Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Difference in power 96 versus 103

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 08-28-2009, 12:48 PM
paco ritter's Avatar
paco ritter
paco ritter is offline
Cruiser
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Texas/Arkansas border
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 2009blackpearle
paca im guess the dealer did your install. can I ask how much he charged to install the 103 kit with 255 cams kit is 1075 cdn or 899 usa. since I am close to the border I could buy it at either place or have us deal do the install
dealer installed my 103 kit and dynoed the bike after break in for $1440. Did not include PCIII, Stage I breather, Rush mufflers, SE Compensator, or Fulsac true duels at that price. Everything but the SE compesator was already on the bike before the 103 kit was installed. SE compensator was added several months later after trying many things to stop the spitting back and extreme grinding of the starter when trying to start the engine. Many people with a 103ci and SE255 cams have this problem or some form of hard starting due to the cam timing @startup with the SE255 cams. Save yourself the headache and have the SE compensator installed during the engine build, it's worth the extra money spent (I'm guessing around $350-$400 installed) PACO
 
  #22  
Old 09-09-2009, 01:16 PM
tlippy's Avatar
tlippy
tlippy is offline
Intermediate
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 103?

The local EAGLE RIDER dealer told me he installed the 103 kit on his 2007 Ultra and really couldn't tell much difference - especially not enough for the $$$. I trust the Redmond, Oregon Eagle Riders advice since he buys new bikes, rents them out totally stock. He uses Harley oil products and sells the bikes at around 40,000 miles. Never had and problems with dyno oil, overheating or anything else. He told me 'buy it and ride it" KISS
 
  #23  
Old 09-09-2009, 02:36 PM
solorider's Avatar
solorider
solorider is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Posts: 3,475
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Not to cause a flame fest, but I feel the upgrades from Harley and its dealers are a major waste of money. The guys I know that break the 100 h.p. barrier always have their work done by an independent engine builder. This past weekend I watched 3 bikes gets dyno'd at a motorcycle rally. Stock 88" with Rineharts, a.c. and download had 79 h.p. SE Fat Boy with 103" and some after market slash down pipes only had 85 h.p. Third bike was a v-twin Yamaha with some really loud straight pipes that put out 109 h.p.!! (nice job Harley)

So, going back to the point of the thread, IMHO no matter what engine comes on your bike straight from Harley, you shouldn't spend more than is required for an air cleaner, fuel management and pipes you like.
 
  #24  
Old 09-09-2009, 04:11 PM
iclick's Avatar
iclick
iclick is offline
Extreme HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by paco ritter
My stock 96ci Ultra was much better than my stock 88ci Fatboy until I had the Fatboy reamed out to a 95ci 100hp/torque engine. After selling the 'Boy in favor of the Ultra comfort, I upgraded the 96ci to a 103ci with 255 cams, flat tops, 2" Rush mufflers, Fulsac true duels, a PCIII, and SE compensator, about $3000 worth all together. It dynos at 84hp and 105 ft lbs of torque now. Not a sceamer like the Fatboy, but great trailer pulling, two up riding torque in 6th gear and I can even pull away from 45mph in 6th without a problem now. The 96 would not do this. Only thing is that above 60mph I drop from 40mpg to 30-32mpg, depending on how fast I ride and how much I'm towing. The MPG really suffered, I didn't like that part, but if you dance, you pay....after de-bugging the entire build (starting problems cured by the SE compensator, so if you do the build, go on and do the SE compensator and save your self a lot of trouble. forget the hi-torque starter, forget the compression releases, just get the SE compensator installed and all is well....), I wouldn't swap it now for a boat load of 96ci'ers. I LIKE my 103....
I would say the key to the Stage II setup would be the SE255 cams. I installed these in my otherwise stock TC96 (with Fuel Moto Power Package) and they made a noticeable difference, including the ability that you mention to cruise and pull away in 5th or 6th at lower speeds. I haven't dynoed mine but others have done so and are seeing at or near 100TQ and HP in the low-80's with nothing more than a cam change and a tune.

Also, Jamie at Fuel Moto told me that based on his duno-tuning experience the 103 kit alone (no cams) only provide a few HP/TQ gain over the TC96, so to me the real bang-for-the-buck upgrade is a cam change. I always suggest that people install the SE255's first, then upgrade further if they aren't happy with those results.
 
