's my commuting bike, I wanted a tank that would last another 100,000 plus miles but there was no reason I couldn't have had it stroked out to whatever. My indy would have loved me if I had $$$.

Other people have mentioned the newer frame. I also have a 2013 Limited. It's slightly stiffer but in my opinion, jumping back and forth between bikes, it's not that big of a difference. I don't have a frame stiffener on my 08 like a True Trak. I haven't felt the need but it's an option for you if the frame doesn't like the HP you add.

Good luck and have fun with it.
 
  #6  
Old 10-03-2018, 08:17 PM
tinsnips's Avatar
tinsnips
tinsnips is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: northern calif
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I have an 08 Ultra that I bought brand new and haven't had a problem yet. I also thought about getting a newer bike but this one is paid for and I know exactly how it handles
 
  #7  
Old 10-03-2018, 08:58 PM
slodsm's Avatar
slodsm
slodsm is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tyler Tx
Posts: 1,108
Received 353 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

Personally I’d build the 08. My biggest reason for always buying older low mileage bikes is one, I like to do what I want to them and not worry about bringing a 23k bike home and pulling it apart wrecking my warranty, but mainly, freakin insurance. I pay 320 a year for full coverage plus accessories with a 500 deductible.

Its 4-5 times as much for a 2018 model. The bike payment isn’t terrible, insurance is just a huge *** kicker to me.

Personally I’d build what you’ve got. As much as I love that new car/bike smell, I’ve not bought a brand new motorcycle since 2003 and haven’t bought a new 4 wheeled vehicle since 2006.
 
  #8  
Old 10-03-2018, 09:17 PM
Drunky's Avatar
Drunky
Drunky is offline
6th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 13
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EdwardK
I hope you just bought that bike. If it only has 8,000 mile on it, you don't ride it enough to spend that kind of money on it for a performance build.
Haha! Agreed! It was actually my dad's. He bought it used in 2010 with 2k miles on it and only put 5k miles on it 8 years and it was just sitting in his garage collecting dust. I figured I could put it to good use and after a few whiskies he finally agreed.

As much as I'd like a newer bike I don't want a payment. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't trying to polish a turd before I started throwing money at it. I have rebuilt older bikes in the past and found that some of them are just plain pains in the ***. I don't want to spend extra money doing frame work and things like that. If it's not a good foundation for a build I'll just leave it stock and enjoy it for what it is.

This is my first touring model so I'm learning as I go. I have owned sportsters and dynas in the past.

Can anyone elaborate on it being a "bastard" year?
 

Last edited by Drunky; 10-03-2018 at 09:24 PM.
  #9  
Old 10-03-2018, 09:23 PM
run1fsr's Avatar
run1fsr
run1fsr is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 2,114
Received 66 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Build what you want with what you have vs. taking on debt ... just my .02 cents.
 
  #10  
Old 10-04-2018, 05:35 AM
caulk04's Avatar
caulk04
caulk04 is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Transfer, PA
Posts: 843
Received 222 Likes on 162 Posts
Default

In 08 they went to the newer seat mounting, metric axle bearings and a few other little things. I had an 08 and liked it, rarely did I wish it was a newer bike.

That said, I just was forced into getting a new bike and settled on this particular 11 which does make many accessories easier to find for the newer frame.

IMO - Build what you have.
 


Quick Reply: Modding 2008 Street Glide vs Newer Model



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 PM.