no one is buying this...all his posts are on this. something stinks.

 

Stinks...... yea....

I wanna find out where he is buying his gasoline....

If those performance numbers were possible out of a stock 96" powerplant, I think Fuel Moto would be boasting them just a little.

 

can't believe I fell for that one....

 

Post that dyno sheet or I'm calling B.S. here too!

 

103Hp/115 Tq is definitely an optimistic number for a 96" motor, and not possible with stock compression and stock heads

 

This guy Ster is in this thread too? I'm going with Jamie's numbers as a good reference.

 

Well, it's possible to come up with a dyno chart that shows that. STD uncorrected on a cold day at sea level. It's exactly why comparing dyno charts is nothing more than barstool racing.

The guy has been pretty good natured about all the scepticism, though.

 

He did post his dyno sheet in another thread, and to the OP's credit it does show what he's claiming. It's posted in STD, which will lower his numbers slightly when converted to SAE, but even factoring that in, once Jamie posted his opinion on this, that's all I needed to hear. Something's just not right here.

 

I have Stage II heads, 2in1 pipes and high flow exhaust and TW6 Woods cams and its a whole lot better numbers than I got. So I freaked out when I seen it.
I'm skeptical myself of the numbers that are claimed..

 

So what is the final consensus on this? Either his tuner is on to something or he is on something.