  #25  
Old 09-09-2009, 05:26 PM
WVULTRA's Avatar
WVULTRA
WVULTRA is offline
Road Captain
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I wouldn't discount the power from a small upgrade:



Guy posted this on another forum, and stated it was factory 103" Stage II upgrade on an '07 FLHX with 4" SE slip-ons and SERT.

Definitely a stump puller!

 
  #26  
Old 09-09-2009, 07:12 PM
MrHd1's Avatar
MrHd1
MrHd1 is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 452
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I rode the new Ultra limited and was dissapointed. I felt a tad more torque while accellerating at lower speeds. On the highway and roll=on passing in high gear it was not the equal of my 08 Ultra with nothing more than Rush slipons and 18K miles on my bike. The Ultra limited has some other nice features but the 103 isn't reason enough to buy. I have ridden the 110 in and do like that motor. BTW it has SE 255 cams or so I'm told. I will probably keep my current ride and upgrade the exhaust intake and go with a V&H fuel pak and spend the money on something else.
 
  #27  
Old 09-09-2009, 09:06 PM
Stone1's Avatar
Stone1
Stone1 is offline
Tourer
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If your flat out looking for power in a touring bike buy a 1800 Goldwing, I did; but I missed being on the Harley so after a year I went back to a Ultra. Just trying to add a little humor!
 
  #28  
Old 09-10-2009, 03:04 AM
RangeRat's Avatar
RangeRat
RangeRat is offline
Outstanding HDF Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 2,542
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

DAMN - scratch all this tripe. I failed to note you were asking about an '09 and my supposedly "great tip" won't even work on yours.

Quite OT (sorry OP) but I went the simple old-school "gearing" way myself - a basically stock '07 96 inch RK, stage 1 w/V&H ovals and stock head-pipes - no true engine mods at all.

I took advantage of the "6th gear is too over-geared" situation and installed an EVO 30T crank sprocket/primary chain. No comp now but don't miss it either... well... a little primary "rattle" at light throttle and low speed but I think that's because the EVO chain is a bit sloppier side-to-side that stock HD (will replace it one of these days to make sure but...). Did it last year and no problems whatsoever with somewhere around another 10-12 K-miles on it I guess.

The plus to actual riding feel on take-off is very noticeable (and is to my friends too ), the HWY cruise feel in 6th is GREATLY improved (my comfortable "cruise" is 70-75 or so), and some stranger was riding it (not me of course) and said indicated top-end was still over 105/110 or thereabouts. I don't do serious mileage type stuff but haven't noticed anything to speak of in regards to that.

In other words, very pleased and it was cheap too. Last tire change I went to Elite 3's (slightly less overall diameter) which also tweaked the gearing a tiny bit more but that smidgen more was not even noticeable from the "ride feel" perspective. You absolutely positively WILL loose the 6th gear indicator (brain box controlled and gets fooled by RPM versus MPH change) but for me anyway, that was a very small price to pay.

ETA:
Link to EVO catalog
Link to a good thread (pro/con) here on HD Forums

ETA2:
 

Last edited by RangeRat; 09-10-2009 at 03:37 AM.
  #29  
Old 09-10-2009, 03:17 AM
monkish's Avatar
monkish
monkish is offline
Road Master
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Winston Salen, NC
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by solorider
Not to cause a flame fest, but I feel the upgrades from Harley and its dealers are a major waste of money. The guys I know that break the 100 h.p. barrier always have their work done by an independent engine builder. This past weekend I watched 3 bikes gets dyno'd at a motorcycle rally. Stock 88" with Rineharts, a.c. and download had 79 h.p. SE Fat Boy with 103" and some after market slash down pipes only had 85 h.p. Third bike was a v-twin Yamaha with some really loud straight pipes that put out 109 h.p.!! (nice job Harley)

So, going back to the point of the thread, IMHO no matter what engine comes on your bike straight from Harley, you shouldn't spend more than is required for an air cleaner, fuel management and pipes you like.
My name is Joe. Nice to meet you. There, now you can't say that anymore.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Siv24
Touring Models
20
05-07-2015 09:29 AM
axlespacer
Exhaust System Topics
1
02-06-2013 06:35 AM
jackinthebox
Exhaust System Topics
10
05-23-2009 09:39 AM
BigD64
Screamin Eagle CVO Models
4
11-19-2008 12:13 AM
dlrshort
Touring Models
9
04-10-2008 05:11 PM



Quick Reply: Difference in power 96 versus 103



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 PM.