Touring Models Road King, Road King Custom, Road King Classic, Road Glide, Street Glide, Electra Glide, Electra Glide Classic, and Electra Glide Ultra Classic bikes.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

96 to a 103 or change cam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-24-2015, 11:22 PM
3/4 life crisis's Avatar
3/4 life crisis
3/4 life crisis is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 96 to a 103 or change cam?

Hello all,

2008 FLHX with a 96", going on 75k miles on OEM engine. Started using a little oil (about 1/2 quart per 5k miles). I think the top end is due for a freshening up. Should I bore it out to a 103"? Or should I just "re-ring" the pistons and maybe change cams?

I'm not necessary after more power, but if either make sense, I'm not oppose to either. Longevity is my primary goal. I ride solo and never rev above 4500rpm. I'm the type that keep a vehicle, or bike till it die die. Case in point, my 3 vehicles are 1984 Impala, 94 Caprice, and 97 Caravan.

As always I welcome your inputs. Ride safe.
 
  #2  
Old 02-24-2015, 11:30 PM
mkguitar's Avatar
mkguitar
mkguitar is offline
Extreme HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Phoenix '53, '88, '09 Big Twins
Posts: 14,746
Received 395 Likes on 337 Posts
Default

if the heads are off- then swapping pistons and cylinders is slight cost- time/money.
you'll want to get comp releases added to the heads

the 103 has more torque than the 96"--- not gobs more power, but it is there and usable in city or canyon riding...bike is a little more comfy in 6th at 65.
103 parts can be super cheap from teh guys who are chasing more power...watch the classifieds

you could do cams at the same time.

do you have a tuner which will deal with these changes or will that be an added cost?

mike
( happily riding a stage 1 96")
 

Last edited by mkguitar; 02-24-2015 at 11:37 PM.
  #3  
Old 02-24-2015, 11:45 PM
3/4 life crisis's Avatar
3/4 life crisis
3/4 life crisis is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm running a Power Commander 5, along with a dyno at 77.95hp and 88.30 torque. Not particularly great numbers but it's adequate for me.
 
  #4  
Old 02-25-2015, 04:54 AM
Big Limited's Avatar
Big Limited
Big Limited is offline
Intermediate
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: holton ks
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In alot of cases Cubic Inches is hard to beat. Cams ma
 
  #5  
Old 02-25-2015, 05:22 AM
Tn.Heritage's Avatar
Tn.Heritage
Tn.Heritage is offline
Grand HDF Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 3,917
Received 183 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

If your planning on keeping the bike then I'd do a 107" engine kit. Fuel-Moto offers a great kit and at a fair price. I'd then get my heads done and run a cam and compression where I did not have to use the push button comp. release's, been there & done with that. If I had to go to comp release's I'd install the electric ones from HD. Again this is all depending on whether you keep the bike or not. Honestly if I had one with that many miles on it I'd seriously think of trading.
 
  #6  
Old 02-25-2015, 05:31 AM
HKMark23's Avatar
HKMark23
HKMark23 is offline
Seasoned HDF Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Great State of Canada
Posts: 6,166
Received 1,934 Likes on 1,111 Posts
Default

I'm a relative newbie so maybe this is more of a question than an answer but; my impression of cams is that mainly, they're used to move your usable power up or down the RPM range. So,, if I wanted more absolute power I'd go for the 103 cu in. If I wanted that power to kick in at the "Low" end, I'd install a 255 cam. If I wanted to shift more power toward the higher RPM's for better 6th gear performance, I'd install a 204 cam, (as I'm currently doing), taking some power from the low end and moving it to the upper end (RPM's).

Hopefully tech savvy guys will excuse my hokey explanation here, but this is my basic understanding of the relationships. The OP will want to confirm these ideas with his tech before making a decision, of course.
 
  #7  
Old 02-25-2015, 05:37 AM
0ldhippie's Avatar
0ldhippie
0ldhippie is offline
Ultimate HDF Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 6,129
Likes: 0
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

If ya want longevity, boring to 103 with new Pistons is better than throwing rings on the old ones. Then ya still got another rebore to 107 down the road, too. Good idea to freshen the heads and add compression releases. Might be able to find some low mile take-off 103 heads with them already. Ya don't have to do cams but it would be hard for me not to at least do cam bearings and lifters along with the top end,
 
  #8  
Old 02-25-2015, 07:00 AM
hd_rolling's Avatar
hd_rolling
hd_rolling is offline
Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Grays Creek, NC
Posts: 4,133
Received 146 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

If your truly happy with your 96" I would rebuild it and leave it alone. Once you start getting into mods that increase the power more issues start coming up. After I added cams to my 96" my clutch started to go and then the comp went. Fixed those and decided to do the S&S 106 big bore kit and my crank went out.

If you start to add more power the chance of other issues coming up start to increase.
 
  #9  
Old 02-25-2015, 07:20 AM
3/4 life crisis's Avatar
3/4 life crisis
3/4 life crisis is offline
Road Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hd_rolling
If your truly happy with your 96" I would rebuild it and leave it alone. Once you start getting into mods that increase the power more issues start coming up. After I added cams to my 96" my clutch started to go and then the comp went. Fixed those and decided to do the S&S 106 big bore kit and my crank went out.

If you start to add more power the chance of other issues coming up start to increase.
Made sense, I understand the 3 rules: Go fast, Reliable, and Inexpensive. Can have any 2, can't have all 3. Don't want to deal with compression release, I feel it's a BandAid, no reason to make the starter work harder than necessary.

That being said, what say you if I bore it out to a 103", keep compression low for stock head, and no cam?
 
  #10  
Old 02-25-2015, 07:39 AM
hd_rolling's Avatar
hd_rolling
hd_rolling is offline
Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Grays Creek, NC
Posts: 4,133
Received 146 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 3/4 life crisis
Made sense, I understand the 3 rules: Go fast, Reliable, and Inexpensive. Can have any 2, can't have all 3. Don't want to deal with compression release, I feel it's a BandAid, no reason to make the starter work harder than necessary.

That being said, what say you if I bore it out to a 103", keep compression low for stock head, and no cam?
Really it's up to you on the compression releases. If you have the heads off anyways to bore your cylinders it's cheap insurance to have them installed. You don't have to use them even if they're installed. Worse case you decide to add cams and compression later, at least they would be done?

I wouldn't say they are needed though just for a 103 upgrade.
 


Quick Reply: 96 to a 103 or change cam?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 PM.