DYNO Numbers for Baggers???
#221
09-13-2006, 10:33 PM
RE: DYNO Numbers for Baggers???
You are surely right about the 2 into 1 pipe. My tuner said I could definately pick up some torque down low between 2500 -3000 RPM, but he said the top end might not vary to much. I just like the looks of the true duals, and with a 103 figured I wouldn't feel any dip. If I ever figure out how to post my Dyno sheet, I will.
Greg
Greg
#222
09-14-2006, 01:07 AM
Elite HDF Member
RE: DYNO Numbers for Baggers???
ORIGINAL: FLHXI 06
You are surely right about the 2 into 1 pipe. My tuner said I could definately pick up some torque down low between 2500 -3000 RPM, but he said the top end might not vary to much. I just like the looks of the true duals, and with a 103 figured I wouldn't feel any dip. If I ever figure out how to post my Dyno sheet, I will.
Greg
You are surely right about the 2 into 1 pipe. My tuner said I could definately pick up some torque down low between 2500 -3000 RPM, but he said the top end might not vary to much. I just like the looks of the true duals, and with a 103 figured I wouldn't feel any dip. If I ever figure out how to post my Dyno sheet, I will.
Greg
Steve
#223
09-14-2006, 01:36 PM
RE: DYNO Numbers for Baggers???
I had the standard baffles in when I first put them on, but I had already ordered the HP baffles.
When I looked at the difference between the two of them, I thought they were the same. I called BUB ENT. to tell them they were the same. They explained that they are the same except for minor change inside. When I looked, I saw that the end was a smaller diameter than the rest of the baffle. This is supposed to give more power with no torque loss and no more noise,(according to them). It seemed to run better with these ones and wasn't any louder, so I left them in.
P.S. These are the newer type Rineharts
Greg
When I looked at the difference between the two of them, I thought they were the same. I called BUB ENT. to tell them they were the same. They explained that they are the same except for minor change inside. When I looked, I saw that the end was a smaller diameter than the rest of the baffle. This is supposed to give more power with no torque loss and no more noise,(according to them). It seemed to run better with these ones and wasn't any louder, so I left them in.
P.S. These are the newer type Rineharts
Greg
#224
09-18-2006, 04:24 PM
Grand HDF Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Twin Cities Minnesota
Posts: 3,992
Received 6,883 Likes
on
1,102 Posts
RE: DYNO Numbers for Baggers???
ORIGINAL: 04RoadKing
Hell yeah he sould get results like that with a 103"
Just think what it would be like if he Sh-t canned the Rineharts and put on a 2-1. Sorry FLHXI06, wnogood, and maineuultraclassic but it's true.
ORIGINAL: jeepster09
There is no way your bike would make that kind of power with only a race tuner and Rineharts.....I think the tuner is giving you someone elses dyno sheet.
"When finished on the dyno: Horsepower 105.33 Torque 108.45"
[sm=nothatway.gif][sm=signs006.gif]
ORIGINAL: FLHXI 06
Here's my story. A couple of months ago I put some Khromewerk slip-ons, on my Streeglide.
I took it to the dealer and had my SERT installed and mapped. I thought it ran pretty well except for an occasional sputter. I changed my exhaust recently, and put on some Rinehart True duals with the H.P baffles. Well I got my bike dynoed last Friday.
When first put on the dyno: Horsepower 95.96 Torque 97.47
When finished on the dyno: Horsepower 105.33 Torque 108.45
The guy tuned my bike for about 1-1/2 hours. I watched him the whole time. He was never worried about getting me in and out , just wanted to get the best performance. Best $ 375.00, I ever spent. Runs waaaaaaaay better now! If anybody is interested, it was at RC Cycles in Hayward, Ca.
Here's my story. A couple of months ago I put some Khromewerk slip-ons, on my Streeglide.
I took it to the dealer and had my SERT installed and mapped. I thought it ran pretty well except for an occasional sputter. I changed my exhaust recently, and put on some Rinehart True duals with the H.P baffles. Well I got my bike dynoed last Friday.
When first put on the dyno: Horsepower 95.96 Torque 97.47
When finished on the dyno: Horsepower 105.33 Torque 108.45
The guy tuned my bike for about 1-1/2 hours. I watched him the whole time. He was never worried about getting me in and out , just wanted to get the best performance. Best $ 375.00, I ever spent. Runs waaaaaaaay better now! If anybody is interested, it was at RC Cycles in Hayward, Ca.
There is no way your bike would make that kind of power with only a race tuner and Rineharts.....I think the tuner is giving you someone elses dyno sheet.
"When finished on the dyno: Horsepower 105.33 Torque 108.45"
[sm=nothatway.gif][sm=signs006.gif]
Hell yeah he sould get results like that with a 103"
Just think what it would be like if he Sh-t canned the Rineharts and put on a 2-1. Sorry FLHXI06, wnogood, and maineuultraclassic but it's true.
Well that is beleaveable then....a 103.
#226
09-20-2006, 12:30 PM
RE: DYNO Numbers for Baggers???
Good numbers. Had my 2000 95cc RG dino tuned by 2 different tuners there numbers are so close 94 tq 79 Hp Im useing 2 in 1 thunders headers 42 mm throttle body 203 cams wished I had the race tuner , having the stage 2 down load is a set back I think. Here is the catcher Im going in for 510 cams and gears. mable is running rich Im hoping it won't need another dino. The wife named the RG Mable
[IMG]local://upfiles/3159/B33A7023B44445AE90F23971885A1DFF.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/3159/B33A7023B44445AE90F23971885A1DFF.jpg[/IMG]
#228
09-21-2006, 11:46 AM
Tourer
RE: DYNO Numbers for Baggers???
I originally posted somewhere back at page 13... I just got back from Delmarva Bike Week and had another run at the dyno. It has been determained that with all the ridability issues and the huge lean/rich swings... I will be ditching the S&S E carb and going back to CV. I have been emailing Steve at GMR about getting one done. I will see. Anyhow, here is the dyno.
[IMG]local://upfiles/15669/377010F27C6A4177B7B13AF9F6F6E894.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/15669/377010F27C6A4177B7B13AF9F6F6E894.jpg[/IMG]
#230
09-25-2006, 10:18 AM
